On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:07:47AM +, David H. Askew wrote:
> so there will be
>
> jedit
> jedit-doc or jedit-doc-html (which is prefered)?
jedit-doc
> The docs are distributed in the same src package as the program, so if I
> make two packages, one for the docs and one for the binary.. won'
On 03-Apr-2002 David H. Askew wrote:
>
> Ok.. so i'm working on packages for jedit .. and I'm contemplating
> splitting the documentation into its own sepperate package.
>
> so there will be
>
> jedit
> jedit-doc or jedit-doc-html (which is prefered)?
>
generally you specify html if there i
Ok.. so i'm working on packages for jedit .. and I'm contemplating
splitting the documentation into its own sepperate package.
so there will be
jedit
jedit-doc or jedit-doc-html (which is prefered)?
background(for non-jedit users) : jedit has a built-in doc-browser which
loads a startup page.
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:07:47AM +, David H. Askew wrote:
> so there will be
>
> jedit
> jedit-doc or jedit-doc-html (which is prefered)?
jedit-doc
> The docs are distributed in the same src package as the program, so if I
> make two packages, one for the docs and one for the binary.. won
On 03-Apr-2002 David H. Askew wrote:
>
> Ok.. so i'm working on packages for jedit .. and I'm contemplating
> splitting the documentation into its own sepperate package.
>
> so there will be
>
> jedit
> jedit-doc or jedit-doc-html (which is prefered)?
>
generally you specify html if there
Ok.. so i'm working on packages for jedit .. and I'm contemplating
splitting the documentation into its own sepperate package.
so there will be
jedit
jedit-doc or jedit-doc-html (which is prefered)?
background(for non-jedit users) : jedit has a built-in doc-browser which
loads a startup page
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:39:33PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:08:49AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > The upstream of zblast released 1.2 after he released 1.2pre.
> > The problem is that dpkg thinks 1.2 is older than 1.2pre.
> > So I asked him what I should do. He pic
Hi everyone.
As I am using with high for months satisfation Debiain I would like to give my
little contribute.
My question is relativly simple: can I make a .deb file of a program I found
useful or only "oprphaned" are for new maintainers?
I already have read "Debian New Maintainers' Guide" but
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:39:33PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:08:49AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > The upstream of zblast released 1.2 after he released 1.2pre.
> > The problem is that dpkg thinks 1.2 is older than 1.2pre.
> > So I asked him what I should do. He pi
Hi everyone.
As I am using with high for months satisfation Debiain I would like to give my little
contribute.
My question is relativly simple: can I make a .deb file of a program I found useful or
only "oprphaned" are for new maintainers?
I already have read "Debian New Maintainers' Guide" bu
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:39:33PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:08:49AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > The upstream of zblast released 1.2 after he released 1.2pre.
> > The problem is that dpkg thinks 1.2 is older than 1.2pre.
> > So I asked him what I should do. He pic
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:08:49AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> The upstream of zblast released 1.2 after he released 1.2pre.
> The problem is that dpkg thinks 1.2 is older than 1.2pre.
> So I asked him what I should do. He picked 1.2.1 for
> the Debian package, saying "I very rarely use x.y.z
> v
> The upstream of zblast released 1.2 after he released 1.2pre.
> The problem is that dpkg thinks 1.2 is older than 1.2pre.
> So I asked him what I should do. He picked 1.2.1 for
> the Debian package, saying "I very rarely use x.y.z
> versions, and I've never used them for zblast."
>
> Did I do s
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:08:49AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> The upstream of zblast released 1.2 after he released 1.2pre.
> The problem is that dpkg thinks 1.2 is older than 1.2pre.
> So I asked him what I should do. He picked 1.2.1 for
> the Debian package, saying "I very rarely use x.y.z
> v
The upstream of zblast released 1.2 after he released 1.2pre.
The problem is that dpkg thinks 1.2 is older than 1.2pre.
So I asked him what I should do. He picked 1.2.1 for
the Debian package, saying "I very rarely use x.y.z
versions, and I've never used them for zblast."
Did I do something wrong
Hi!
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 05:10:24PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> if he compiled with debhelper from potato there is a good chance he would be
> lying about his standards version. The standards-version should match the
> standards you were compiled against.
OK! That's right. I forgot t
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:39:33PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:08:49AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > The upstream of zblast released 1.2 after he released 1.2pre.
> > The problem is that dpkg thinks 1.2 is older than 1.2pre.
> > So I asked him what I should do. He pi
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:08:49AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> The upstream of zblast released 1.2 after he released 1.2pre.
> The problem is that dpkg thinks 1.2 is older than 1.2pre.
> So I asked him what I should do. He picked 1.2.1 for
> the Debian package, saying "I very rarely use x.y.z
>
> The upstream of zblast released 1.2 after he released 1.2pre.
> The problem is that dpkg thinks 1.2 is older than 1.2pre.
> So I asked him what I should do. He picked 1.2.1 for
> the Debian package, saying "I very rarely use x.y.z
> versions, and I've never used them for zblast."
>
> Did I do
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:08:49AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> The upstream of zblast released 1.2 after he released 1.2pre.
> The problem is that dpkg thinks 1.2 is older than 1.2pre.
> So I asked him what I should do. He picked 1.2.1 for
> the Debian package, saying "I very rarely use x.y.z
>
The upstream of zblast released 1.2 after he released 1.2pre.
The problem is that dpkg thinks 1.2 is older than 1.2pre.
So I asked him what I should do. He picked 1.2.1 for
the Debian package, saying "I very rarely use x.y.z
versions, and I've never used them for zblast."
Did I do something wron
Hi!
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 05:10:24PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> if he compiled with debhelper from potato there is a good chance he would be
> lying about his standards version. The standards-version should match the
> standards you were compiled against.
OK! That's right. I forgot
Me:
> Did I misunderstand something, or is the keyring server down?
D'uh! GnuPG doesn't like my proxy. If I disable the proxy, it works just
fine.
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter
Hi!
According to the docs I an update my key on the Debian keyring by giving the
command
gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --send-keys 0x6394265E
but I cannot get it to work. Everytime I try (from different machines) I get
the error message
gpg: error sending to `keyring.debian.org': eof
Me:
> Did I misunderstand something, or is the keyring server down?
D'uh! GnuPG doesn't like my proxy. If I disable the proxy, it works just
fine.
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
http://www.softwolves.pp.se/pete
Hi!
According to the docs I an update my key on the Debian keyring by giving the
command
gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --send-keys 0x6394265E
but I cannot get it to work. Everytime I try (from different machines) I get
the error message
gpg: error sending to `keyring.debian.org': eof
* Matthew Twomey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Must all packages be maintained primarily in i386 format? I have a SPARC
> platform and was considering the idea of contributing to Debian through
> package management. Would I need to set up an i386 based system in
> addition to my Debian SPARC?
>
no
27 matches
Mail list logo
