Re: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib error

On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 01:53 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > section 8.1 of debian-policy states that > > [sic]The run-time library package should include the symbolic link that > |ldconfig| would create for the shared libraries. [sic] > > Does not this mean that ldconfig creates the symboli

Re: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib error

On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 01:25 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > I am trying to package fortranposix library. I produced some debian > packages but I am not satisfied with their quality. For example, when I do > > $lintian -i libfortranposix0_0.1-1_i386.deb > E: libfortranposix0: ldconfig-symlink-

Re: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib error

On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 01:25:24AM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > I am trying to package fortranposix library. I produced some debian > packages but I am not satisfied with their quality. For example, when I do > $lintian -i libfortranposix0_0.1-1_i386.deb > E: libfortranposix0: ldconfig-sym

Re: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib error

On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 01:53 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > section 8.1 of debian-policy states that > [sic]The run-time library package should include the symbolic link that > |ldconfig| would create for the shared libraries. [sic] > > Does not this mean that ldconfig creates the symbolic li

Re: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib error

skaller wrote: On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 01:25 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: I am trying to package fortranposix library. I produced some debian packages but I am not satisfied with their quality. For example, when I do $lintian -i libfortranposix0_0.1-1_i386.deb E: libfortranposix0: ldcon

ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib error

I am trying to package fortranposix library. I produced some debian packages but I am not satisfied with their quality. For example, when I do $lintian -i libfortranposix0_0.1-1_i386.deb E: libfortranposix0: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib usr/lib/libfortranposix.so.0 usr/lib/libfortranposix

Re: zoo: directory traversal security bug

> "Thomas" == Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote: >> I'm mantainer of zoo package and I need help to solve this bug: > ... >> I dont know C :( > Is it just me or does this sound wrong? Not to me. I don't think it's a requirement to know C to mainta

Re: how use dpatch for binary files ?

Hi, > Im thinking use uuencode and uudecode to solve this problem, but I > would like to know if have other option to solve it. It is the limitation of dpkg-source. That seems to be the right solution for the time being. regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: zoo: directory traversal security bug

Hi, Thomas Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote: I'm mantainer of zoo package and I need help to solve this bug: I adopted this package some days ago :) I know to make a package .deb,, but I am not a C developer :) I tried to find one solution in zoo packages from others distribs, but an

Re: zoo: directory traversal security bug

Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote: > I'm mantainer of zoo package and I need help to solve this bug: ... > I dont know C :( Is it just me or does this sound wrong? Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

zoo: directory traversal security bug

Hi, All I'm mantainer of zoo package and I need help to solve this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=309594 I dont know C :( I would be very grateful if someone could help me. Thanks Jose Carlos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

No need to pay more - cheapest OEM online.

OS-Adobe-Macromedia etc All under $15-$99 CDS http://gnbah.i74f3z0bxs0pfji.barwaldgakg.info It's not the questions that get us in trouble. It's the answers. There is nothing like good food, good wine, and a bad girl. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

Re: A question regarding unofficial packages (for Xen)

On 7/13/05, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's really nice. You'll find some of the information on > more useful than the policy itself. > > I've read that better integration in make-kpkg was on the TODO, but > make-kpkg on Xen sources worked for

Re: A question regarding unofficial packages (for Xen)

On 7/13/05, Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's really going to come down to what Adam thinks he can do. If he > believes he needs help then you could suggest that he sponsors you > (or a bunch of you). I do know there is a lot of interest in Xen. > > Adam is [EMAIL PROTECTED], did you

Re: A question regarding unofficial packages (for Xen)

Hi, On Wed, Jul 13, 2005, Yvette Chanco wrote: > The only things I could think to do were keep working on my packages > to make them clean and conform with policy, and post to this list to > ask for advice. Does anybody have thoughts on what the best course of > action is? That's really

Re: RFS: fortunes-ru - Russian fortune cookies

On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:46:10PM +0700, Basil Shubin wrote: > A collection of Russian fortune cookies, from various sources. > his package can be replacement for or an addition to the fortunes > package to let fortune speak Russian. > > I have packaged fortunes-ru, so long awaited by russian com

RFS: fortunes-ru - Russian fortune cookies

Hi, I'm seeking a sponsor for fortunes-ru * Package name: fortunes-ru Version : 1.33 Upstream Author : Pavel Maryanov aka Acid Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://freshmeat.net/projects/fortune-mod-ru/ * License : GPL Description : Russian fortune coo

Re: A question regarding unofficial packages (for Xen)

On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 03:16:45AM -0500, Yvette Chanco wrote: > Apologies if the answer to this is obvious, or if this is the wrong > list. My question involves Xen which has been maintained through > 2.0.5-3 (in experimental) by Adam Heath. I am not in any way trying to > highjack this package -

FROM ADDRESS NOT FOUND

This mailing list does not accept messages from email addresses that are not on the mailing list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A question regarding unofficial packages (for Xen)

Apologies if the answer to this is obvious, or if this is the wrong list. My question involves Xen which has been maintained through 2.0.5-3 (in experimental) by Adam Heath. I am not in any way trying to highjack this package - I was very happy with the original. However, since the release of Xen 2

Re: Not able to understand debian-policy 8.1.1

Ben Finney wrote: On 13-Jul-2005, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: In http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html , In section 8.1.1, in the second paragraph it says The package must call |ldconfig| in the |postinst| script if the first argument is configure; . The package