On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:52:49PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:13:41PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote: > > Jason Tan wrote on 01/09/2005 08:22: > > > We're on the BSD license only because torsmo, conky's predecessor, was > > > BSD. When we do Conky 2.x, which will be a complete rewrite almost from > > > scratch, it will be GPL 2. Let me know if you need any more information > > > or fixes or whatnot, and I'll try to take care of them soon. Thanks.
> > BSD license is perfectly OK to go into main. Packages like lilo, mailx, > > mount, netpbm use it, too. > For future ref for anyone: > Yup, it's the BSD 3 clause licence, which is fine. > The 4 clause isn't, as it has teh 'advertising' clause in it. Uh, no, 4 clause BSD *is* allowed in main. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
