Hi,
I'm tring to be a Debian Developer. I made a program to make a mirror
from Debian Distributions server called ddmirror
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/ddmirror) and follow the guide lines
from Debian Policy, Developers' Reference and Debian New Maintainers'
Guide to make a deb package.
If som
On Sun, 13 Apr 2003, Fielder George Dowding wrote:
> Greetings. I am interested in becoming a member of the Debian
> Distribution by adopting the Defoma package as the maintainer.
>
> I have spent several days reading the documents on
> www.debian.org/devel/ as well as /join/ but it appears to me
On Sun, 13 Apr 2003, nil wrote:
> >From an outsider's point of view Debian looks like the most
> irresponsible distro with no contact whatsoever with original
> package authors.
Ahem, please don't label the entire Debian project on the basis of the
actions of one person who (AFAICT) isn't even a
I demand that nil may or may not have written...
> What the hell?
> It's taken this long to contact the actual maintainer of playmidi (me)?
(Taken to private mail.)
--
| Darren Salt | linux (or ds) at | nr. Ashington,
| woody, sarge, | youmustbejoking | Northumberland
| RISC OS | demo
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 07:23:45PM -0700, nil wrote:
> What the hell?
>
> It's taken this long to contact the actual maintainer of
> playmidi (me)?
>
> I have no interest in debian, but I am still actively
> developing playmidi.
>
> Perhaps people should consider actually MAILING THE MAINTAINER
What the hell?
It's taken this long to contact the actual maintainer of
playmidi (me)?
I have no interest in debian, but I am still actively
developing playmidi.
Perhaps people should consider actually MAILING THE MAINTAINER
when they make patches so that I (or other maintainers of other
project
To Whom it May Concern;
Greetings. I am interested in becoming a member of the Debian
Distribution by adopting the Defoma package as the maintainer.
I have spent several days reading the documents on
www.debian.org/devel/ as well as /join/ but it appears to me to be a
"Catch 22" condition. Theref
I demand that Brian Nelson may or may not have written...
> Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm looking for a sponsor for playmidi.
>> I've fixed some of the reported bugs and applied an extra patch or two of
>> my own. The diff and dsc files aren't available for download but I'll send
Jarno Elonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> unless they can give some demonstration that they're into more than just
>> making packages. Fixing bugs, for instance.
>
> This advice is quite usual on this list. I think there are a few reasons why
> it's not as common thing for non-DDs to do as it
Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for playmidi.
>
> I've fixed some of the reported bugs and applied an extra patch or two of my
> own. The diff and dsc files aren't available for download but I'll send them
> to anybody who's interested in sponsorship.
Are you p
I'm looking for a sponsor for playmidi.
I've fixed some of the reported bugs and applied an extra patch or two of my
own. The diff and dsc files aren't available for download but I'll send them
to anybody who's interested in sponsorship.
I've also considered splitting the package (ref. bug 28471)
I'm looking for a sponsor for the PyOpenGL 2.0.0 packages I created to
replace the current python-opengl (1.5) packages. The new packages have seen
some use, and have produced positive feedback :) I've used them myself
without problems, and haven't had any complaints other than "why aren't they
in
> > (Hint for the unaware: #166130, #166897, #167054. The fact that
> > pkgreport.cgi doesn't display them is a bug in debbugs, not
> > bugs.qa.debian.org.)
>
> So bugs.qa.debian.org has a different notion of what constitutes an RC
> bug in a package to everything else
My guess is that pkgreport j
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 03:19:03PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 02:25:43AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > (Hint for the unaware: #166130, #166897, #167054. The fact that
> > pkgreport.cgi doesn't display them is a bug in debbugs, not
> > bugs.qa.debian.org.)
>
> So bugs.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 02:25:43AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 01:02:05AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 03:44:54PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Have you tried http://bugs.qa.debian.org/?
> >
> > http://bugs.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/standard.cgi
* Jarno Elonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030412 11:41]:
> + The bug tracking system is a less clear and more difficult to use
>than in many other open projects.
>
>I, for instance, find it a lot easier to work with KDE's or even
>OOo's bug trackers than Debian's. Being email based (an thus
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 12:21:49PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-13 02:25]:
> > The fact that pkgreport.cgi doesn't display them is a bug in
> > debbugs, not
>
> Well, then we can still blame you. :-P
You'll note that bugreport.cgi has improved recen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roger!
Am Dienstag, 8. April 2003 00:46 schrieb Roger Ward:
> Please don't think I am suggesting your build process should involve three
> source tarballs (i'm not the expert in Debian Ways To Do Things), but take
> a look at Apache and how it is b
> Sounds like something a prospective DD might like to have a go at.
> Especially someone who has plans to perhaps hack dpkg, apt, or something
> like that. Groping through the packages DB is the main part, counting
> outstanding bugs should be pretty simple. Anyone want to give it a whirl?
I th
19 matches
Mail list logo
