"Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello.
> I wonder if there would be an emacs mode just for syntax coloration.
> I learn to build debian packages but all is black & white on my screen
> and it misses colors.
> Would you know if it exists?
I think you mean coloration
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 18:28 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Mar 2005, Jamie Jones wrote:
> > G'day,
> >
> > I maintain a few unoffical Debian packages. Before I make my repository
> > available to the world, I'd like to ensure that if someone runs
> > reportbug on one of my packages, it w
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005, Jamie Jones wrote:
> G'day,
>
> I maintain a few unoffical Debian packages. Before I make my repository
> available to the world, I'd like to ensure that if someone runs
> reportbug on one of my packages, it will email me, and not the Debian
> BTS.
See /usr/share/doc/reportbu
G'day,
I maintain a few unoffical Debian packages. Before I make my repository
available to the world, I'd like to ensure that if someone runs
reportbug on one of my packages, it will email me, and not the Debian
BTS.
The packages are targeted at sarge or better.
Thank you for your kind assistan
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 08:11:24PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
> On 03/08/2005 07:15 PM, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:02:19PM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
> >wrote:
> >>2 )
> >>
> >>To install the configuration file, I append to what I written (in the
> >>"inst
Lars Roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well yes and no - as I understand it you are allowed to distribute it as
> long as you do not call it Qmail.
It doesn't really matter, at least to Debian, since it's not for inclusion
in the Debian archive, but for the record this is not a correct
underst
On 03/08/2005 07:15 PM, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:02:19PM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
2 )
To install the configuration file, I append to what I written (in the
"install" section yet:
cp minimalist.conf-sample debian/minimalist/etc/minimalist.co
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:02:19PM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm still learning to build debian package.
> Following the Debian New Maintainer's guide.
> There are two things I dont understand:
>
> 1 ) ---
> I want that once the binary package is installed, the f
"Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hello.
> I did not make a backup copy of my "rules" file, and I edited it like a
> pig.
> I would like to do it again but with a clean "rules" file.
> I would like to re-generate the "rules" file. How to?
Next time, use a version con
Hello,
I'm still learning to build debian package.
Following the Debian New Maintainer's guide.
There are two things I dont understand:
1 ) ---
I want that once the binary package is installed, the file
'minimalist.pl' is into '/usr/bin'. To do so, I put these in the install
section of my "ru
On 03/08/2005 05:34 PM, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
Hello.
I did not make a backup copy of my "rules" file, and I edited it like a
pig.
I would like to do it again but with a clean "rules" file.
I would like to re-generate the "rules" file. How to?
[dh_make man page:]
-a, --addmissing
Add
Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
Hello.
I did not make a backup copy of my "rules" file, and I edited it like a
pig.
I would like to do it again but with a clean "rules" file.
Have you generated a package yet? If so, you will find it inside the
.diff.gz file.
If you don't have diff.gz file, it
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:34:04PM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
> Hello.
> I did not make a backup copy of my "rules" file, and I edited it like a
> pig.
> I would like to do it again but with a clean "rules" file.
> I would like to re-generate the "rules" file. How to?
A=$(mktemp -
$B5\A0;VJ]$5$s$,5.J}$r4uK>$7$^$7$?$N$G%a!<%k$rAw$i$;$FD:$-$^$7$?!#(B
$B!X:#%a!<%k$+EEOC$G$-$^$9$+!)$G$-$l$P:#F|2q$$$?$$$G$9!#!Y(B
$B4JC1$J%W%m%U%#!<%k$r:\$;$^$9!#(B
(B26$B:P!"G/<}(B1000$BK|1_0J>e!#(BT158$B!&(BB85$B!"(BD$B%+%C%W(BW58$B!"(BH86
$B5.J}$K>R2p$9$k;v$r5\A0;VJ]$5$s$KDLC
Hello.
I did not make a backup copy of my "rules" file, and I edited it like a
pig.
I would like to do it again but with a clean "rules" file.
I would like to re-generate the "rules" file. How to?
--
ASPO Infogérance http://aspo.rktmb.org/activites/infogerance
Unofficial FAQ fcolc http://f
Hello.
I wonder if there would be an emacs mode just for syntax coloration.
I learn to build debian packages but all is black & white on my screen
and it misses colors.
Would you know if it exists?
--
ASPO Infogérance http://aspo.rktmb.org/activites/infogerance
Unofficial FAQ fcolc http://
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 05:26:03 +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 12:43:18AM +0800, Li Daobing wrote:
> >* Package name: chmsee
> > Version : 0.9.0
> > Upstream Author : wa chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >* URL : http://linuxfire.dh
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 12:43:18AM +0800, Li Daobing wrote:
>* Package name: chmsee
> Version : 0.9.0
> Upstream Author : wa chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>* URL : http://linuxfire.dhis.org/~zhong/
>* License : GPL
> Description : A chm file viewer, support Chinese b
Hi,
Recently, I adopted the mc package with Stefano Melchior, and I'd like to
address the following problem: A woody security update broke the most
important feature in mc:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=246943
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=249366
What can be
Dear Applicant,
Your application was approved. You are eligible for $400,000 with a 3.7 % rate.
Please confirm your information here:
http://mortgage-specialists.com/2/index/mal/lodesert
We look forward to hearing from you.
Regards,
jodee ada
Freidman Lenders & Associates
re*mve. -> http://mo
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 16:48:09 +0100, Sven Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In this case, you can't use Provides:. dpkg doesn't allow versioned
> depends to be resolved by Provides: (and doesn't support versions in the
> Provides: statement either). You package is named qmail and the package
> yo
Lars Roland wrote on 08/03/2005 16:04:
It is a little more complex than that
The original package is named Qmail but its version is named
1.03-zarge1, so all packages that depends on Qmail looks for Qmail >>
1.03-zarge1. This is somewhat annoying because I want my package to be
named Qmail and have
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 04:04:27PM +0100, Lars Roland wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 08:50:13 -0500, Justin Pryzby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You can uses a Provides: in the control file (providing a non-virtual
> > package).
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 08:50:13 -0500, Justin Pryzby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can uses a Provides: in the control file (providing a non-virtual
> package).
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html
>
> Justin
It is a little more complex than that
The original pack
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 07:38:12 -0600 (CST), elijah wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> uhh - isn't qmail one of those packages that is licensed in such a way
> that you are NOT allowed to distribute patched binary builds or patched
> source?
>
> just a vague recollection, here... isn't that DJB's st
> On 2005-03-08 Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le Mardi 8 Mars 2005 12:25, Christian Hammers a ÃcritÂ:
> > > Is this behaviour unavoidable?
> >
> > well you can manually 'fix' with some pre/postrm magic.
>
> Any hints for an elegant solution? Sometimes /usr/local is a symlink,
> sometimes /usr/local/ma
Hello
On 2005-03-08 Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Mardi 8 Mars 2005 12:25, Christian Hammers a écrit :
> > Is this behaviour unavoidable?
>
> well you can manually 'fix' with some pre/postrm magic.
Any hints for an elegant solution? Sometimes /usr/local is a symlink,
sometimes /usr/local/maint...
On 03/08/2005 07:01 AM, liz wrote:
Greetings,
My apologies for the duplicate email.
My name is Liz and I am interested in adopting midentd if it is still
available. Since I am new to the maintainer process I suspect I will
need a mentor/sponsor. I have been working with Linux for eight years
o
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:51:00AM +0100, Lars Roland wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have created a package that replaces another package, but uses the
> same dependencies and have the same functionality. Given that I want
> to maintain a minimum of changes to existing packages I want to know
> if it is possib
Le Mardi 8 Mars 2005 12:25, Christian Hammers a ÃcritÂ:
> Is this behaviour unavoidable?
well you can manually 'fix' with some pre/postrm magic.
btw, I don't see the point in packaing in /usr/local .. even for private
packages .
--
ÂOÂ Pierre Habouzit
ÂÂO
OOO
Original package: qmail_zarge1 - This is the package that other packages
depends on also this package depends on fastforward_-zarge1 (circular
dependency).
My package: qmail_patched1 - I Want this to be a replacement to
qmail_zarge1but without changing fastforward_-zarge1
uhh - isn't qmail on
Hi.
Christian Hammers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[dpkg removing symlinks for directories in a package]
> Is this behaviour unavoidable?
Probably. If I'm not mistaken, this is #182747.
Kind regards
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Hi,
This is RFS #2 for libimage-rsvg-perl.
Image::LibRSVG is a great perl binding to librsvg. librsvg is the lib
used by Gnome, for example, to render thumbnails of SVG drawings.
I've packaged Image::RSVG perl, and look for someone to look at it
and if possible to sponsor its upload.
* Pack
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Christian Hammers wrote:
> I'm building a private(!) package with files in /usr/local/bin for a host
> where /usr/local/ is a symlink. Whenever I remove the package the symlink
> gets removed by dpkg although there are plenty of (non-Debian maintained)
> files in /usr/local
Hello liz,
* liz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-08 11:28]:
> I am interested in adopting midentd and seeking mentor :)
So talk to the original Maintainer, make a package, close
the bug and RFS after this :)
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de |
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 12:25:25PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> I feel a little stupid... :)
> I'm building a private(!) package with files in /usr/local/bin for a host
> where /usr/local/ is a symlink. Whenever I remove the package the symlink
> gets removed by dpkg although there are pl
Hello
I feel a little stupid... :)
I'm building a private(!) package with files in /usr/local/bin for a host
where /usr/local/ is a symlink. Whenever I remove the package the symlink
gets removed by dpkg although there are plenty of (non-Debian maintained)
files in /usr/local.
I guess this i
Hi
I have created a package that replaces another package, but uses the
same dependencies and have the same functionality. Given that I want
to maintain a minimum of changes to existing packages I want to know
if it is possible to let my package appear to debian as another
package.
that is:
Greetings,
My apologies for the duplicate email.
My name is Liz and I am interested in adopting midentd if it is still
available. Since I am new to the maintainer process I suspect I will
need a mentor/sponsor. I have been working with Linux for eight years
or so. I am currently a Sr Linux adm
Greetings,
I am interested in adopting midentd and seeking mentor :)
Thanks,
Liz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
40 matches
Mail list logo
