Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matthew Palmer:
>> I just had another thought -- make a -1 revision with an empty
>> diff. Weird, but I can't think of any reason why it wouldn't work...
> That usually works just fine, and it what I do when I release jwhois,
> since I have also been d
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267685
I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking for sponsorship.
My packages for the following are available at:
http://www.asciigirl.com/kubication/
It's my first complex package from the scratch . Plz, I need a sponsor
with lots of pati
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267685
I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking for sponsorship.
My packages for the following are available at:
http://www.asciigirl.com/kubication/
It's my first complex package from the scratch . Plz, I need a sponsor
with lots of pati
Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matthew Palmer:
>> I just had another thought -- make a -1 revision with an empty
>> diff. Weird, but I can't think of any reason why it wouldn't work...
> That usually works just fine, and it what I do when I release jwhois,
> since I have also been d
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267685
I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking for sponsorship.
My packages for the following are available at:
http://www.asciigirl.com/kubication/
It's my first complex package from the scratch . Plz, I need a sponsor
with lots of pati
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267685
I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking for sponsorship.
My packages for the following are available at:
http://www.asciigirl.com/kubication/
It's my first complex package from the scratch . Plz, I need a sponsor
with lots of pati
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Lintian complains:
>
> ln -sf ../share/doc/stress /usr/doc/stress,
I have updated to current debhelper and incremented package version to 0.18.2:
http://weather.ou.edu/~apw/projects/stress/#Debiandeb
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does anybody have an idea why apt decides "Holding Back tetex-bin rather
> > than change dvipdfm"?
>
> It seems it's an apt bug; after I put the tetex stuff on hold and
> dist-upgrade t
* Brian Sutherland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 11:08:48PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 04:48:37PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > .so files? Should it be libschoolbell and libschoolbell-dev?
> >
> > Indeed.
>
> These few .so files are impo
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Lintian complains:
>
> ln -sf ../share/doc/stress /usr/doc/stress,
I have updated to current debhelper and incremented package version to 0.18.2:
http://weather.ou.edu/~apw/projects/stress/#Debiandeb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does anybody have an idea why apt decides "Holding Back tetex-bin rather
> > than change dvipdfm"?
>
> It seems it's an apt bug; after I put the tetex stuff on hold and
> dist-upgrade t
* Brian Sutherland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 11:08:48PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 04:48:37PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > .so files? Should it be libschoolbell and libschoolbell-dev?
> >
> > Indeed.
>
> These few .so files are impo
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 11:08:48PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 04:48:37PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > .so files? Should it be libschoolbell and libschoolbell-dev?
>
> Indeed.
These few .so files are imported from zope and maybe slightly modified.
So there is prob
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 04:48:37PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> .so files? Should it be libschoolbell and libschoolbell-dev?
Indeed.
--
Brian Sutherland
"There has got to be more to life than just being really,
really, really, ridiculously good-looking." -- Derek Zoolander
All,
Hello, I have been having a hard time finding a sponsor for the
streamline package. I have never tired to get a package uploaded before
and it is totally possible that I am being way to impatient. Quite a
few people have helped me out on this list by correcting some errors in
my origin
* Brian Sutherland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:57:46PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I agree with this. Really, debian-native packages are debian-specific
> > packages. I would strongly encourage you to *not* make this a
> > debian-native package.
>
> Thanks to you
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:57:46PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I agree with this. Really, debian-native packages are debian-specific
> packages. I would strongly encourage you to *not* make this a
> debian-native package.
Thanks to you and the others on the list, now that I understand
the sit
Matthew Palmer:
I just had another thought -- make a -1 revision with an empty diff.
Weird, but I can't think of any reason why it wouldn't work...
That usually works just fine, and it what I do when I release jwhois, since
I have also been doing the upstream releases. The debian subdirectory
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 11:08:48PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 04:48:37PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > .so files? Should it be libschoolbell and libschoolbell-dev?
>
> Indeed.
These few .so files are imported from zope and maybe slightly modified.
So there is prob
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 04:48:37PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> .so files? Should it be libschoolbell and libschoolbell-dev?
Indeed.
--
Brian Sutherland
"There has got to be more to life than just being really,
really, really, ridiculously good-looking." -- Derek Zoolander
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
All,
Hello, I have been having a hard time finding a sponsor for the
streamline package. I have never tired to get a package uploaded before
and it is totally possible that I am being way to impatient. Quite a
few people have helped me out on this list by correcting some errors in
my original
* Brian Sutherland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:57:46PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I agree with this. Really, debian-native packages are debian-specific
> > packages. I would strongly encourage you to *not* make this a
> > debian-native package.
>
> Thanks to you
It seems that this is really an RFS, because .debs are provided.
Lintian complains:
ln -sf ../share/doc/stress /usr/doc/stress,
a line which is
# Automatically added by dh_installdocs
Indeed, you appear to be using an old debhelper:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0)
Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Subject: Re: RFS schoolbell - A calenaring server for schools
s/calenar/calendar/, or is this a new english word?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:57:46PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I agree with this. Really, debian-native packages are debian-specific
> packages. I would strongly encourage you to *not* make this a
> debian-native package.
Thanks to you and the others on the list, now that I understand
the sit
Source: stress
Section: devel
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Amos Waterland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0)
Standards-Version: 3.5.9
Package: stress
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Description: A tool which imposes stress on a system
'stress' is a tool which i
I have added the viewglob.desktop file provided by Stefan Fritsch for a
konsole session, and fixed all the compiler warnings. The new package
is at the same location as before. Any takers for sponsoring viewglob?
deb-src http://borex.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ unstable main
apt-get update
apt-get
Matthew Palmer:
I just had another thought -- make a -1 revision with an empty diff.
Weird, but I can't think of any reason why it wouldn't work...
That usually works just fine, and it what I do when I release jwhois, since
I have also been doing the upstream releases. The debian subdirectory is
Stephen Frost wrote:
> I agree with this. Really, debian-native packages are debian-specific
> packages. I would strongly encourage you to *not* make this a
> debian-native package.
I also agree. I am both upstream and Debian maintainer for my package,
and I find that a non-native package has
* Kevin B. McCarty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> > I just had another thought -- make a -1 revision with an empty diff. Weird,
> > but I can't think of any reason why it wouldn't work...
>
> Why would the diff be empty? I would think it should contain the debian
> subdi
Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I just had another thought -- make a -1 revision with an empty diff. Weird,
> but I can't think of any reason why it wouldn't work...
Why would the diff be empty? I would think it should contain the debian
subdir in any case. It makes no sense to ship a debian directory
It seems that this is really an RFS, because .debs are provided.
Lintian complains:
ln -sf ../share/doc/stress /usr/doc/stress,
a line which is
# Automatically added by dh_installdocs
Indeed, you appear to be using an old debhelper:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0)
Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Subject: Re: RFS schoolbell - A calenaring server for schools
s/calenar/calendar/, or is this a new english word?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Hi Stefan,
You wrote:
> that's a nice little program. Just one suggestion:
> Add a viewglob session type to the KDE konsole by including the
> file /usr/share/apps/konsole/viewglob.desktop
OK, I'll go ahead and add it. Have you tested it? I don't use KDE so
can't do so myself.
It will be a l
Source: stress
Section: devel
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Amos Waterland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0)
Standards-Version: 3.5.9
Package: stress
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Description: A tool which imposes stress on a system
'stress' is a tool which i
I have added the viewglob.desktop file provided by Stefan Fritsch for a
konsole session, and fixed all the compiler warnings. The new package
is at the same location as before. Any takers for sponsoring viewglob?
deb-src http://borex.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ unstable main
apt-get update
apt-get
Stephen Frost wrote:
> I agree with this. Really, debian-native packages are debian-specific
> packages. I would strongly encourage you to *not* make this a
> debian-native package.
I also agree. I am both upstream and Debian maintainer for my package,
and I find that a non-native package has
* Kevin B. McCarty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> > I just had another thought -- make a -1 revision with an empty diff. Weird,
> > but I can't think of any reason why it wouldn't work...
>
> Why would the diff be empty? I would think it should contain the debian
> subdi
Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I just had another thought -- make a -1 revision with an empty diff. Weird,
> but I can't think of any reason why it wouldn't work...
Why would the diff be empty? I would think it should contain the debian
subdir in any case. It makes no sense to ship a debian directory
Hi Stefan,
You wrote:
> that's a nice little program. Just one suggestion:
> Add a viewglob session type to the KDE konsole by including the
> file /usr/share/apps/konsole/viewglob.desktop
OK, I'll go ahead and add it. Have you tested it? I don't use KDE so
can't do so myself.
It will be a l
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody have an idea why apt decides "Holding Back tetex-bin rather
> than change dvipdfm"?
It seems it's an apt bug; after I put the tetex stuff on hold and
dist-upgrade the rest, it works fine.
Is there yet a draft for Release Notes for sarge?
T
Dear customer!
We updated our software catalogue and added new
popular products! Now you can get any software item
at 90% discount rate! For more information visit us here:
http://sanhedrin.infostech.info/index.php?s=4241
With best regards,
Product Manager
Muriel Walls
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 02:06:14PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 09:12:39PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On the whole, I think you've made a poor compromise. I would suggest
> > picking one way or the other, and going all the way with it. As it stands,
> > you're go
Hi,
tetex-bin previously only declared
Replaces:... dvipdfm
Provides: ... dvipdfm
but no Conflicts. This has the effect that dvipdfm is not removed when
tetex-bin is installed, and trying to remove afterwards fails because of
some dpkg-divert stuff (see #269235). Note that dvipdfm does no longe
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 09:12:39PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On the whole, I think you've made a poor compromise. I would suggest
> picking one way or the other, and going all the way with it. As it stands,
> you're going to have trouble uploading a -2 of anything without a new
> upstream ta
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:52:55PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> W: schoolbell source: native-package-with-dash-version
> The package releases for more than just debian. And sometimes it will be
> necessary to adjust the package only for debian but the debian directory
> is in the repository. S
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody have an idea why apt decides "Holding Back tetex-bin rather
> than change dvipdfm"?
It seems it's an apt bug; after I put the tetex stuff on hold and
dist-upgrade the rest, it works fine.
Is there yet a draft for Release Notes for sarge?
T
I am packaging schoolbell on behalf of upstream (Related to ITP#263088)
and seeking a sponsor.
Schoolbell is the first publicly available version of the Schooltool
server and is a stripped down version that only deals with
calendaring and scheduling between groups.
This is the first wider releas
Dear customer!
We updated our software catalogue and added new
popular products! Now you can get any software item
at 90% discount rate! For more information visit us here:
http://sanhedrin.infostech.info/index.php?s=4241
With best regards,
Product Manager
Muriel Walls
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 02:06:14PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 09:12:39PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On the whole, I think you've made a poor compromise. I would suggest
> > picking one way or the other, and going all the way with it. As it stands,
> > you're go
Hi,
tetex-bin previously only declared
Replaces:... dvipdfm
Provides: ... dvipdfm
but no Conflicts. This has the effect that dvipdfm is not removed when
tetex-bin is installed, and trying to remove afterwards fails because of
some dpkg-divert stuff (see #269235). Note that dvipdfm does no longe
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 09:12:39PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On the whole, I think you've made a poor compromise. I would suggest
> picking one way or the other, and going all the way with it. As it stands,
> you're going to have trouble uploading a -2 of anything without a new
> upstream ta
Hi Kevin,
that's a nice little program. Just one suggestion:
Add a viewglob session type to the KDE konsole by including the
file /usr/share/apps/konsole/viewglob.desktop
Cheers,
Stefan
--
viewglob.desktop
Description: application/desktop
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:52:55PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> W: schoolbell source: native-package-with-dash-version
> The package releases for more than just debian. And sometimes it will be
> necessary to adjust the package only for debian but the debian directory
> is in the repository. S
I am packaging schoolbell on behalf of upstream (Related to ITP#263088)
and seeking a sponsor.
Schoolbell is the first publicly available version of the Schooltool
server and is a stripped down version that only deals with
calendaring and scheduling between groups.
This is the first wider releas
Hi Kevin,
that's a nice little program. Just one suggestion:
Add a viewglob session type to the KDE konsole by including the
file /usr/share/apps/konsole/viewglob.desktop
Cheers,
Stefan
--
viewglob.desktop
Description: application/desktop
Hi Jurij,
On Wednesday 01 September 2004 12:48 am, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> I have a somewhat different impression, apache2 seems to have its share
> of problems. Debian's apache2 packages have seen 12 uploads during the
> last two months [0]
Yes, there was a botched and now reverted attempt at ena
57 matches
Mail list logo
