This one time, at band camp, Dan Christensen said:
> James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Sorry but I can't really understand, writing a debian/shlibs.local
> > > file overriding libc6 version is possible and supposed to work. Is
> > > it w
This one time, at band camp, Dan Christensen said:
> James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Sorry but I can't really understand, writing a debian/shlibs.local
> > > file overriding libc6 version is possible and supposed to work. Is
> > > it w
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:09:22 -0500,
Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > Import the Debian keyring, download the .changes of your package,
> > and verify the signature.
> You mean whole keyring of Debian? How many megs it is? Where
> should I download it, what's my login
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:09:22 -0500,
Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > Import the Debian keyring, download the .changes of your package,
> > and verify the signature.
> You mean whole keyring of Debian? How many megs it is? Where
> should I download it, what's my login
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Sorry but I can't really understand, writing a debian/shlibs.local file
>> overriding libc6 version is possible and supposed to work. Is it wrong or bad
>> pratice? I know it isn't the Right Way, I'm only
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Sorry but I can't really understand, writing a debian/shlibs.local file
>> overriding libc6 version is possible and supposed to work. Is it wrong or bad
>> pratice? I know it isn't the Right Way, I'm only
Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 02:38:47PM +, James Troup wrote:
> > Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > i got my autossh package sponsored by martin f krafft (thanks!), now
> > > Dan Christensen pointed me out [1] that autossh works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 08:55:36AM -0800, deFreese, Barry wrote:
> Is anyone out there looking for a fairly newbie to Linux and a total
> greenhorn to C to do some grunt work? Bug fixes, documentation, small
> coding??
Yup, we need a lot of man pages[
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:18:17PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> > #4: I know I had a fourth question, but since I can't for my life
> > remember what it was... Well. Let's not dwell on it, shall we.
>
> OK ;-)
>
> I'd suggest "gimp1.2-foob
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 02:38:47PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > i got my autossh package sponsored by martin f krafft (thanks!), now
> > Dan Christensen pointed me out [1] that autossh works fine also in
> > testing and I've tried it too. Should I
Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> Import the Debian keyring, download the .changes of your package,
> and verify the signature.
You mean whole keyring of Debian? How many megs it is? Where
should I download it, what's my login etc.? BTW, I have UPLOADED
my signed public key to keys.debian.org -- isn't it enou
OK, so now that we've established that there are people on this list. :-)
Is anyone out there looking for a fairly newbie to Linux and a total
greenhorn to C to do some grunt work? Bug fixes, documentation, small
coding?? I have been wanting to delve into C for a long time and have just
start
Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 02:38:47PM +, James Troup wrote:
> > Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > i got my autossh package sponsored by martin f krafft (thanks!), now
> > > Dan Christensen pointed me out [1] that autossh works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 08:55:36AM -0800, deFreese, Barry wrote:
> Is anyone out there looking for a fairly newbie to Linux and a total
> greenhorn to C to do some grunt work? Bug fixes, documentation, small
> coding??
Yup, we need a lot of man pages[
Hi, my name is Thomas Wouters and I'm looking for a mentor. :)
The PyOpenGL debian package, python-opengl, is heavily outdated, being
version 1.5.7 whereas the upstream stable version is 2.0.0.44 by now. It
also has some other issues, like being built against the wrong version of
Tk. PyOpenGL 2.0
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:18:17PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> > #4: I know I had a fourth question, but since I can't for my life
> > remember what it was... Well. Let's not dwell on it, shall we.
>
> OK ;-)
>
> I'd suggest "gimp1.2-foob
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 02:38:47PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > i got my autossh package sponsored by martin f krafft (thanks!), now
> > Dan Christensen pointed me out [1] that autossh works fine also in
> > testing and I've tried it too. Should I
Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> Import the Debian keyring, download the .changes of your package,
> and verify the signature.
You mean whole keyring of Debian? How many megs it is? Where
should I download it, what's my login etc.? BTW, I have UPLOADED
my signed public key to keys.debian.org -- isn't it enou
OK, so now that we've established that there are people on this list. :-)
Is anyone out there looking for a fairly newbie to Linux and a total
greenhorn to C to do some grunt work? Bug fixes, documentation, small
coding?? I have been wanting to delve into C for a long time and have just
start
Hi, my name is Thomas Wouters and I'm looking for a mentor. :)
The PyOpenGL debian package, python-opengl, is heavily outdated, being
version 1.5.7 whereas the upstream stable version is 2.0.0.44 by now. It
also has some other issues, like being built against the wrong version of
Tk. PyOpenGL 2.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 23 Jan 2003 13:26, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> hi mentors!
> i got my autossh package sponsored by martin f krafft (thanks!), now
> Dan Christensen pointed me out [1] that autossh works fine also in testing
> and I've tried it too. Should I
Hi!
I have packaged airfart, a wireless lan sniffer, with a GTK+ interface
(and text based too). The package is lintian clean.
You can get it from:
deb http://ranty.ddts.net/~ghe_rivero/debian ./
Since this is my first package submission ever, I don't know much about
the sponsor process,
Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i got my autossh package sponsored by martin f krafft (thanks!), now
> Dan Christensen pointed me out [1] that autossh works fine also in
> testing and I've tried it too. Should I force libc6 >= 2.2.5 and let
> autossh hit testing? there is any good
hi mentors!
i got my autossh package sponsored by martin f krafft (thanks!), now
Dan Christensen pointed me out [1] that autossh works fine also in testing and
I've tried it too. Should I force libc6 >= 2.2.5 and let autossh hit testing?
there is any good reason against this pratice for packages bu
Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i got my autossh package sponsored by martin f krafft (thanks!), now
> Dan Christensen pointed me out [1] that autossh works fine also in
> testing and I've tried it too. Should I force libc6 >= 2.2.5 and let
> autossh hit testing? there is any good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 23 Jan 2003 13:26, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> hi mentors!
> i got my autossh package sponsored by martin f krafft (thanks!), now
> Dan Christensen pointed me out [1] that autossh works fine also in testing
> and I've tried it too. Should I
Hi!
I have packaged airfart, a wireless lan sniffer, with a GTK+ interface
(and text based too). The package is lintian clean.
You can get it from:
deb http://ranty.ddts.net/~ghe_rivero/debian ./
Since this is my first package submission ever, I don't know much about
the sponsor process,
hi mentors!
i got my autossh package sponsored by martin f krafft (thanks!), now
Dan Christensen pointed me out [1] that autossh works fine also in testing and
I've tried it too. Should I force libc6 >= 2.2.5 and let autossh hit testing?
there is any good reason against this pratice for packages bu
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 12:04:10AM -0500, jereme wrote:
> I am interesting in adopting a package up for adoption,
> (faqomatic, RFA: 164959). I contacted the maintainer, had a
> brief chat and retitled the bug to an ITA as instructed.
>
> I noticed their was a new bug repo
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 03:04, Breno wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> I'm interested in maintaining the orphaned package prozgui. It was
> previously maintained by Kov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and, following his
> advice, I belive I need a 'sponsor' before starting my work.
You don't need a sponsor to start r
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 12:04:10AM -0500, jereme wrote:
> I am interesting in adopting a package up for adoption,
> (faqomatic, RFA: 164959). I contacted the maintainer, had a
> brief chat and retitled the bug to an ITA as instructed.
>
> I noticed their was a new bug repo
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 03:04, Breno wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> I'm interested in maintaining the orphaned package prozgui. It was
> previously maintained by Kov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and, following his
> advice, I belive I need a 'sponsor' before starting my work.
You don't need a sponsor to start r
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 18:01:28 -0500,
Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> somebody here on the list was so kind, that he volunteered to
> be a sponsor for my package vimoutliner.
[snip]
> Unfortunately, I have by mistake deleted couple of my mails
> (including this one) and I do not know, who was
33 matches
Mail list logo