On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:08:49AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> The upstream of zblast released 1.2 after he released 1.2pre.
> The problem is that dpkg thinks 1.2 is older than 1.2pre.
> So I asked him what I should do. He picked 1.2.1 for
> the Debian package, saying "I very rarely use x.y.z
> versions, and I've never used them for zblast."
I guess whatever works if upstream agrees. And I see it is clear from the
changelog.
> Did I do something wrong here? I don't think an epoch
> is for such a case.
Too late now, but in future, put the digit "0" in front of the pre to make
it possible to supercede it with a higher version#. If you had started with
1.2.0pre-1, you could have rescued the version# here by numbering the final
1.2final or some such.
Ben
--
nSLUG http://www.nslug.ns.ca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ pgp key fingerprint = 7F DA 09 4B BA 2C 0D E0 1B B1 31 ED C6 A9 39 4F ]
[ gpg key fingerprint = 395C F3A4 35D3 D247 1387 2D9E 5A94 F3CA 0B27 13C8 ]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
