Hello,
We have received your request to join the RealEstateInTheUSA group
at Yahoo! Groups, home to free, easy-to-use email groups. To become a
member of the RealEstateInTheUSA group, please confirm your
request by replying to this message.
If you did not request, or do not want, a membership i
Hello,
We have received your request to join the RealEstateInTheUSA group
at Yahoo! Groups, home to free, easy-to-use email groups. To become a
member of the RealEstateInTheUSA group, please confirm your
request by replying to this message.
If you did not request, or do not want, a membership
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 07:01:09PM +0100, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
> > Aha, I didn't realize there was that kind of black magic in ld.so
> > (documented in ldconfig). Well, then I'd venture that ld.so is
> > imperfect. If it knows to ignore certain
Title: â§â¡â
"íë¼ìëì¬" ê°ë¼ì¬ë...
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 07:01:09PM +0100, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
> > Aha, I didn't realize there was that kind of black magic in ld.so
> > (documented in ldconfig). Well, then I'd venture that ld.so is
> > imperfect. If it knows to ignore certai
Title: ¢¿¢½¡Ú "Çöó¿öµµ»ç" °¡¶ó»ç´ë...
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 11:58:55AM +0700, Bambang Purnomosidi D. P. wrote:
> I am working with a package. From the author, it should be installed its
> lib to /usr/libexec.
>
> I already read FHS and this seems not conformant. I also looked at other
> deb package, and they seems to install into /u
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 07:01:09PM +0100, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
> David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, it should. In this case, imagine GNU libc 3 comes out, Debian
> > decides to migrate to it, and libraries linked against glibc 2 are
> > moved to /usr/i386-glibc2-linux/lib or
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 11:58:55AM +0700, Bambang Purnomosidi D. P. wrote:
> I am working with a package. From the author, it should be installed its
> lib to /usr/libexec.
>
> I already read FHS and this seems not conformant. I also looked at other
> deb package, and they seems to install into /
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 07:01:09PM +0100, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
> David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, it should. In this case, imagine GNU libc 3 comes out, Debian
> > decides to migrate to it, and libraries linked against glibc 2 are
> > moved to /usr/i386-glibc2-linux/lib or
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 05:44:34PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 09:28:33AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Modifying a conffile in user scripts is a violation of
> > policy.
>
> Nevertheless, I remember seeing a couple of packages that changed their
> config files a
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 09:28:33AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> > An upgrade of the htdig can fail now (bug #133867), because this
> >> > location should be changed in the configuration file too. Can I
> >> > modify the location (if it's still listed as the old location) in the
> >> > co
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 05:44:34PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 09:28:33AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Modifying a conffile in user scripts is a violation of
> > policy.
>
> Nevertheless, I remember seeing a couple of packages that changed their
> config files
>>"Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Josip> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:25:36PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> > An upgrade of the htdig can fail now (bug #133867), because this
>> > location should be changed in the configuration file too. Can I
>> > modify the location (if i
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> what is the correct procedure to get a new GPG key into the Debian
> keyring? My old one expired unnoticed by me :(.
So what? Change the expiry date and reupload. At least it worked for me.
:-)
Simon
--
GPG public key available from http://ph
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 09:28:33AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> > An upgrade of the htdig can fail now (bug #133867), because this
> >> > location should be changed in the configuration file too. Can I
> >> > modify the location (if it's still listed as the old location) in the
> >> > c
>>"Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Josip> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:25:36PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> > An upgrade of the htdig can fail now (bug #133867), because this
>> > location should be changed in the configuration file too. Can I
>> > modify the location (if
| [Tollef Fog Heen]
| > chrpath isn't packaged yet, but I am sure Petter Reinholdsen
| > wouldn't object.
|
| Petter _Reinholdtsen_ do not object at all.
Sorry, my misspelling. All those ds and ts an everything. I
apologize.
| Note that chrpath isn't able to add an rpath section to an ELF fi
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> what is the correct procedure to get a new GPG key into the Debian
> keyring? My old one expired unnoticed by me :(.
So what? Change the expiry date and reupload. At least it worked for me.
:-)
Simon
--
GPG public key available from http://p
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:25:36PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > The htdig package uses a configuration file, /etc/htdig/htdig.conf,
> > which defines the location of a database file.
> > In a recent version I changed the location of the default path to
> > comply with the debian policy.
> >
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 11:51:25AM +0100, Stijn de Bekker wrote:
> The htdig package uses a configuration file, /etc/htdig/htdig.conf,
> which defines the location of a database file.
> In a recent version I changed the location of the default path to
> comply with the debian policy.
>
> An upgra
Hi,
The htdig package uses a configuration file, /etc/htdig/htdig.conf,
which defines the location of a database file.
In a recent version I changed the location of the default path to
comply with the debian policy.
An upgrade of the htdig can fail now (bug #133867), because this
location shou
| [Tollef Fog Heen]
| > chrpath isn't packaged yet, but I am sure Petter Reinholdsen
| > wouldn't object.
|
| Petter _Reinholdtsen_ do not object at all.
Sorry, my misspelling. All those ds and ts an everything. I
apologize.
| Note that chrpath isn't able to add an rpath section to an ELF f
Hello,
what is the correct procedure to get a new GPG key into the Debian
keyring? My old one expired unnoticed by me :(.
I mailed [EMAIL PROTECTED], but my three mails seem to be dropped
silently.
My key Infos:
Old key ID 959C340F
New key ID 32EC6F3E (signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED])
URL:
http://b
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:25:36PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > The htdig package uses a configuration file, /etc/htdig/htdig.conf,
> > which defines the location of a database file.
> > In a recent version I changed the location of the default path to
> > comply with the debian policy.
> >
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 11:51:25AM +0100, Stijn de Bekker wrote:
> The htdig package uses a configuration file, /etc/htdig/htdig.conf,
> which defines the location of a database file.
> In a recent version I changed the location of the default path to
> comply with the debian policy.
>
> An upgr
Hi,
The htdig package uses a configuration file, /etc/htdig/htdig.conf,
which defines the location of a database file.
In a recent version I changed the location of the default path to
comply with the debian policy.
An upgrade of the htdig can fail now (bug #133867), because this
location sho
Hello,
what is the correct procedure to get a new GPG key into the Debian
keyring? My old one expired unnoticed by me :(.
I mailed [EMAIL PROTECTED], but my three mails seem to be dropped
silently.
My key Infos:
Old key ID 959C340F
New key ID 32EC6F3E (signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED])
URL:
http://
28 matches
Mail list logo
