Hi. Chris Wesley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Jason Thomas wrote: >> libgdk-libgdk-dev depends on the other things you need.
>Thanks for the tip! I also have libgd2-xpm listed a build dep. I didn't >find a reverse dependency for it from libgdk-pixbuf-dev's chain of >dependencies, so I kept its entry. If you're necessarily depending on dev-packages, it seems to be good practice to include them as a dependency and not count on other packages' build dependencies [0]. Cheers T. 0. e.g. at <http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2002/debian-mentors-200209/msg00003.html> there is a 4-1 majority in favor of explicit dependencies. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
