On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 03:42:00PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
> * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021217 08:47]:
> > What information are you trying to store in LDAP that is so essential to
> > the system prior to mounting of /usr?
> > [...]
> Using LDAP information as a replacement for almos
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021217 08:47]:
> What information are you trying to store in LDAP that is so essential to
> the system prior to mounting of /usr?
> [...]
Using LDAP information as a replacement for almost all of /etc/password.
--
-- Grant Bowman
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:43:27AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> What information are you trying to store in LDAP that is so essential to
> the system prior to mounting of /usr?
>
> It is entirely valid for /usr to be located on a network share (NFS), so
> you're not really guaranteed to be able
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 03:42:00PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
> * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021217 08:47]:
> > What information are you trying to store in LDAP that is so essential to
> > the system prior to mounting of /usr?
> > [...]
> Using LDAP information as a replacement for almos
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021217 08:47]:
> What information are you trying to store in LDAP that is so essential to
> the system prior to mounting of /usr?
> [...]
Using LDAP information as a replacement for almost all of /etc/password.
--
-- Grant Bowman
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:43:27AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> What information are you trying to store in LDAP that is so essential to
> the system prior to mounting of /usr?
>
> It is entirely valid for /usr to be located on a network share (NFS), so
> you're not really guaranteed to be able
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:29:44AM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
> After reading the content of this bug, I'm curious which rules would be
> broken by moving the necessary libraries to /lib from /usr/lib. I can
> understand why you have moved this bug to "won't fix" but without some
> kind of soluti
Hello Sami,
After reading the content of this bug, I'm curious which rules would be
broken by moving the necessary libraries to /lib from /usr/lib. I can
understand why you have moved this bug to "won't fix" but without some
kind of solution users who use NSS special lookups like LDAP will always
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:36:07PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> chown netsaint debian/netsaint-neat/usr/lib/cgi-bin/netsaint/neat.cgi
> chown: `netsaint': invalid user
>
>
>
> I have seen several packages which do this and fail,
> and what is the proper way to fix that ?
This sort of thing i
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:29:44AM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
> After reading the content of this bug, I'm curious which rules would be
> broken by moving the necessary libraries to /lib from /usr/lib. I can
> understand why you have moved this bug to "won't fix" but without some
> kind of soluti
Hello Sami,
After reading the content of this bug, I'm curious which rules would be
broken by moving the necessary libraries to /lib from /usr/lib. I can
understand why you have moved this bug to "won't fix" but without some
kind of solution users who use NSS special lookups like LDAP will always
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:36:07PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> chown netsaint debian/netsaint-neat/usr/lib/cgi-bin/netsaint/neat.cgi
> chown: `netsaint': invalid user
>
>
>
> I have seen several packages which do this and fail,
> and what is the proper way to fix that ?
This sort of thing i
Il mar, 2002-12-17 alle 14:13, Filippo Giunchedi ha scritto:
> hi!,
> i've packaged moleskine plus gtk bindings for scintilla edit component and
> python bindings for gtkscintilla.
i filed an itp on this stuff in the past, before lossing interest in
scintilla. i can take care of checking and uploa
hi!,
i've packaged moleskine plus gtk bindings for scintilla edit component and
python bindings for gtkscintilla.
All packages are available on http://debian.esaurito.net and apt-gettable with
deb http://debian.esaurito.net ./
Name: moleskine
Url: http://www.micampe.it/software/moleskine/
Version:
Hi Andrea!
You wrote:
> I would prefer to get my e-mail from master.debian.org
> using fetchmail (instead of having a forward in the db db.debian.org)
> how can I do it?
I don't think it is possible atm. Master runs no pop and no imap
servers.
--
Kind regards,
+
Il mar, 2002-12-17 alle 14:13, Filippo Giunchedi ha scritto:
> hi!,
> i've packaged moleskine plus gtk bindings for scintilla edit component and
> python bindings for gtkscintilla.
i filed an itp on this stuff in the past, before lossing interest in
scintilla. i can take care of checking and uploa
hi
I would prefer to get my e-mail from master.debian.org
using fetchmail (instead of having a forward in the db db.debian.org)
how can I do it?
thanks
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
"E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa!" (Tonino Carotone)
pgpLV6XV5fLNP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hi!,
i've packaged moleskine plus gtk bindings for scintilla edit component and
python bindings for gtkscintilla.
All packages are available on http://debian.esaurito.net and apt-gettable with
deb http://debian.esaurito.net ./
Name: moleskine
Url: http://www.micampe.it/software/moleskine/
Version:
Hi Andrea!
You wrote:
> I would prefer to get my e-mail from master.debian.org
> using fetchmail (instead of having a forward in the db db.debian.org)
> how can I do it?
I don't think it is possible atm. Master runs no pop and no imap
servers.
--
Kind regards,
+
hi
I would prefer to get my e-mail from master.debian.org
using fetchmail (instead of having a forward in the db db.debian.org)
how can I do it?
thanks
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
"E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa!" (Tonino Carotone)
msg08113/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:36:07PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> chown netsaint debian/netsaint-neat/usr/lib/cgi-bin/netsaint/neat.cgi
> chown: `netsaint': invalid user
> I have seen several packages which do this and fail,
> and what is the proper way to fix that ?
postinst?
Yours sincerely,
A
Hi,
I have a question.
There are packages which probably need to be changed the owner (or suid)
in .deb packages.
Trying to chown to a user which does not exist will obviously emit an error
like this:
dh_link
dh_strip
dh_compress
dh_fixperms
chown netsaint debian/netsaint-neat/usr/lib/cgi-bin/
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:36:07PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> chown netsaint debian/netsaint-neat/usr/lib/cgi-bin/netsaint/neat.cgi
> chown: `netsaint': invalid user
> I have seen several packages which do this and fail,
> and what is the proper way to fix that ?
postinst?
Yours sincerely,
A
23 matches
Mail list logo
