-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2003 16:43 schrieb Christoph Berg:
> Re: Advice needed for packaging sigcperl library and SigC perl
> module [Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wed, May 14, 2003 at
> 03:36:08PM +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>
> > - libsigcperl-0.2 (
"Matthias Hofer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. (*) text/plain ( ) text/html
Please send only plain text email to the mailing list.
>> >what can I do?
>>
>> I think this means that you need (a more recent version of) GNU
> automake.
>> What version do you have, if an
I've been waiting for an update to Debian's package of ntaim for awhile
and since it finally got orphaned I want to take it over.
I already have a working package based on the 1045466052 release from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/tame/ I should have it uploaded to m.d.n
whenever they activate my
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 09:26:13AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> I would strongly suggest that you use a write-only "incoming", and a
> signature checker which moves packages to the download area if they're OK.
>
> That checker should do the following:
> - start wit
05/14/2003 09:29 AM The original attachment contains a virus or meets the
File-Blocking rules. ScanMail took action: Q231893.exe/Moved, please see your
Exchange Server administrator for details!
Re: Advice needed for packaging sigcperl library and SigC perl module [Michael
Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:36:08PM +0200, <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>]
> - libsigcperl-0.2 (the helper library)
> - libsigcperl-dev (the development files)
> - libsigc-perl (its a binary perl module)
Wh
* Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> /usr/lib/eclipse and then set symlinks to the 'expected' places in
>> /usr/share/eclipse subdirs.
> That sounds fine. It would be even better if eclipse would look in FHSish
> locations for these things, but symlinks are OK.
Ok, so I will restructure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I packaging eris, a library for comminucating with game servers. The
new upstream versions includes perl bindings so I wanted to put them
into a new deb too.
Infortunately the perl bindings depend on the SigC perl module and a
helper lib
Hi, Colin Watson wrote:
>> Perhaps an easy thing to do would just be to show whether or not a
>> pckage is signed by a key which is signed by a real debian developer.
>> Ie, use the web of trust. Then at least one can be reasonable sure that
>> the maintainer is real.
>
> Surely getting that si
Hi, Paul Hampson wrote:
> I just want to clarify this, since the Developer's Reference
> doesn't really specify... Do I have to be a DD to file an ITA?
>
No.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Consulting @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http:/
> > what can I do?
>
> I think this means that you need (a more recent version of) GNU automake.
> What version do you have, if any?
I have 1.4-p4-1.1 (from woody).
> BTW, if you haven't been able to compile it, why do you say it is the best
> package for HA under GNU? Debian already has s
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:55:49PM +1000, Paul Hampson wrote:
> I just want to clarify this, since the Developer's Reference
> doesn't really specify... Do I have to be a DD to file an ITA?
Nope.
cu andreas
I just want to clarify this, since the Developer's Reference
doesn't really specify... Do I have to be a DD to file an ITA?
(This is currently academic since the packages I was looking
at have all been ITA'd already, but this way I'll know for
future reference.)
--
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
