It now looks like I will have network long enough to make an upload of
my attempt at packaging PyGgy:
Package: python-pyggy
Priority: optional
Section: python
Installed-Size: 332
Maintainer: Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: all
Version: 0.4.1-2
Depends: python (>= 2.3), py
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor to help me get this package into debian.
Package name : siefs
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Dmitry Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://mirror01.iptelecom.net.ua/~dmitry_z/siefs/
License : GPL
Description : vi
Hello George,
* George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-04 13:45]:
> On Thursday 04 November 2004 02:37, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 02:18:35AM +0200, George Danchev wrote:
> > > my humble question is: if I have Source: and multiple Package: lines
> > > described in my de
hi,
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-04 13:44]:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:06:01PM -0600, Zach Garner wrote:
[...]
> > What I meant by standard roughly translates into available on most/all
> > unix or linux systems. The format of a .deb file is special as far as I
> > can
It now looks like I will have network long enough to make an upload of
my attempt at packaging PyGgy:
Package: python-pyggy
Priority: optional
Section: python
Installed-Size: 332
Maintainer: Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: all
Version: 0.4.1-2
Depends: python (>= 2.3), py
Hi,
Joey Hess wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > any debian rules.
> >
> > the foo-0.1 is a convention. if your stuff doesn't follow it it is broken.
>
> No, there is no convention and it doesn't matter at all what you name
> the package's source directory. This has been completly unnecessary
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor to help me get this package into debian.
Package name : siefs
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Dmitry Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://mirror01.iptelecom.net.ua/~dmitry_z/siefs/
License : GPL
Description : vi
Hello George,
* George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-04 13:45]:
> On Thursday 04 November 2004 02:37, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 02:18:35AM +0200, George Danchev wrote:
> > > my humble question is: if I have Source: and multiple Package: lines
> > > described in my de
hi,
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-04 13:44]:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:06:01PM -0600, Zach Garner wrote:
[...]
> > What I meant by standard roughly translates into available on most/all
> > unix or linux systems. The format of a .deb file is special as far as I
> > can
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > any debian rules.
>
> the foo-0.1 is a convention. if your stuff doesn't follow it it is broken.
No, there is no convention and it doesn't matter at all what you name
the package's source directory. This has been completly unnecessary for
years.
> And: You *could* use a
Hi,
Joey Hess wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > any debian rules.
> >
> > the foo-0.1 is a convention. if your stuff doesn't follow it it is broken.
>
> No, there is no convention and it doesn't matter at all what you name
> the package's source directory. This has been completly unnecessary
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > any debian rules.
>
> the foo-0.1 is a convention. if your stuff doesn't follow it it is broken.
No, there is no convention and it doesn't matter at all what you name
the package's source directory. This has been completly unnecessary for
years.
> And: You *could* use a
12 matches
Mail list logo
