On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 23:50 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> but, next time, please don't all-caps-ify the subject.
It wasn't me. Please, look at the first message of this thread and see
who is responsible for doing that.
Kind regards,
Aníbal
--
.''`. Debian GNU/Linux | Building 2
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:58:06AM +1000, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 21:45 +0200, Sergio Suarez wrote:
> > Hi Im new in debian develop and want adopt the orphan package zed, I =
> > need a sponsor
> >
> > Package name: zed
> > Package description: Powerful, multipurpo
Hi, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> Read the developer's reference, repackage zed and you will be ready to ask
> for a sponsor.
... but, next time, please don't all-caps-ify the subject.
Thanks.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote
--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 23:50 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> but, next time, please don't all-caps-ify the subject.
It wasn't me. Please, look at the fir
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 21:45 +0200, Sergio Suarez wrote:
> Hi Im new in debian develop and want adopt the orphan package zed, I =
> need a sponsor
>
> Package name: zed
> Package description: Powerful, multipurpose, configurable text editor
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=3
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:58:06AM +1000, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 21:45 +0200, Sergio Suarez wrote:
> > Hi Im new in debian develop and want adopt the orphan package zed, I =
> > need a sponsor
> >
> > Package name: zed
> > Package description: Powerful, multipurpo
Hi, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> Read the developer's reference, repackage zed and you will be ready to ask
> for a sponsor.
... but, next time, please don't all-caps-ify the subject.
Thanks.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 21:45 +0200, Sergio Suarez wrote:
> Hi Im new in debian develop and want adopt the orphan package zed, I =
> need a sponsor
>
> Package name: zed
> Package description: Powerful, multipurpose, configurable text editor
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=3
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:03:36PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Matt Ryan wrote:
> > Adam Heath wrote:
> > > On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2000-12-17 - Eray Ozkural <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilk
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> >
> > > 2000-12-17 - Eray Ozkural <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilkent.edu.tr
> > >* DAM Comment: Have asked applicant to get 5 sponso
Hi !
A license change in kanjidic and edict packages will allow
them to move to main. Also, xjdic which is in contrib will
also move to main (and maybe other packages depending on
edict and kanjidic).
I've uploaded the new edict package yesterday, and I received
a message saying that 'edict is n
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:03:36PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Matt Ryan wrote:
> > Adam Heath wrote:
> > > On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2000-12-17 - Eray Ozkural <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilk
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> >
> > > 2000-12-17 - Eray Ozkural <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilkent.edu.tr
> > >* DAM Comment: Have asked applicant to get 5 sponso
Hi !
A license change in kanjidic and edict packages will allow
them to move to main. Also, xjdic which is in contrib will
also move to main (and maybe other packages depending on
edict and kanjidic).
I've uploaded the new edict package yesterday, and I received
a message saying that 'edict is new
Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Well I know all this. But I ment I want to have more information how it
>will practically go. Does the patent problems have any implication on the
>upload (to non-free)?
Yes.
>What am I supposed to do with the package or the patent issues?
See if the package w
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:54:32PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > > Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
> > >
> > > A little bit more information would be appreciated.
> >
> > Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
> >
> >
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > mizar:[~] apt-cache show agrep G Section
> > Section: non-free/text
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s4.6.1
>
> So what? In the first sentence
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
> >
> > A little bit more information would be appreciated.
>
> Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
>
> Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
> infrastruct
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> > > There is an agrep package already in Debian:
>> > >
>> > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
>
> A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
infrastructure.
- Matt
>> Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
>A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Please make yourself familiar with some of the ideas behind Debian. (Read the
Social
Contract, DFSG, ...)
agrep is in non-free, non-free is not part of Debian as is explained in the
social
contract
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > There is an agrep package already in Debian:
> > >
> > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
>
> Of course it is this package.
>
> > Huh? This
> > There is an agrep package already in Debian:
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Of course it is this package.
> Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be
Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Well I know all this. But I ment I want to have more information how it
>will practically go. Does the patent problems have any implication on the
>upload (to non-free)?
Yes.
>What am I supposed to do with the package or the patent issues?
See if the package w
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:54:32PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > > Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
> > >
> > > A little bit more information would be appreciated.
> >
> > Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
> >
> >
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:50:18PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> >
> > > 2000-12-17 - Eray Ozkural <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilkent.edu.tr
> > >* DAM Comment: Have asked appli
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > mizar:[~] apt-cache show agrep G Section
> > Section: non-free/text
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s4.6.1
>
> So what? In the first sentence
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
> >
> > A little bit more information would be appreciated.
>
> Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
>
> Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
> infrastruct
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:04:12PM +0800, Wang WenRui wrote:
> There is an agrep package already in Debian:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
Hi,
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Is this the same as yours?
Best regards
Wang WenRui
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
>
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> > > There is an agrep package already in Debian:
>> > >
>> > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
>
> A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
infrastructure.
- Matt
>> Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
>A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Please make yourself familiar with some of the ideas behind Debian. (Read the Social
Contract, DFSG, ...)
agrep is in non-free, non-free is not part of Debian as is explained in the social
contract (
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > There is an agrep package already in Debian:
> > >
> > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
>
> Of course it is this package.
>
> > Huh? This
> > There is an agrep package already in Debian:
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Of course it is this package.
> Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:50:18PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> >
> > > 2000-12-17 - Eray Ozkural <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilkent.edu.tr
> > >* DAM Comment: Have asked appli
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:04:12PM +0800, Wang WenRui wrote:
> There is an agrep package already in Debian:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCR
Hi,
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Is this the same as yours?
Best regards
Wang WenRui
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
>
Hi,
Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Doesn't work, changes in the script are needed because of the new
> parameter syntax.
What do you mean, "doesn't work"? I changed the script to conform to the new
parameter syntax -- packaging things which aren't tested and can't work isn't
my style. ;-)
The script d
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 21:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, this thread should probably be on newmaint, so I'm cross-posting
> it there. Please follow-up on newmaint.
Replied to debian-newmaint@lists.debian.org, Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpbV9LOVYaBg.pgp
De
40 matches
Mail list logo
