On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 01:29:50AM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> I think it should be in because its a nice toy and you can practise your
> math skills and your brain.
Not to mention that watching the binary digits tick over can be quite
hypnotic.
I have no particular need for a software binary cl
Hello.
I'm in the process of adopting the orphaned package git (GNU
Interactive Tools).
I'm looking for a sponsor, preferably someone who would be prepared to
advocate me if they are happy with my work.
I've fixed all the outstanding bugs in the BTS (apart from one
wishlist bug requesting unicod
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 01:29:50AM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> I think it should be in because its a nice toy and you can practise your
> math skills and your brain.
Not to mention that watching the binary digits tick over can be quite
hypnotic.
I have no particular need for a software binary cl
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-21 01:46]:
[...]
> You can find the files it under:
sorry, this is right:
> http://www.ngolde.de/debian/binclock_1.3-1.diff.gz
> http://www.ngolde.de/debian/binclock_1.3-1.dsc
> http://www.ngolde.de/debian/binclock_1.3-1_i386.deb
rega
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-21 01:46]:
[...]
> You can find the files it under:
sorry, this is right:
> http://www.ngolde.de/debian/binclock_1.3-1.diff.gz
> http://www.ngolde.de/debian/binclock_1.3-1.dsc
> http://www.ngolde.de/debian/binclock_1.3-1_i386.deb
rega
Hello I search a sponsor for my packet binclock.
I read more documentation and know the package is lintian bug free.
The package is provided under the GPL.
It displays system time in binary format
It supports showing the time with seven different colors, and it can
run a loop that prints the tim
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 19:26:32 +0100]:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:28:47AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
> > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 17:00:58 +0100]:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:05:15AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
> > > > Hello,
>
Hello I search a sponsor for my packet binclock.
I read more documentation and know the package is lintian bug free.
The package is provided under the GPL.
It displays system time in binary format
It supports showing the time with seven different colors, and it can
run a loop that prints the tim
Eike zyro Sauer wrote:
> Raphael Goulais schrieb:
> > - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since
> >the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't
> >think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge.
>
> Is this consensus?
> I thou
* Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 22:35:46 +0100]:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:36:33 -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
>
> > * Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 17:12:12 +0100]:
>
> > > I suggest to put 1.1.5 into unstable/testing and 1.2.0~cvs into
> > > experimental.
>
On 2004-02-20 Eike zyro Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raphael Goulais schrieb:
> > - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since
> >the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't
> >think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 19:26:32 +0100]:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:28:47AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
> > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 17:00:58 +0100]:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:05:15AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
> > > > Hello,
>
Raphael Goulais schrieb:
> - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since
>the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't
>think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge.
Is this consensus?
I thought I'd get rid of everything a packa
Eike zyro Sauer wrote:
> Raphael Goulais schrieb:
> > - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since
> >the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't
> >think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge.
>
> Is this consensus?
> I thou
* Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 22:35:46 +0100]:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:36:33 -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
>
> > * Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 17:12:12 +0100]:
>
> > > I suggest to put 1.1.5 into unstable/testing and 1.2.0~cvs into
> > > experimental.
>
On 2004-02-20 Eike zyro Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raphael Goulais schrieb:
> > - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since
> >the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't
> >think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge
Raphael Goulais schrieb:
> - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since
>the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't
>think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge.
Is this consensus?
I thought I'd get rid of everything a packa
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:28:47AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 17:00:58 +0100]:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:05:15AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm looking for a sponsor for uploading updated packages of scribus -
* Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 17:12:12 +0100]:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 17:00:58 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:05:15AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
>
> > > The latest scribus version in unstable is 1.1.4. I've been maintaining a
> > > private
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 17:00:58 +0100]:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:05:15AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm looking for a sponsor for uploading updated packages of scribus -
>
> I may be interested to sponsor this, but I will take a look at
> the
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:28:47AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 17:00:58 +0100]:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:05:15AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm looking for a sponsor for uploading updated packages of scribus -
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:05:15AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for uploading updated packages of scribus -
I may be interested to sponsor this, but I will take a look at
the packages first.
> the best Linux Desktop Publishing program. It's been orphaned by
Hello,
I'm looking for a sponsor for uploading updated packages of scribus -
the best Linux Desktop Publishing program. It's been orphaned by the
maintainer and I submitted an ITP after 3 weeks of wait or so. Scribus
is being very rapidly developed and offers features rivaling and in
some places s
> - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since
>the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't
>think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge.
The log used to be in /var/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log a long time ago, I
missed this. I agr
* Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 17:12:12 +0100]:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 17:00:58 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:05:15AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
>
> > > The latest scribus version in unstable is 1.1.4. I've been maintaining a
> > > private
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 17:00:58 +0100]:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:05:15AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm looking for a sponsor for uploading updated packages of scribus -
>
> I may be interested to sponsor this, but I will take a look at
> the
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:05:15AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for uploading updated packages of scribus -
I may be interested to sponsor this, but I will take a look at
the packages first.
> the best Linux Desktop Publishing program. It's been orphaned by
Hello,
I'm looking for a sponsor for uploading updated packages of scribus -
the best Linux Desktop Publishing program. It's been orphaned by the
maintainer and I submitted an ITP after 3 weeks of wait or so. Scribus
is being very rapidly developed and offers features rivaling and in
some places s
> - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since
>the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't
>think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge.
The log used to be in /var/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log a long time ago, I
missed this. I agr
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 11:39, Raphael Goulais wrote:
> Some remarks first :
And updating the standard version :)
Raphael
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 11:39, Raphael Goulais wrote:
> Some remarks first :
And updating the standard version :)
Raphael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 19:56, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the version 0.5-1 of cvs-autoreleasedeb
> that already is into the archive.
Some remarks first :
- Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since
the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleased
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 19:56, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the version 0.5-1 of cvs-autoreleasedeb
> that already is into the archive.
I'm can do it, if nobody replied to you before.
Raphael
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>Now, does the autobuilder get moved to another machine, or do I just put on
>>my scary face when adding people to the authorised uploaders list?
>
>
> If you are using i386: umlbuilder
>
> That way you need an uml exploit and a root exploit to use the uml
> exploi
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 19:56, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the version 0.5-1 of cvs-autoreleasedeb
> that already is into the archive.
Some remarks first :
- Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since
the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleased
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 19:56, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the version 0.5-1 of cvs-autoreleasedeb
> that already is into the archive.
I'm can do it, if nobody replied to you before.
Raphael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>Now, does the autobuilder get moved to another machine, or do I just put on
>>my scary face when adding people to the authorised uploaders list?
>
>
> If you are using i386: umlbuilder
>
> That way you need an uml exploit and a root exploit to use the uml
> exploi
37 matches
Mail list logo
