Package: colordiff
Version: 1.0.2-1
Homepage: http://colordiff.sf.net/
Deb: http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/unstable/
NM-Status: waiting on DAM
Description: tool to colorize 'diff' output
ColorDiff is a wrapper for for the 'diff' command. It produces
the same output as diff, but with colored hig
Hi all,
I have collected some nice skins for xmms-kjofol from various webpages
around. I plan to include these skins into xmms-kjofol.
Unfortunately, most of these zip-files doesn't include any copyright
information. For this reason I have written to the authors and ask to
publish the skins unde
--
^D
Connection closed.
Hello Keegan,
> Hello! This post would be much more on-topic on the Debian mentors mailing
> list. I'm Cc'ing this reply there, and you should really subscribe there if
> you are interested in completing these packages.
ok I did
> You should wait at least a couple of weeks, but it does sound
(I got the list address wrong the first time. This was actually sent back to
Cristiano.)
On Sunday 04 May 2003 05:34 pm, Cristiano De Michele wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm Cristiano De Michele and very recently I got involved
> in OpenMosix(OM: http://www.openmosix.org)
> project (Sourceforge ID=demichel).
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 10:48:35PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You can use the pbuilder package to set yourself up an unstable chroot,
> > or, if you want to roll your own, see:
> >
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-tips.en.html#
Hi,
Jaime Robles wrote:
> I am having some problems when packaging an application (KDE app):
> ==
> E: klog: symlink-should-be-relative usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/klog/common
> /usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/common
> E: klog: package-has-a-duplicate-relation xlibs (>> 4.1.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 05 May 2003 16:13, Jaime Robles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am having some problems when packaging an application (KDE app):
> ==
> E: klog: symlink-should-be-relative
> usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/klog
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 02:22:37PM +0100, Mark Howard wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 09:29, Sven Luther wrote:
> > You can get the mail adress of the autobuild maintainers from :
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/people
>
> Sorry if this seems dumb, but I can't find them on there. Which entries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
I am having some problems when packaging an application (KDE app):
==
E: klog: symlink-should-be-relative usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/klog/common
/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/common
E: klog: package-has-a-duplicate-rela
Hi, Craig.
> "Craig" == Craig P Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Craig> Greetings, I'm an avid Linux user and programmer, and I'd
Craig> like to become a Debian Developer. As the first step in
Craig> this process, I'd like to take the calc source package and
Craig> maintai
On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 09:29, Sven Luther wrote:
> You can get the mail adress of the autobuild maintainers from :
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/people
Sorry if this seems dumb, but I can't find them on there. Which entries
do you refer to.
> Notice that nor non-free nor contrib gets autobuild,
On Mon, 05 May 2003 10:49:07 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> libgnome0-java is "Architecture: all" and as this it is handled as
> architecture independent. All architectures use the same package.
The -jni packages as part of the java-gnome source package are
Architecture: any.
--
.''`. Mark How
On Sat, May 03, 2003 at 04:59:57PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 03:05:05PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
So, as long as upstream hasn't agreed to change this (or even stated
they never will), what should I do? In the speci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 5. Mai 2003 10:07 schrieb Mark Howard:
> Hi,
> When first packaged, java-gnome went into contrib (it depended on
> non-free JVM and ant). I've now replaced this with free tools and
> moved the package to main. The first upload for main was
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 09:07:38AM +0100, Mark Howard wrote:
> Hi,
> When first packaged, java-gnome went into contrib (it depended on
> non-free JVM and ant). I've now replaced this with free tools and moved
> the package to main. The first upload for main was on 5th April (it was
> accepted) th
Hi,
When first packaged, java-gnome went into contrib (it depended on
non-free JVM and ant). I've now replaced this with free tools and moved
the package to main. The first upload for main was on 5th April (it was
accepted) there have been two others since then.
Automatic builds have not been at
David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 03:05:05PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
>> > So, as long as upstream hasn't agreed to change this (or even stated
>> > they never will), what should I do? In the special case where I came
>> > across this, it's even worse: The deve
Andrew Stribblehill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> IMO a release should have a bare version number. What I did is this:
>
> cfengine2-2.0.5-1
> cfengine2-2.0.5+2.0.6-pre1
> ...
> cfengine2-2.0.6-1
>
> Then all ugliness is confined for when you're doing ugly things :)
That looks ugly^W err, nice.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
I'm an avid Linux user and programmer, and I'd like to become a Debian
Developer. As the first step in this process, I'd like to adopt the
orphaned "calc" source package and maintain it via a sponsor.
I have downloaded it, updated the i
20 matches
Mail list logo
