On 06-Jun-2005, Nigel Jones wrote:
> I must wonder, exactly what advantages over pico/nano,ee,vi etc are
> there?
Yes, this is just the sort of thing I (as a user) would expect to find
in the Description field, so that I can decide based on the metadata
whether to download the package and try it.
On 06/06/05, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 05-Jun-2005, astronut wrote:
> > The website lists the following reasons to use DAV:
>
> You probably want to rewrite the long description of the package to
> include what you think users will consider to be its features, so that
> prospectiv
On 05-Jun-2005, astronut wrote:
> The website lists the following reasons to use DAV:
You probably want to rewrite the long description of the package to
include what you think users will consider to be its features, so that
prospective users can decide whether they want this package or not.
I'd
On 6/5/05, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your dav_0.8.5.orig.tar.gz doesn't have the same size (and md5
> checksum) of the upstream dav-0.8.5.tar.gz.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dav-text$ ls -alF *.tar.gz
-rw--- 1 astronut astronut 22838 Feb 21 2004 dav-0.8.5.tar.gz
-rw
It's really JATE (Just another text editor), The website lists the
following reasons to use DAV:
* Memory and cpu efficiency
* Small filesize and footprint
* Freely licensed under the GPL
* Useful feature set
* Intuitive and easy to use
I was looking through the RFP/RTP page
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 11:39:31PM -0400, astronut wrote:
>Package: dav
>Architecture: any
>Description: A minimalist ncurses-based text editor
> DAV (DAV is not VI) is a free (as in freedom) GNU/Linux console-based text
> editor. It is licensed under the GPL and is still in development.
>
>I want
On 04-Jun-2005, Dafydd Harries wrote:
> If there is indeed a licence problem here, I can see two main solutions:
>
> - Try to get libyaz in Debian to link against GnuTLS instead of
>OpenSSL.
This is the cleanest solution in the long term. GnuTLS is explicitly
designed to be a GPLed TLS and S
Attract women now!
http://ytqmx.s7dleta37ks0wba.racyhiracy0.com
I can remember when the air was clean and sex was dirty.
Celibacy is not hereditary.
Transcend political correctness and strive for human righteousness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005, John Skaller wrote:
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of rtl/libflx_dynamic.so not recognized
> Here is an objdump:
> /usr/local/work/felix-1.1.0> objdump -f rtl/libflx_dynamic.so
> rtl/libflx_dynamic.so: file format elf64-x86-64
> architecture: i386:x86-64, f
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 01:26:30AM +1000, John Skaller wrote:
> Can anyone throw any light on why I am getting this message:
>
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of rtl/libflx_dynamic.so not recognized
The filename doesn't include a soname. Look in /lib/ and /usr/lib/ to
see how shared libraries s
Hello,
[I'm sending this to three lists. Please only reply to -devel unless
the answer is on-topic for some of the others.]
This mail is about making people aware of how actions aimed at
improving Debian, like providing a new version of a library or NMUing
a package, can have negative e
Can anyone throw any light on why I am getting this message:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of rtl/libflx_dynamic.so not recognized
Here is an objdump:
/usr/local/work/felix-1.1.0> objdump -f rtl/libflx_dynamic.so
rtl/libflx_dynamic.so: file format elf64-x86-64
architecture: i386:x86-64, f
Hi Loïc.
I think this is mostly a matter of taste, but here is my opinion.
Loïc Minier wrote:
> I'm considering the installation of these changelogs via dh_install.
Sounds like a good idea.
> - should I try merging the upstream changelogs instead of installing
>multiple changelogs? I don'
Download + CDS all OS and all under $15-$99 just
http://mlrfql.dkhsgcvosndkswv.impynjimpy9.com
The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything.
We don't work for each other, We work with each other.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Hi,
Upstream has multiple ChangeLogs in its tarballs, for example one for
src/aix, src/linux, etc., and also one for src/common, one for
examples/, one for doc/, one for po/, one for src/daemon.
dh_installchangelogs picks the root ChangeLog and only that one, and
you can't pass more
On 04.06.2005, at 05:39, astronut wrote:
Package: dav
Architecture: any
Description: A minimalist ncurses-based text editor
DAV (DAV is not VI) is a free (as in freedom) GNU/Linux console-
based text
editor. It is licensed under the GPL and is still in development.
Could you please list som
16 matches
Mail list logo
