-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Beverly Davis wrote:
:: Ok. Sounds like people think that using the prefix is
:: a good idea. It also seems that the best case would be
:: if upstream would go ahead and adopt the prefix too.
:: So I'll try to supply him some patches and stuff. I'll
:: let ya'll know how it turns out. Thank you, everyone,
:: for the help so far.
Hi Beverly, mentors,
Just adding my two cents here, and it is not related
with the prefix or the "sponsor" (IANADD), it is just an idea
about the package name. :-)
We have (at least) [1]two packages with W3C software,
could you change the package name to follow the "name style"?
I believe it could help our users to identify/locate similar
and related stuff. ;)
[1]Result of 'aptitude search w3c'
w3c-dtd-xhtml W3C eXtensible HyperText Markup Language
w3c-markup-validator W3C Markup Validator
Hope it helps, kind regards,
- --
//////////
// Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
// GUD-PR / DUG-PR || http://www.debian-pr.org
// GUD-BR / DUG-BR || http://www.debian-br.org
// Debian Project || http://www.debian.org/
//////////
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCviPdCjAO0JDlykYRAg0kAJ9oMpzc9lORkb1AhY9/ij2aPw79lwCdHChs
iAf2eQfYetacBEvAVKLBC3w=
=J+y3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
