On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 07:01:09PM +0100, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote: > David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yes, it should. In this case, imagine GNU libc 3 comes out, Debian > > decides to migrate to it, and libraries linked against glibc 2 are > > moved to /usr/i386-glibc2-linux/lib or what not. > > Aha, I didn't realize there was that kind of black magic in ld.so > (documented in ldconfig). Well, then I'd venture that ld.so is > imperfect. If it knows to ignore certain paths in ld.so.conf, it
When does it ignore paths in ld.so.conf? If your binary contains a hard path to /lib/libc.so.6, and then we move that library to /usr/i386-glibc2-linux/lib instead because libc.so.7 is available, your binary will no longer work. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
