* Brian Sutherland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:57:46PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > I agree with this. Really, debian-native packages are debian-specific > > packages. I would strongly encourage you to *not* make this a > > debian-native package. > > Thanks to you and the others on the list, now that I understand > the situation better I realize that this makes my life *much* easier. > > However, I have another question. I can move almost everything to > schoolbell-common, the only things that are left in the schoolbell > package are a few .so files. Would it make more sense rather to > create a schoolbell-dep package with only the architecture few > dependent files? > > Would -dep be the right suffex?
.so files? Should it be libschoolbell and libschoolbell-dev?
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
