-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Beverly Davis wrote:
:: Ok. Sounds like people think that using the prefix is
:: a good idea. It also seems that the best case would be
:: if upstream would go ahead and adopt the prefix too.
:: So I'll try to supply him some patches and stuff. I'll
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:37:51 +0200, "Geert Stappers"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 08:21:41AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:24:07 +0200, "Geert Stappers"
>
> > > May I interpreter that as
> > >
> > > "Upstream as included the hx_ prefix also"
>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 08:21:41AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:24:07 +0200, "Geert Stappers"
> > May I interpreter that as
> >
> > "Upstream as included the hx_ prefix also"
> >
> > ?
>
> No, he hasn't done that yet. I went ahead and did it though because
> otherwi
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 05:49:05PM +0200, Miros/law Baran wrote:
> 25.06.2005 pisze Geert Stappers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > > > > I have prefixed the names of the executables with "hx_" to
> > > > > > try to avoid name conflicts (this was in the upstream TODO
> > > > > > file).
>
> > > > No,
25.06.2005 pisze Geert Stappers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > > > I have prefixed the names of the executables with "hx_" to
> > > > > try to avoid name conflicts (this was in the upstream TODO
> > > > > file).
> > > No, he hasn't done that yet. I went ahead and did it though
> > > because otherwis
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 06:21:27PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Beverly Davis [Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:21:41 -0600]:
> > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:41:10PM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
>
> > > > I have prefixed the names of the executables with "hx_" to try to avoid
> > > > name conflicts (this wa
6 matches
Mail list logo
