Re: RFS: x-no-session-manager - restore default X behavior with gnome/kde installed

2005-02-02 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Thursday 03 February 2005 01.54, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > As you can see the package is tiny. All it does is provide a dummy > alternative for x-session-manager that is _not_executable_ so the I think this should not be a package at all - it is really just a configuration, as it's really

Re: maserver: Dynamic libraries inside a program package

2005-02-02 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:09:26PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > If I can not put that .so inside the package, the other solution > might be getting 3 packages from maserver: libmaserver, > libmaserver-dev and maserver itself. libmaserver would have the > shared library and libmaserver-dev the heade

RFS: x-no-session-manager - restore default X behavior with gnome/kde installed

2005-02-02 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for a tiny, trivial package: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/x-no-session-manager% dpkg -I x-no-session-manager_1_all.deb new debian package, version 2.0. size 2648 bytes: control archive= 1089 bytes. 524 bytes,13 lines control 1118 bytes,32

Re: encoding of debian files debian/*

2005-02-02 Thread Andreas Barth
* Wouter van Heyst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050202 18:50]: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:57:28PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > > The problem is only that the name in changelog has to match the name in > > > control/dsc and friends, and it says that some tools still have problems > > > with utf-8

Re: Eclipse 3.0 testing and review

2005-02-02 Thread Jerry Haltom
Fixed. On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 12:30 -0600, elijah wright wrote: > > there's no orig.tar.gz there. :( > > is it, perhaps, still in the process of uploading? > > --elijah > > > On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Jerry Haltom wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 12:07:57 -0600 > > From: Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PR

Re: Eclipse 3.0 testing and review

2005-02-02 Thread elijah wright
there's no orig.tar.gz there. :( is it, perhaps, still in the process of uploading? --elijah On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Jerry Haltom wrote: Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 12:07:57 -0600 From: Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: Eclipse 3.0 testing and review Resent-Date

Eclipse 3.0 testing and review

2005-02-02 Thread Jerry Haltom
I have spent the better part of a month working on properly packaging Eclipse 3.0 for Debian. I believe I now have a suitable candidate for experimental in the current version available at mentors.debian.net. The version in mentors is 3.0.1-0wasabi7. It depends on a number of packages which are c

Re: encoding of debian files debian/*

2005-02-02 Thread Andreas Barth
* Wouter van Heyst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050202 18:10]: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:57:28PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > The problem is only that the name in changelog has to match the name in > > > control/dsc and friends, and it says that some tools still have problems > > > with utf-8 i

Re: encoding of debian files debian/*

2005-02-02 Thread Wouter van Heyst
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:57:28PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > The problem is only that the name in changelog has to match the name in > > control/dsc and friends, and it says that some tools still have problems > > with utf-8 in control files. However, I've been using utf-8 for tetex's > > c

Re: RFS: billard-gl -- OpenGL billiards game

2005-02-02 Thread Thierry Reding
> If noone offered you an upload yet, then I could do it for you. > > I tried to contact you via IRC, but without success ;P I just got confirmation from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that the billard-gl package was successfully uploaded. Thanks to Bartosz Fenski for sponsoring. You've been a great help! C

RFS: upgrade-oldest

2005-02-02 Thread Alexander Petrov
Hi, All. I'm calling for a Sponsor for my project. Package: upgrade-oldest. Description: Upgrade-oldest selectively upgrades a Debian system by upgrading the packages with the oldest and most significant version numbers. It can be limited to certain sections, and the level of version differece nec

Re: encoding of debian files debian/*

2005-02-02 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 19.27, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: [in copyright file] > Current de-facto standard is: Use UTF-8, use only the latin alphabet > (i.e., no chinese or something). Hmm. Last time I was reading a discussion about this, I felt a rough consesus was: UTF-8, it's ok to writ