Folks,
I have packaged ASIS for GNAT 3.15p for Debian. Unfortunately, I've
already filled my private web site with Ada stuff and so I cannot
upload ASIS to it.
If someone is interested, please reply and I'll send the .debs to you
for review. Here is the list of files:
7273 2003-08-15
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:06:58AM +1000, Jason Thomas wrote:
> I've only looked at jabber-jit, but I see a couple of problems. It
> includes a copy of the jabber source in it. when it should use the
> jabber-dev package. I went through this same problem building the
> old icq transport for jabbe
i am seeking a sponsor for my [1]pgpdump (0.19-1) package.
pgpdump is a pgp packet visualizer, which is similar (but better) to
gpg's --list-packets command. sample output (dump of pgpdump's signed
.dsc file):
Old: Signature Packet(tag 2)(277 bytes)
Ver 3 - old
Hash material(5
I forgot to say another thing about the "GNU Ada Environment
Specification".
While I can live with /usr/share/ada/adainclude and
/usr/lib/ada/adalib, I definitely disagree with putting the libraries
in /usr/lib/ada/adalib. The Debian Policy clearly states that both
static and shared libraries mu
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > First, please note that Debian is the only distro that does not ship
> > shared libraries with the FSF variant of GNAT; all other distros agree
> > that shared libraries are a good thing.
>
> In fact, t
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:54:08PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> I hope that I've selected the correct debian mailing list for this
> question. But if not, I would appreciate if you could redirect properly.
Nope, this is the right spot.
> My first steps are proving to be quite haltingly slow. I'm
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 11:24:13AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 07:38:11PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > The things which absolutely have to be in a package in order to be
> > built are debian/rules and debian/control. debian/rules gives the
> > commands required to make
Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Your shared library support is probably incompatible with ACT's. Do
>> you really want to enable it by default?
>
> Well, yes, I would like to, especially since gnat 3.14p did, too.
Ah, let's keep the old mistakes. 8-)
> Could you shed some light on
I've only looked at jabber-jit, but I see a couple of problems. It includes a
copy of the jabber source in it. when it should use the jabber-dev package. I
went through this same problem building the old icq transport for jabber. It
seems upstream don't like to link outside the tarball.
and t
After having spent some time this week learning the very basics about
debian packaging, I wrote a simple (~ 2 pages) tutorial for others in
our software group to follow. A simplistic step-by-step guide without a
lot of explanation. And it only covers loading necessary packages,
dh_make, dpkg-bu
Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First, please note that Debian is the only distro that does not ship
> shared libraries with the FSF variant of GNAT; all other distros agree
> that shared libraries are a good thing.
In fact, the GNU Ada Environment specification I wrote strongly
reco
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:40:42PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> Ok, I've managed to create a .deb package, experimented with putting
> things in the rules file, installed my package locally. Learned a little
> about purge and kind of have the gist of what y'all have been trying to
> pound into my
On Ter, 2003-08-12 at 14:38, Eric Winger wrote:
> * all the deb-src entries i tried to add to my sources.list give me
> errors when I try to get the source. What is the url for sources? This
> is my latest attempt:
>
> deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian testing main contrib free
My sources.lis
After e-mailing the current maintainer several times over the last
month, and recieving no reply I have cleaned up my package for the new
upstream version og HMMER. The packages are almost linda + lintian
clean, the only complaints are that the *-pvm programs (which aren't
used by the user, they a
I'm looking for a sponsor for any one of three packages. I've requested a
sponsor for salonify several times in the past with no luck, so I thought
I'd try two new packages that perhaps will have broader appeal. They are
fairly simple programs and packages, and all pass linda and lintian. I
also h
Hi,
by the way, do you use "debuild" to build your package?
That way Debian will do some more checks before and after build like
build dependencies and lintian runs. Lintian will catch a lot of
little mistakes one can make like having *.ex files still in the
package. Listen to it.
MfG
Go
Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ok, I've managed to make a .deb file & a big ol tarball. Questions:
> * I thought that the .deb file would end up containing all of my
> * files, but the only thing that could possible hold my source is the
> * big tarball that dpkg-buildpackage built for
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Peter Nome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On a woody base install, I'm getting lots of post-installation script errors, like
this:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/sed.prerm: line 9: 653 Segmentation fault install-info
--quiet --remove sed
/var/lib/dpkg/info/sed.postinst: line 1
Hi people
I was searching for a package and I've found it. But it´s compiled for
Debian stable. I use Debian unstable and I would like to compile it for
my version of Debian.
How can I recompile it? I have those files:
program.diff.gz
program.dsc
program.changes
program.deb
program.orig.tar.gz
Hi, Josh Lauricha wrote:
> Should I just write a "Use foo not foo-pvm" man page for them or use an
> override or link to the correct programs to use? Not being a DD, I'm not
> certain which would be desired.
If these prgrams are not intended to be called by users, they belong in
/usr/lib/PACKAGE,
Steve Kemp wrote:
Unpacking the .orig.tar.gz only creates the directory of the program,
but without the debian/ directory. What do I have to do?
Unzip the 'program.diff.gz' file, and apply it with patch. This will
create the debian/ directory.
If you've got this from a stable archive I'm
oops, shouldn't have posted so soon. I found the dpkg -i .deb option.
I'll work through that. sorry
Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> thx to all for the responses. I'm slowly making progress here. Could
> someone distinguish the configuration se
Ok, I got a few more things understood including what directories get
built inside of debian, etc. So I think I understand better what is
being installed where, so again, disregard the last email.
I've gotten a package to correctly deliver a .bin to a folder &
successfully run that on install.
Ok, I've managed to create a .deb package, experimented with putting
things in the rules file, installed my package locally. Learned a little
about purge and kind of have the gist of what y'all have been trying to
pound into my head.
But now I've run into a problem. For my first package, which
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:11:00AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> Make sure you have installed the build-essential meta-package, it will
> download things the package maintainer has assumed you have.
> then,
> dpkg-source -x program.dsc
> cd program-1.2.3
(All correct, "apt-get source" was covered el
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:42:40PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> I was searching for a package and I've found it. But it?s compiled for
> Debian stable. I use Debian unstable and I would like to compile it for
> my version of Debian.
> How can I recompile it? I have those files:
> program
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Coin,
First of all, these kind of question as nothing to do in here.
Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If u get a bad request it is probably because webmin is using a secure connection
by default.
So, try : https://129.48.77.3:1
Duck
-BEGIN PGP
I'm looking for a sponsor for a package I've been maintaining outside of
the distribution since Sept 2002. wmDrawer[1] is a WindowMaker dockapp
that provides a retractable button bar used to launch applications.
Maybe you've used it? Maybe you'd like to use it? I use it religiously,
and think it
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:36:52AM +0200, Carlos Fuster wrote:
> I've just adopted an orphaned package, anyone can explain me when does the
> package change from the
> # Orphaned packages list
> to # Packages currently being adopted list.
>
> I'm a little confused about the Debian NM syst
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:42:40PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> I was searching for a package and I've found it. But it´s compiled for
> Debian stable. I use Debian unstable and I would like to compile it for
> my version of Debian.
> How can I recompile it? I have those files:
> progra
you missing dev packages from the Build-Depends it needs to be as below:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libgdk-pixbuf-dev, docbook-to-man
libgdk-libgdk-dev depends on the other things you need.
you probably also want to update your Standards-Version see
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgradi
I'm hoping that one (or more) of the DDs here might be willing to
sponsor one (or more) of the following packages. All of these have
either an RFP or ITP filed for them. I have updated the ITP entries
that where not filed by me and asked to assume the ITP, Evan (the
original ITP filer in both cas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Quack,
Some days ago i made a RFS for SLune, a 3D racing and car-crashing game.
Only two days after this RFS python started to migrate to 2.3, so my
packages are uninstallable due to missing dependancies, so i've got to
wait a bit before rebuilding t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Quack,
I wish u success in ur struggle to find a sponsor.
Everybody here seems to be on hollydays, we should stay patient.
Quackquack to u !
Duck
P.S. : i don't c the point of creating/finalizing, could u add a full exemple
with explanations in
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> The users will receive annoying warnings from ldconfig, so this is not
> >> an option.
> >
> > I tried it on the binary distribution of GNAT 3.15p. I did not get
> > any warnings:
>
> Hmm, I can't rep
On Sunday 10 August 2003 15:14, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> Any comments on this? Am I making wrong assumptions here? My
> understanding is that one should avoid /usr/X11R6/bin when possible, and
> that's what I'm trying to accomplish.
>
basically you are correct. Pretty much everything is dropped
I've been able to build a package, install it, get a postinst script to
run properly. Now, I'm at the point in my little test where
understanding where everything goes during install is important.
I'm moving away from using New Deb Maintainer docs and trying to follow
advice given in this forum
Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ahh, this brings up a point that has bothered me about debian. Well
> actually in this case, two points.
>
> * all the deb-src entries i tried to add to my sources.list give me
> * errors when I try to get the source. What is the url for sources?
> * This
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Your shared library support is probably incompatible with ACT's. Do
> >> you really want to enable it by default?
> >
> > Well, yes, I would like to, especially since gnat 3.14p did, too.
>
> Ah, let
On Wed 14:06, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> If these prgrams are not intended to be called by users, they belong in
> /usr/lib/PACKAGE, not /usr/bin.
This would be desireable, however they need to be in $PATH so that
they can be called by PVM. If I put them here I either need to hack the
program, or
Eric Winger wrote:
> would it be sacreligious to ask why sources are kept in non-free?
You are asking an obvious question and the answer is the obvious one.
The sources are in non-free because they are not free. Look at the
copyrights of any of the packages in non-free and you will see that
they
Peter Nome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On a woody base install, I'm getting lots of post-installation script errors, like
> this:
>
> # dpkg -i sed_3.02-8_i386.deb
> (Reading database ... 6623 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace sed 3.02-8 (using sed_3.02-8_i386.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:40:42PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> I've modified the postinst.ex file, but my commands aren't being
> executed. And the Debian New Maintainers' Guide says I shouldn't do this
> (add to maintainer scripts) yet. So that tells me I should be putting my
> configuration co
On Sunday 10 August 2003 09:50 am, ivan onyadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ivan
onyadi) wrote:
> First of all I want to send greetings to you all .Let me first introduce
> myself to you I am a Ugandan by nationality a, a student of KIGEZI HIGH
> SCHOOL ,P.O BOX 58 KABALE,UGANDA ,E.A. and a total orphan
should have added that I also tried the fakeroot /debian/rules binary to
build the .deb, but it just told me that it didn't find a file on a line
that didn't exist in my /rules file.
eric
Winger, Eric wrote:
thx to all for the responses. I'm slowly making progress here. Could
someone distingui
On a woody base install, I'm getting lots of post-installation script errors, like
this:
# dpkg -i sed_3.02-8_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 6623 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace sed 3.02-8 (using sed_3.02-8_i386.deb) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/sed.prerm: line 9: 65
Hi all,
I am preparing new Debian packages for CMS Midgard.
My idea is to let users manage with their databases and hosts
with debconf and dpkg instead of writing one config and postinst
for setup and updates and another one tools for managing existing
ones in a future. So simply I would like to
I've just adopted an orphaned package, anyone can explain me when does the
package change from the
# Orphaned packages list
to # Packages currently being adopted list.
I'm a little confused about the Debian NM system. I'm going to work on my
package, when that would be done, I'll have to ask
Hi.
Carlos Fuster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I've just adopted an orphaned package, anyone can explain me when does the
>package change from the
># Orphaned packages list
>to # Packages currently being adopted list.
After you retitle the apropriate bug. (Or if you do an upload, closing the bug
r
Duck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> P.S. : i don't c the point of creating/finalizing, could u add a full exemple
> with explanations in ur pkg ?
Yep. I'm thinking about some more docs than the manpage.
The short version follows.
"create" creates a subdir with the loopback file, the mountpoint
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm updating the build depends in some of my packages, along with the
standards version to bring them current with debian policy, and I get
this error.
Now running lintian...
W: libwww-curl-perl source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0
Finished running l
Hello all,
I'm maintaining a rather small program, root-tail, which puts it's
binary in /usr/X11R6/bin/, for (AFAICT) no particularly good reason.
There is an Imakefile that is part of the original distribution, but
somewhere along the line, someone wrote a standard Makefile for it (this
program h
Peter Nome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On a woody base install, I'm getting lots of post-installation script errors, like
> this:
>
> # dpkg -i sed_3.02-8_i386.deb
> (Reading database ... 6623 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace sed 3.02-8 (using sed_3.02-8_i386.
Description: Parity Archive v2
This utility applies the data-recover capability concepts of RAID-like
systems to individual and multiple files. It is most commonly used in
the posting and recovery of multipart archives on Usenet.
.
It supports the 'Reed-Soloman Code' implementation that allow
I'm hoping that one (or more) of the DDs here might be willing to
sponsor one (or more) of the following packages. All of these have
either an RFP or ITP filed for them. I have updated the ITP entries
that where not filed by me and asked to assume the ITP, Evan (the
original ITP filer in both cas
ok, I've managed to make a .deb file & a big ol tarball. Questions:
* I would like to test install this package but not go through the
apt-get stuff, because i believe it goes to sources.list etc. Is there a
simple way to simulate this load to see if my commands run successfully?
Or even load t
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 03:11:53PM -0400, Deedra Waters wrote:
> I'm updating the build depends in some of my packages, along with the
> standards version to bring them current with debian policy, and I get
> this error.
>
> Now running lintian...
> W: libwww-curl-perl source: newer-standards-vers
Hi, I'm still looking for a sponsor for debix-imager.
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Debix-imager
>
>
> Debix-imager is a setuid binary that allows a user to create a
> loopback file, format it with the filesystem of his choice and install
> the contents of a tar
Hi,
This is my third or fourth attempt to find a sponsor for the
python-albatross package. So far, I've been contacted by one developer
who was interested in sponsoring the package; he never replied to my
reply, however, so I assume he has other things to do at the moment.
Meanwhile, I'm continuin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Goswin,
I can't sponsor you but I'm happy to help you with the:
* changelog
* man pages
I am not trying to sound rude but there are some obvious spelling errors in
them and I think I could help ;-)
DSL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 08:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster)
wrote:
> Sorry, I messed things up: This I had found out yet, by the same
> way. However, /etc/init.d/hostname.sh is from sysvinit, and I
> couldn't find the place where the rcS.d-lin
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 11:53:27AM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >That's correct except that you want "non-free" there, not "free".
> >(Ever think you'd hear a Debian developer say that?)
>
> would it be sacreligious to ask why sources are kept in non-free?
I think one of us
New on my web site (http://users.skynet.be/ludovic.brenta):
* gnat-3.15p-2 takes into account Florian's remarks, except for the soname
of the shared libraries. I explained the reason for this in a previous
post.
* gnat-glade-3.15p-1, the distributed systems annex for GNAT.
* gnat-glade-doc
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 11:34, Celso González wrote:
> I have filled a ITP a few days ago and now i have a preliminary package
> (lintian & linda ok) available in
> http://bulmalug.net/~perroverde/debian
The init script is kinda broken, see the attached patch.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ De
Hi.
Chris Wesley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Jason Thomas wrote:
>> libgdk-libgdk-dev depends on the other things you need.
>Thanks for the tip! I also have libgd2-xpm listed a build dep. I didn't
>find a reverse dependency for it from libgdk-pixbuf-dev's chain of
>dependen
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Jason Thomas wrote:
> you missing dev packages from the Build-Depends it needs to be as below:
>
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libgdk-pixbuf-dev, docbook-to-man
>
> libgdk-libgdk-dev depends on the other things you need.
Thanks for the tip! I also have libgd2-xpm li
Matthew Palmer wrote:
The easiest way for packages in the actual archive is to run 'apt-get
source
'. That'll download the sources and unpack them into the
current
directory.
Ahh, this brings up a point that has bothered me about debian. Well
actually in this case, two points.
* all the de
Colin Watson wrote:
That's correct except that you want "non-free" there, not "free".
(Ever think you'd hear a Debian developer say that?)
would it be sacreligious to ask why sources are kept in non-free?
I found it easiest (years ago) to read the sources.list(5) man page and
learn how those
I installed webmin via Apt and it's running on my system...but when I open
my browser to http://129.48.77.3:1 I get bad request. I also tried my
machine name, instead of the IP.
Any suggestions?
dweezil
_
MSN 8 with e-mail vir
Hi.
Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Sorry, I messed things up: This I had found out yet, by the same
>way. However, /etc/init.d/hostname.sh is from sysvinit, and I couldn't
>find the place where the rcS.d-link to hostname.sh is made, neiter in
>sysvinit's postinst nor in debootstrap.
Hu?
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> thx to all for the responses. I'm slowly making progress here. Could
> someone distinguish the configuration section and how that applies to
> debian packages for me (the eternal newbie).
There are several "configuration sections" yo
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:42:40PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> I was searching for a package and I've found it. But it?s compiled for
> Debian stable. I use Debian unstable and I would like to compile it for
> my version of Debian.
> How can I recompile it? I have those files:
> progra
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 10:38:06AM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
> >The easiest way for packages in the actual archive is to run 'apt-get
> >source '. That'll download the sources and unpack them into
> >the current directory.
>
> Ahh, this brings up a point that has bothered
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:40:42PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> Any ideas? Or is the postinst.ex file correct, and i may be not writing
> the script correctly. I just added:
>
> cp myFile /hardcoded path/
> ./path/myFile (wishing to run that file)
.ex stands for example. remove the .ex.
I sugges
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hi,
by the way, do you use "debuild" to build your package?
I'm using dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
That way Debian will do some more checks before and after build like
build dependencies and lintian runs. Lintian will catch a lot of
little mistakes one can make lik
Re: RFS : Slune and dependencies [Duck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at
06:36:53PM +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> My gnupg key has already been signed.
I can't find it on the keyservers.
Maybe you could also include your real name in your mails.
Christoph
--
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROT
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Dweeil Brock wrote:
> I installed webmin via Apt and it's running on my system...but when I open
> my browser to http://129.48.77.3:1 I get bad request. I also tried my
> machine name, instead of the IP.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> dweezil
>
Read the friendly documentation?
Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> You should bump Standards-Version to the most recent one (after
>> checking that no changes are necessay).
>
> OK, will do. I was wondering where I could find a diff between
> various Standards-Versions
Hi,
I have a package which has an init script that depends on beeing called
after /etc/rcS.d/S40hostname but before /etc/rcS.d/S40networking. No
problem, by lucky chance it's name is netenv...
Now I would like to make sure that the order of the scripts didn't
change in recent unstable. This is pr
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 02:58:33PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> i am seeking a sponsor for my [1]pgpdump (0.19-1) package.
>
> pgpdump is a pgp packet visualizer, which is similar (but better) to
> gpg's --list-packets command. sample output (dump of pgpdump's signed
> .dsc file):
>
> Old: Sign
thx to all for the responses. I'm slowly making progress here. Could
someone distinguish the configuration section and how that applies to
debian packages for me (the eternal newbie).
I was under the impression that the configuration rules were what the
package would run after it was loaded. Ho
Hello,
I am seeking for a sponsor for arp-sk:
Package: arp-sk
Version: 0.0.15-1
Section: net
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
License: GPL
Upstream Author: Frédéric Raynal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Upstream web: http://www.arp-sk.org
Description: A swiss knife tool for ARP
Arp-sk is a tool that a
Arnaud Vandyck dijo [Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 10:57:31PM +0200]:
> > > > Unpacking the .orig.tar.gz only creates the directory of the
> > > > program, but without the debian/ directory. What do I have to do?
> > > Unzip the 'program.diff.gz' file, and apply it with patch. This
> > > will cre
Hello,
We have a debian package for pyduali (Arabic Spellchecker) and we are looking
for someone to sponsor it. I have been told to ask here first, so here I am ;)
Here is the debian bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=202940
Regards,
Mohamemd Elzubeir
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) schrieb:
> and pbuilder has been failing to
> build a sid chroot for a couple of days (because there is no
> console-tools-libs in sid currently, it seems).
Forget that. pbuilder create fails, but upgrading from a woody-base.tgz
to a sid-base.tgz seems to work.
S
"Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was searching for a package and I've found it. But it´s compiled for
> Debian stable. I use Debian unstable and I would like to compile it
> for my version of Debian.
> How can I recompile it? I have those files:
> program.diff.gz
> program.d
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:11:52 -0300
"Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Kemp wrote:
> >
> > > Unpacking the .orig.tar.gz only creates the directory of the
> > > program, but without the debian/ directory. What do I have to do?
> > Unzip the 'program.diff.gz' file, an
New on my web site (http://users.skynet.be/ludovic.brenta):
* gnat-3.15p-2 takes into account Florian's remarks, except for the soname
of the shared libraries. I explained the reason for this in a previous
post.
* gnat-glade-3.15p-1, the distributed systems annex for GNAT.
* gnat-glade-doc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Quack,
Some days ago i made a RFS for SLune, a 3D racing and car-crashing game.
Only two days after this RFS python started to migrate to 2.3, so my
packages are uninstallable due to missing dependancies, so i've got to
wait a bit before rebuilding t
Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The real problem is the soname. I'm willing to change the soname to
> "libgnat-3.15p.so" (removing the .1) to become more compatible with
> ACT's GNAT, but does that violate the Debian Policy?
The users will receive annoying warnings from ldconfig, so
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 05:20:46PM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> This is my third or fourth attempt to find a sponsor for the
> python-albatross package. So far, I've been contacted by one developer
> who was interested in sponsoring the package; he never replied to my
> reply, however, so I ass
pbuilders a great tool for figuring out your build-dependencies.
basically if you haven't got them right it won't build :-)
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 01:23:29AM -0700, Chris Wesley wrote:
> Thanks for the tip! I also have libgd2-xpm listed a build dep. I didn't
> find a reverse dependency for it
pbuilders a great tool for figuring out your build-dependencies.
basically if you haven't got them right it won't build :-)
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 01:23:29AM -0700, Chris Wesley wrote:
> Thanks for the tip! I also have libgd2-xpm listed a build dep. I didn't
> find a reverse dependency for it
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I'm still looking for a sponsor for debix-imager.
>
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Debix-imager
> >
> >
> > Debix-imager is a setuid binary that allows a user to create a
> > loopback file, format it with
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:36:52AM +0200, Carlos Fuster wrote:
> I've just adopted an orphaned package, anyone can explain me when does the
> package change from the
> # Orphaned packages list
> to # Packages currently being adopted list.
>
> I'm a little confused about the Debian NM syst
Hi.
Carlos Fuster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I've just adopted an orphaned package, anyone can explain me when does the
>package change from the
># Orphaned packages list
>to # Packages currently being adopted list.
After you retitle the apropriate bug. (Or if you do an upload, closing the bug
r
Hi.
Chris Wesley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Jason Thomas wrote:
>> libgdk-libgdk-dev depends on the other things you need.
>Thanks for the tip! I also have libgd2-xpm listed a build dep. I didn't
>find a reverse dependency for it from libgdk-pixbuf-dev's chain of
>dependen
I've just adopted an orphaned package, anyone can explain me when does the
package change from the
# Orphaned packages list
to # Packages currently being adopted list.
I'm a little confused about the Debian NM system. I'm going to work on my
package, when that would be done, I'll have to ask
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Jason Thomas wrote:
> you missing dev packages from the Build-Depends it needs to be as below:
>
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libgdk-pixbuf-dev, docbook-to-man
>
> libgdk-libgdk-dev depends on the other things you need.
Thanks for the tip! I also have libgd2-xpm li
you missing dev packages from the Build-Depends it needs to be as below:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libgdk-pixbuf-dev, docbook-to-man
libgdk-libgdk-dev depends on the other things you need.
you probably also want to update your Standards-Version see
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgradi
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
