> Pdsh is a high-performance, parallel remote shell utility. It has
> built-in, thread-safe clients for Berkeley and Kerberos V4 rsh, and can
> call SSH externally (though with reduced performance). Pdsh uses a
> "sliding window" parallel algorithm to conserve socket resources on the
> initiating n
> Pdsh is a high-performance, parallel remote shell utility. It has
> built-in, thread-safe clients for Berkeley and Kerberos V4 rsh, and can
> call SSH externally (though with reduced performance). Pdsh uses a
> "sliding window" parallel algorithm to conserve socket resources on the
> initiating n
hello sergio!
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 04:40:08PM +0200, Sergio Suarez wrote:
> I have a new package for zed (1.0.5-9) here:
>
> htpp://80.34.20.197
>
> and I need a sponsor for check it and upload it
--19:45:26-- http://80.34.20.197/zed_1.0.5.orig.tar.gz
=> `zed_1.0.5.orig.tar.gz'
Quoting Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2003-07-18 15:11:13 BST):
> Hi
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for since (see
> http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
>
> Description: tail(1) work-alike that saves and uses state information
> since is a tail(1) work-alike that remembers how much of a
hello sergio!
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 04:40:08PM +0200, Sergio Suarez wrote:
> I have a new package for zed (1.0.5-9) here:
>
> htpp://80.34.20.197
>
> and I need a sponsor for check it and upload it
--19:45:26-- http://80.34.20.197/zed_1.0.5.orig.tar.gz
=> `zed_1.0.5.orig.tar.gz'
Hi.
Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I am looking for a sponsor for since (see
>http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
I'm not an expert, but how about pointing out that you're intending to adopt the
orphaned package since and that you have added the (previously lacking)
build-dependency
I have a new package for zed (1.0.5-9) here:
htpp://80.34.20.197
and I need a sponsor for check it and upload it
Zed is a powerfull,multipurpose text editor:
- Can use ANY key sequence (e.g. define a block with shift-arrow) even
on the console.
- Intelligent screen update (NOT using the s
Hello,
I like to make a debian package an maintain it for my ftp.proxy project and
now I am looking for a sponsor for my package.
The package is already done, so I think there will be much work for the
sponsor!
Here is a short description of ftp.proxy:
ftp.proxy is an application level gat
Hi
I am looking for a sponsor for since (see
http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Description: tail(1) work-alike that saves and uses state information
since is a tail(1) work-alike that remembers how much of a file
you have viewed and displays only what's new when you next view
that fil
Quoting Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2003-07-18 15:11:13 BST):
> Hi
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for since (see http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
>
> Description: tail(1) work-alike that saves and uses state information
> since is a tail(1) work-alike that remembers how much of a fil
Hi.
Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I am looking for a sponsor for since (see http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
I'm not an expert, but how about pointing out that you're intending to adopt the
orphaned package since and that you have added the (previously lacking)
build-dependency th
I have a new package for zed (1.0.5-9) here:
htpp://80.34.20.197
and I need a sponsor for check it and upload it
Zed is a powerfull,multipurpose text editor:
- Can use ANY key sequence (e.g. define a block with shift-arrow) even
on the console.
- Intelligent screen update (NOT using the s
Hello,
I like to make a debian package an maintain it for my ftp.proxy project and
now I am looking for a sponsor for my package.
The package is already done, so I think there will be much work for the
sponsor!
Here is a short description of ftp.proxy:
ftp.proxy is an application level gatewa
Hi
I am looking for a sponsor for since (see http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Description: tail(1) work-alike that saves and uses state information
since is a tail(1) work-alike that remembers how much of a file
you have viewed and displays only what's new when you next view
that file
hi,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:58:02PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> You don't upload yourself, you get a DD to do it on your behalf. Basically,
> you put the packages up somewhere (or offer to e-mail to interested parties,
> if you have no webspace), and e-mail here saying "I'd like a sponsor f
"Thomas Viehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>So you think it doesn't matter wether there's two packages named agrep
>>in non-free?
> What do you mean, two packages named agrep?
> Clearly, Luk is seeking a sponsor for his ITA (cf. #201367).
Oh, excuse
hi,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:58:02PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> You don't upload yourself, you get a DD to do it on your behalf. Basically,
> you put the packages up somewhere (or offer to e-mail to interested parties,
> if you have no webspace), and e-mail here saying "I'd like a sponsor f
Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>So you think it doesn't matter wether there's two packages named agrep
>in non-free?
What do you mean, two packages named agrep?
Clearly, Luk is seeking a sponsor for his ITA (cf. #201367).
Cheers
T.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 02:15:53AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> First a bug says:
> * #143670: fda: Upstream location is bogus
>
> I've checked the location, it's not there anymore.
> Look for a new web , and I only found references to the Debian archive.
> I have contacted the upstream a
"Thomas Viehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>So you think it doesn't matter wether there's two packages named agrep
>>in non-free?
> What do you mean, two packages named agrep?
> Clearly, Luk is seeking a sponsor for his ITA (cf. #201367).
Oh, excuse
I'm adopting fda package. I've checked the bugs and they
are not difficult to solve but I need some 'answers'.
First a bug says:
* #143670: fda: Upstream location is bogus
I've checked the location, it's not there anymore.
Look for a new web , and I only found references to the Debian archi
Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>So you think it doesn't matter wether there's two packages named agrep
>in non-free?
What do you mean, two packages named agrep?
Clearly, Luk is seeking a sponsor for his ITA (cf. #201367).
Cheers
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 02:15:53AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> First a bug says:
> * #143670: fda: Upstream location is bogus
>
> I've checked the location, it's not there anymore.
> Look for a new web , and I only found references to the Debian archive.
> I have contacted the upstream a
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> > mizar:[~] apt-cache show agrep G Section
>> > Section: non-free/text
>> >
>> > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resourc
I'm adopting fda package. I've checked the bugs and they
are not difficult to solve but I need some 'answers'.
First a bug says:
* #143670: fda: Upstream location is bogus
I've checked the location, it's not there anymore.
Look for a new web , and I only found references to the Debian archive.
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> > mizar:[~] apt-cache show agrep G Section
>> > Section: non-free/text
>> >
>> > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resourc
26 matches
Mail list logo
