* Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 17:12:12 +0100]: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 17:00:58 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:05:15AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote: > > > > The latest scribus version in unstable is 1.1.4. I've been maintaining a > > > private repository for cvs builds for few weeks. Now that 1.1.5 is out > > > and the development is forging ahead to 1.2.0 I'd like to get 1.2.0.cvs > > > packages into unstable. > > > > Is the CVS version stable enough? With Sarge hopefully-not-so-far-away > > it would be good to know if you think that your version will be stable > > enough for a Debian stable release in time... Or if it would be better > > to get 1.1.5 in testing first before beginning with 1.2.0.cvs > > I suggest to put 1.1.5 into unstable/testing and 1.2.0~cvs into > experimental. > > Kind regards, > > Martin
Martin, CVS is stable. Frankly, the release is pretty much a CVS snapshot. 1.2.0 will be released around the end of April, so it will probably happen way before sarge is out. I think that the effort is better spent working out problems due to the clash of debian and upstream policy on executable libs and non-FHS file placement then on maintaining two separate versions. Please tell my why it is not so if you think contrary. Regards, Alex. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
