On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:38:49 +0200, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've placed the new package at the same location. Thanks for your time.
> Uploaded.
Thanks a lot! 8)
--
Besos,
Marga
Hello,
I'm currently looking for a check/review/sponsor for gnofract4d.
Description: easy creator of beautiful fractals
Gnofract 4D is an elegant creator of mathematical images called
fractals. What sets it apart from other fractal programs (and makes it
"4D") is the way that it treats the Mande
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:38:49 +0200, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've placed the new package at the same location. Thanks for your time.
> Uploaded.
Thanks a lot! 8)
--
Besos,
Marga
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
Hi,
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I've placed the new package at the same location. Thanks for your time.
Uploaded.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:33:35PM -0300, Antonio S. de A. Terceiro wrote:
> My idea is to make a first release with sources already translated
> (which can be done with a precompiled binary for i386 distributed by
> upstream), which would compile fine with just g++ and libxml2-dev as
> build-depen
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:41:09PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:53:32PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> >> I have a silly little problem with getting Python's distutils to play
> >> nice with Debian pac
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:33:35PM -0300, Antonio S. de A. Terceiro wrote:
> Joel Baker escreveu isso aí:
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 03:35:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > > Re: Jeroen van Wolffelaar in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >* how packages like those go in the repository for the fi
Hi,
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I've placed the new package at the same location. Thanks for your time.
Uploaded.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key
El d�a 21/10/2004 a 16:30 Andreas Barth escribio ...
> > Probably you may want to use a "more personal" email than the one your
> > employer gives you for Debian and free software related works. Since
> > in case you quit the job, you will lose communication with your peers,
> > and in Debian's c
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 03:49:56PM +0200, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
>
> About Outlook: it's propietary software. For me it's not a matter of taste or
> technichal reasons (mutt vs. kmail vs. evolution vs. thunderbird...), it's a
> matter of commitment with free software.
Hmmm? Do you really t
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:53:32PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> I have a silly little problem with getting Python's distutils to play
>> nice with Debian packaging. The library I am packaging (PyGGy) has a few
>> python files that
Margarita Manterola [u] wrote on 21/10/2004 21:26:
Ok, done too. Although the dpatch black magic still puzzles me.
At least dpatch doesn't require the upstream source to still be packed
like dbs seems to do. That's the main reason why I simply _hate_ dbs
based packages.
cu,
sven
* Rudy Godoy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041021 22:25]:
> On 21/10/2004 at 05:48 Maciej Dems wrote...
> > Sometimes one have no choice. E.g. the company policy requires its
> > employees to use Outlook (this is the case with my fiance).
> Probably you may want to use a "more personal" email than the one
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:33:35PM -0300, Antonio S. de A. Terceiro wrote:
> My idea is to make a first release with sources already translated
> (which can be done with a precompiled binary for i386 distributed by
> upstream), which would compile fine with just g++ and libxml2-dev as
> build-depen
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:41:09PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:53:32PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> >> I have a silly little problem with getting Python's distutils to play
> >> nice with Debian pac
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:33:35PM -0300, Antonio S. de A. Terceiro wrote:
> Joel Baker escreveu isso aí:
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 03:35:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > > Re: Jeroen van Wolffelaar in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >* how packages like those go in the repository for the fi
El día 21/10/2004 a 16:30 Andreas Barth escribio ...
> > Probably you may want to use a "more personal" email than the one your
> > employer gives you for Debian and free software related works. Since
> > in case you quit the job, you will lose communication with your peers,
> > and in Debian's c
On 21/10/2004 at 05:48 Maciej Dems wrote...
> Patrze w ekran, a to Alexis Sukrieh pisze do mnie:
> > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
> >
> > Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> > "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
>
> Sometimes
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 03:49:56PM +0200, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
>
> About Outlook: it's propietary software. For me it's not a matter of taste or
> technichal reasons (mutt vs. kmail vs. evolution vs. thunderbird...), it's a
> matter of commitment with free software.
Hmmm? Do you really t
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:19:17 +0200, Alejandro Exojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> El Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 14:53, David Moreno Garza escribió:
>> On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 09:03 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
>> > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
>> >
>> > Really, I don't want to fl
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:53:32PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> I have a silly little problem with getting Python's distutils to play
>> nice with Debian packaging. The library I am packaging (PyGGy) has a few
>> python files that
Hi!
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:14:25 +0200, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > The new package (source and binary) can be found at:
> > http://www.gnuservers.com.ar/~marga/debian/astyle/
> >
> > Please do tell me what you think of it.
> You moved to using dpatch; please mention that
Margarita Manterola [u] wrote on 21/10/2004 21:26:
Ok, done too. Although the dpatch black magic still puzzles me.
At least dpatch doesn't require the upstream source to still be packed
like dbs seems to do. That's the main reason why I simply _hate_ dbs
based packages.
cu,
sven
--
To UNSUBSCRI
* Rudy Godoy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041021 22:25]:
> On 21/10/2004 at 05:48 Maciej Dems wrote...
> > Sometimes one have no choice. E.g. the company policy requires its
> > employees to use Outlook (this is the case with my fiance).
> Probably you may want to use a "more personal" email than the one
Hi,
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I'm making a new package for astyle, which has been orphaned in
> August. I need a sponsor to upload it.
>
> In the package I've made, I've updated the files so that they comply
> with the new policies, and I've also taken care of some fixable bugs
> (3 out of 7)
Hi!
I'm making a new package for astyle, which has been orphaned in
August. I need a sponsor to upload it.
In the package I've made, I've updated the files so that they comply
with the new policies, and I've also taken care of some fixable bugs
(3 out of 7).
The other 4 bugs seem quite hard to
On 21/10/2004 at 05:48 Maciej Dems wrote...
> Patrze w ekran, a to Alexis Sukrieh pisze do mnie:
> > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
> >
> > Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> > "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
>
> Sometimes
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:19:17 +0200, Alejandro Exojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> El Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 14:53, David Moreno Garza escribió:
>> On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 09:03 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
>> > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
>> >
>> > Really, I don't want to fl
Joel Baker escreveu isso aí:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 03:35:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Re: Jeroen van Wolffelaar in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >* how packages like those go in the repository for the first time?
> > >
> > > By ignoring build-depends while in some way you've made your
Hi!
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:14:25 +0200, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > The new package (source and binary) can be found at:
> > http://www.gnuservers.com.ar/~marga/debian/astyle/
> >
> > Please do tell me what you think of it.
> You moved to using dpatch; please mention that
Hi,
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I'm making a new package for astyle, which has been orphaned in
> August. I need a sponsor to upload it.
>
> In the package I've made, I've updated the files so that they comply
> with the new policies, and I've also taken care of some fixable bugs
> (3 out of 7)
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 03:35:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Jeroen van Wolffelaar in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >* how packages like those go in the repository for the first time?
> >
> > By ignoring build-depends while in some way you've made your system to
> > actually be able to buil
Hi!
I'm making a new package for astyle, which has been orphaned in
August. I need a sponsor to upload it.
In the package I've made, I've updated the files so that they comply
with the new policies, and I've also taken care of some fixable bugs
(3 out of 7).
The other 4 bugs seem quite hard to
Joel Baker escreveu isso aí:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 03:35:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Re: Jeroen van Wolffelaar in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >* how packages like those go in the repository for the first time?
> > >
> > > By ignoring build-depends while in some way you've made your
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 03:35:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Jeroen van Wolffelaar in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >* how packages like those go in the repository for the first time?
> >
> > By ignoring build-depends while in some way you've made your system to
> > actually be able to buil
also sprach Alejandro Exojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.21.1549 +0200]:
> About Outlook: it's propietary software. For me it's not a matter
> of taste or technichal reasons (mutt vs. kmail vs. evolution vs.
> thunderbird...), it's a matter of commitment with free software.
You don't have to use i
El Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 15:25, martin f krafft escribió:
> Chill. First, it is trivial to create Debian packages even on
> Windows, and second... it's a mail client. I am also not complaining
> that you use KMail, am I? I think it's bloat and does not provide
> some important features. No,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:35:56PM +0100, David Given wrote:
> To change the subject slightly, does anyone know what happened to
> debian-win32? The mailing list seems to be dead, it's not on the ports page,
> and I can't seem to find any resources on the 'net that date past about 1997.
I don't
On Thursday 21 October 2004 14:25, martin f krafft wrote:
[...]
> Chill. First, it is trivial to create Debian packages even on
> Windows, and second... it's a mail client.
To change the subject slightly, does anyone know what happened to
debian-win32? The mailing list seems to be dead, it's not
Re: Jeroen van Wolffelaar in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >* how packages like those go in the repository for the first time?
>
> By ignoring build-depends while in some way you've made your system to
> actually be able to build the package. I.e., you've for example
> bootstrapped the compiler. Then
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 15:19 +0200, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
> > > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
> > >
> > > Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> > > "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
> >
> > Who cares? Probably that works for him.
also sprach Alejandro Exojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.21.1519 +0200]:
> It's propietary software that runs only in a propietary OS, in
> which is pretty hard to create Debian packages. ;-)
Chill. First, it is trivial to create Debian packages even on
Windows, and second... it's a mail client. I
El Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 14:53, David Moreno Garza escribió:
> On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 09:03 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
> >
> > Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> > "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses su
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 09:03 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
>
> Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
Who cares? Probably that works for him.
--
David Moreno Garz
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> I have a silly little problem with getting Python's distutils to play
> nice with Debian packaging. The library I am packaging (PyGGy) has a few
> python files that double as executable scripts (in short they have '#!
> /usr/bin/pyt
"Gokhan YESILYURT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My name is Gokhan YESILYURT from University of Michigan, Nuclear
> Engineering and Radiological Sciences. I have been working on
> debugging of the Cosign web login software for a long time so that I
> can prepare a debian package of this open source
also sprach Alejandro Exojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.21.1549 +0200]:
> About Outlook: it's propietary software. For me it's not a matter
> of taste or technichal reasons (mutt vs. kmail vs. evolution vs.
> thunderbird...), it's a matter of commitment with free software.
You don't have to use i
* Maciej Dems ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> Sometimes one have no choice. E.g. the company policy requires its
> employees to use Outlook (this is the case with my fiance).
I completly agree.
Sometimes we cannot be as *free* as we want ...
But this was a funny header in the context... :)
--
El Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 15:25, martin f krafft escribió:
> Chill. First, it is trivial to create Debian packages even on
> Windows, and second... it's a mail client. I am also not complaining
> that you use KMail, am I? I think it's bloat and does not provide
> some important features. No,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:35:56PM +0100, David Given wrote:
> To change the subject slightly, does anyone know what happened to
> debian-win32? The mailing list seems to be dead, it's not on the ports page,
> and I can't seem to find any resources on the 'net that date past about 1997.
I don't
On Thursday 21 October 2004 14:25, martin f krafft wrote:
[...]
> Chill. First, it is trivial to create Debian packages even on
> Windows, and second... it's a mail client.
To change the subject slightly, does anyone know what happened to
debian-win32? The mailing list seems to be dead, it's not
Re: Jeroen van Wolffelaar in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >* how packages like those go in the repository for the first time?
>
> By ignoring build-depends while in some way you've made your system to
> actually be able to build the package. I.e., you've for example
> bootstrapped the compiler. Then
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 15:19 +0200, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
> > > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
> > >
> > > Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> > > "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
> >
> > Who cares? Probably that works for him.
also sprach Alejandro Exojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.21.1519 +0200]:
> It's propietary software that runs only in a propietary OS, in
> which is pretty hard to create Debian packages. ;-)
Chill. First, it is trivial to create Debian packages even on
Windows, and second... it's a mail client. I
El Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 14:53, David Moreno Garza escribió:
> On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 09:03 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
> >
> > Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> > "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses su
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 09:03 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
>
> Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
Who cares? Probably that works for him.
--
David Moreno Garz
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> I have a silly little problem with getting Python's distutils to play
> nice with Debian packaging. The library I am packaging (PyGGy) has a few
> python files that double as executable scripts (in short they have '#!
> /usr/bin/pyt
also sprach Clément Stenac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.21.1210 +0200]:
> Libcddb is a small C library to access the CDDB server (Audio CD
> database). Licence is LGPL
CDDB is non-free. Can this also access freedb.org instead? I would
suggest to use that as a default.
--
Please do not CC me whe
Patrze w ekran, a to Alexis Sukrieh pisze do mnie:
> > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
>
> Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
Sometimes one have no choice. E.g. the company policy requires its
e
"Gokhan YESILYURT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My name is Gokhan YESILYURT from University of Michigan, Nuclear
> Engineering and Radiological Sciences. I have been working on
> debugging of the Cosign web login software for a long time so that I
> can prepare a debian package of this open source
Hello,
Libcddb is a small C library to access the CDDB server (Audio CD
database). Licence is LGPL
I've created a package for libcddb and am searching a sponsor for it.
The packages (libcddb0 and libcddb-dev) can be downloaded at
http://debian.zorglub.org/packages/libcddb
They are linda a
* Maciej Dems ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> Sometimes one have no choice. E.g. the company policy requires its
> employees to use Outlook (this is the case with my fiance).
I completly agree.
Sometimes we cannot be as *free* as we want ...
But this was a funny header in the context... :)
--
also sprach Clément Stenac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.21.1210 +0200]:
> Libcddb is a small C library to access the CDDB server (Audio CD
> database). Licence is LGPL
CDDB is non-free. Can this also access freedb.org instead? I would
suggest to use that as a default.
--
Please do not CC me whe
Patrze w ekran, a to Alexis Sukrieh pisze do mnie:
> > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
>
> Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
Sometimes one have no choice. E.g. the company policy requires its
e
Hello,
Libcddb is a small C library to access the CDDB server (Audio CD
database). Licence is LGPL
I've created a package for libcddb and am searching a sponsor for it.
The packages (libcddb0 and libcddb-dev) can be downloaded at
http://debian.zorglub.org/packages/libcddb
They are linda and li
Hello,
I'm looking for sponsor for the libmatheval package:
Name: libmatheval
License: GPL
Description: GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
expressions
GNU libmatheval is library comprising several procedures that makes
possible to create in-memory tree representation of mathemati
I have a silly little problem with getting Python's distutils to play
nice with Debian packaging. The library I am packaging (PyGGy) has a few
python files that double as executable scripts (in short they have '#!
/usr/bin/python' at the top of the file, while still being part of a
library, and the
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
"want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
Really fun :)
Anyway, good luck for your sponsor search, that's not that easy to find
one.
Alexis.
* Gokhan YESILYURT ([EMAI
Hi,
My name is Gokhan YESILYURT from University of Michigan, Nuclear
Engineering and Radiological Sciences. I have been working on debugging of the
Cosign web login software for a long time so that I can prepare a debian package of this open source software. Fortunately, the developers
Hello,
I'm looking for sponsor for the libmatheval package:
Name: libmatheval
License: GPL
Description: GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
expressions
GNU libmatheval is library comprising several procedures that makes
possible to create in-memory tree representation of mathemati
I have a silly little problem with getting Python's distutils to play
nice with Debian packaging. The library I am packaging (PyGGy) has a few
python files that double as executable scripts (in short they have '#!
/usr/bin/python' at the top of the file, while still being part of a
library, and the
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
"want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
Really fun :)
Anyway, good luck for your sponsor search, that's not that easy to find
one.
Alexis.
* Gokhan YESILYURT ([EMAI
72 matches
Mail list logo
