What's wrong with linking with OpenSSL?
Colin Walters wrote:
Incidentally (and this is more a question for upstream, but maybe you
know), how hard would it be to make this library work with GNUTLS? See,
I might want to use it with a GPL'd application, and of course since
libxmlsec links with Op
On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 21:01, John Belmonte wrote:
> Thanks, I appreciate it.
I didn't find any problems in your packages; they look good.
> OK, I've sent an email off to the maintainer.
I think a week or so should be fair.
> That's understandable. About three weeks ago I tried to contact the
On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 21:33, Indra Kusuma wrote:
> On 7 Aug 2002, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> # I much prefer to sponsor people who have at least had their key signed
> # by a developer. Have you seen the keysigning coordination page?
> #
> # http://nm.debian.org/gpg_offer.php
>
> what about my cou
> "Alexis" == Alexis Rimbaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hi Alexis. Don't you think it is better to split the themes
>> in another package?
Alexis> Yes, I think it would be better. What do you think of
Alexis> building one package per theme or do you prefer one
Alexis
On 7 Aug 2002, Colin Walters wrote:
# I much prefer to sponsor people who have at least had their key signed
# by a developer. Have you seen the keysigning coordination page?
#
# http://nm.debian.org/gpg_offer.php
what about my country .ID ?
is it okey if im just send driving license and sign it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Colin Walters wrote:
|
| I am looking over your packages now.
Thanks, I appreciate it.
|>The required version of libxslt1 wasn't available (bug #154730), so I've
|>also prepared a libxslt NMU.
|
| Hm, the last maintainer upload was almost a year ago
On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 12:07, John Belmonte wrote:
> I've packaged libxmlsec (bug #152605), a library for performing
> signature and encryption operations on XML [...]
Cool.
> and am looking for a sponsor.
I am looking over your packages now.
> The required version of libxslt1 wasn't available
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 06:59:23PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> is no excuse for packaging this seperately IMNSHO.
>
> Furthermore, libncurses5 is Priority: required, so I don't really buy
> your argument about cutting down dependencies either.
>
> Why don't you contact the sysutils maintainer
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 06:22:26PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > Is memtester the same as memtest? If yes, why did you package it at
> > alle? If no, why the conflicts?
>
> The package name ist memtester, the executables name is memtest. It is indeed
> the same memtest that is in sysutils.
> You
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 06:06:58PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Aug 2002, Oliver Kurth wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 11:00:21AM -0400, Adam Lazur wrote:
> > > Oliver Kurth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > > I have packaged memtester 2.93.1.
> > >
> > > memtest 2.93.1 is alread
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I've packaged libxmlsec (bug #152605), a library for performing
signature and encryption operations on XML, and am looking for a sponsor.
~http://memebeam.org/john/tests/libxmlsec/
The required version of libxslt1 wasn't available (bug #
On Wed, 07 Aug 2002, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 11:00:21AM -0400, Adam Lazur wrote:
> > Oliver Kurth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > I have packaged memtester 2.93.1.
> >
> > memtest 2.93.1 is already available in Debian as a part of the sysutils
> > package.
>
> I know. See m
I've almost finished creating a package for htmlpp a html preprocessor
which has lots of example files.
There's a makefile target 'install-docs' which I've modified to install
things into /usr/share/docs/htmlpp/.
Is this sufficient - or should I setup a link from /usr/doc as well?
Steve
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 11:00:21AM -0400, Adam Lazur wrote:
> Oliver Kurth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > I have packaged memtester 2.93.1.
>
> memtest 2.93.1 is already available in Debian as a part of the sysutils
> package.
I know. See my ITP, I already discussed this with the author of sysutil
Oliver Kurth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> I have packaged memtester 2.93.1.
memtest 2.93.1 is already available in Debian as a part of the sysutils
package.
--
Adam Lazur, Cluster Monkey
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 02:15:56PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have packaged memtester 2.93.1. It is available with the following sources
> lines:
>
> deb http://masqmail.cx/debian
> deb-src http://masqmail.cx/debian
Sorry, I meant:
deb http://masqmail.cx/debian woody main
deb-src
Hello!
I have packaged memtester 2.93.1. It is available with the following sources
lines:
deb http://masqmail.cx/debian
deb-src http://masqmail.cx/debian
I start with version -2, because I have -1 already there for a while, and
I made a few minor changes.
I already filed an ITP for it (#155035
On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
# I'll sponsor this for you if you like - I'm beginning to get IPv6 going
# at home so I can at least test it. Send me private mail with a pointer
# to the source package.
thank you colin.
# > Description: This is a little WWW-proxy that can communicate ov
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 04:26:08PM +0700, Indra Kusuma wrote:
> I already applied as new maintainer[0] with [EMAIL PROTECTED] as my
> advocate, but looks like brian is idle so theres no response from him.
>
> I also have made 2 IPv6 patch package[1], and now i just finished build
> new package cal
Dear *,
I already applied as new maintainer[0] with [EMAIL PROTECTED] as my
advocate, but looks like brian is idle so theres no response from him.
I also have made 2 IPv6 patch package[1], and now i just finished build
new package called www6to4, i need a sponsor to this www6to4 package and
an a
20 matches
Mail list logo
