Re: /etc/ld.so.preload handling in package maintainer scripts?

2002-02-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 15:11:58 -0600, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:01:24PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: >> That's the intent. Package for internal use only. > >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/snoopylogger/. > >The maintainer script snippits that you provided see

Re: /etc/ld.so.preload handling in package maintainer scripts?

2002-02-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:01:24PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:57:06 -0600, Steve Langasek > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >As you know, preloading a library to ld.so.preload affects all software > >on the system and a bug in the library can lead to dangerous system > >instabil

Re: /etc/ld.so.preload handling in package maintainer scripts?

2002-02-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:57:06 -0600, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >As you know, preloading a library to ld.so.preload affects all software >on the system and a bug in the library can lead to dangerous system >instability. That's the intent. Package for internal use only. http://source

[±¤°í] ³î¶ó¿î ¼ºÀåÈ£¸£¸óÀÇ ºñ¹Ð!!

2002-02-06 Thread ¾ÆǪÁö¸¶
Title: Untitled Document

Re: /etc/ld.so.preload handling in package maintainer scripts?

2002-02-06 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Marc, On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:09:56PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > I am currently preparing a package that needs to establish a > pre-loaded library via /etc/ld.so.preload, and I'd like to discuss > ways to do this in a non-destructive way without breaking the system. > This is what I think o

[±¤°í]À̻翪°æ¸Å Àü¹®»çÀÌÆ®. ¿ì¸®ÁýÀÌ»ç!!

2002-02-06 Thread ¿ì¸®ÁýÀÌ»ç
원치않는 메일을 받으셨다면 정말로 죄송합니다.수신거부를 하신분이 또 받으셨다면 너무 죄송하지만 마지막으로 한번만 다시 수신거부를 해주십시요. 귀하의 메일주소는 웹서핑중, 무작위로 추출한것이며 E-Mail 주소 외에,

Re: ssldump package, key signed, what now?

2002-02-06 Thread Thom May
* nicholas black ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > hi there. i've rolled eric rescorla's ssldump utility (version 0.9b2) > into a deb. after using it for a time in our office, i've decided to > submit it here. > > you may find the deb at > http://gtf.org/~dank/ssldump/ssldump_0.9b2-1_i386.deb > > m

/etc/ld.so.preload handling in package maintainer scripts?

2002-02-06 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, I am currently preparing a package that needs to establish a pre-loaded library via /etc/ld.so.preload, and I'd like to discuss ways to do this in a non-destructive way without breaking the system. This is what I think of: configure: - ask user via debconf if she wants to have the library in

Re: /etc/ld.so.preload handling in package maintainer scripts?

2002-02-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:01:24PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:57:06 -0600, Steve Langasek > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >As you know, preloading a library to ld.so.preload affects all software > >on the system and a bug in the library can lead to dangerous system > >instabi

ssldump package, key signed, what now?

2002-02-06 Thread nicholas black
hi there. i've rolled eric rescorla's ssldump utility (version 0.9b2) into a deb. after using it for a time in our office, i've decided to submit it here. you may find the deb at http://gtf.org/~dank/ssldump/ssldump_0.9b2-1_i386.deb my gpg key is available at finer keystores everywhere (but def

Re: /etc/ld.so.preload handling in package maintainer scripts?

2002-02-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:57:06 -0600, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >As you know, preloading a library to ld.so.preload affects all software >on the system and a bug in the library can lead to dangerous system >instability. That's the intent. Package for internal use only. http://sourc

[±¤°í] ³î¶ó¿î ¼ºÀåÈ£¸£¸óÀÇ ºñ¹Ð!!

2002-02-06 Thread ¾ÆǪÁö¸¶
Title: Untitled Document

Re: Hi!

2002-02-06 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:15:19PM +1000, David Findlay wrote: > I'm new here and want to get into Debian Development after working out an > idea for a new debian program while at the Debian mini-conf at Linux.conf.au. > I'm planning to write an apt method(or similiar) that will allow you to buil

Re: /etc/ld.so.preload handling in package maintainer scripts?

2002-02-06 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Marc, On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:09:56PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > I am currently preparing a package that needs to establish a > pre-loaded library via /etc/ld.so.preload, and I'd like to discuss > ways to do this in a non-destructive way without breaking the system. > This is what I think

[±¤°í]À̻翪°æ¸Å Àü¹®»çÀÌÆ®. ¿ì¸®ÁýÀÌ»ç!!

2002-02-06 Thread ¿ì¸®ÁýÀÌ»ç
¿øÄ¡¾Ê´Â ¸ÞÀÏÀ» ¹ÞÀ¸¼Ì´Ù¸é Á¤¸»·Î Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù.¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ÇϽźÐÀÌ ¶Ç ¹ÞÀ¸¼Ì´Ù¸é ³Ê¹« Á˼ÛÇÏÁö¸¸ ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î Çѹø¸¸ ´Ù½Ã ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ÇØÁֽʽÿä. ±ÍÇÏÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò´Â À¥¼­ÇÎÁß, ¹«ÀÛÀ§·Î ÃßÃâÇÑ°ÍÀ̸ç E-Mail ÁÖ¼Ò ¿Ü¿¡, ´Ù¸¥ Á¤º¸´Â °®°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.Á¤ÅëºÎ ±Ç°í»çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó°í Ç¥±âÇÑ ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ

Re: Adopting package

2002-02-06 Thread Gergely Nagy
> Have I missed something? Are you sure that the Maintainer and the Changed-By field in the .changes file are the same? If they are different, it will count as an NMU from dinstalls point of view. I'd simply bounce the installation-acknowledgement mail to the relevant [EMAIL PROTECTED] address.

Re: ssldump package, key signed, what now?

2002-02-06 Thread Thom May
* nicholas black ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > hi there. i've rolled eric rescorla's ssldump utility (version 0.9b2) > into a deb. after using it for a time in our office, i've decided to > submit it here. > > you may find the deb at > http://gtf.org/~dank/ssldump/ssldump_0.9b2-1_i386.deb > >

Adopting package

2002-02-06 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Hi! I (for the first time) adopted a pacakage (radvd). I uploaded a new version with a changed 'Maintainer:' field, and am now listed as maintainer for that package. However, the bugs I closed in the changelog are 'fixed' not 'closed' and are listed as 'fixed in NMU' in the BTS. Have I missed some

/etc/ld.so.preload handling in package maintainer scripts?

2002-02-06 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, I am currently preparing a package that needs to establish a pre-loaded library via /etc/ld.so.preload, and I'd like to discuss ways to do this in a non-destructive way without breaking the system. This is what I think of: configure: - ask user via debconf if she wants to have the library i

ssldump package, key signed, what now?

2002-02-06 Thread nicholas black
hi there. i've rolled eric rescorla's ssldump utility (version 0.9b2) into a deb. after using it for a time in our office, i've decided to submit it here. you may find the deb at http://gtf.org/~dank/ssldump/ssldump_0.9b2-1_i386.deb my gpg key is available at finer keystores everywhere (but de

Re: Hi!

2002-02-06 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:15:19PM +1000, David Findlay wrote: > I'm new here and want to get into Debian Development after working out an > idea for a new debian program while at the Debian mini-conf at Linux.conf.au. > I'm planning to write an apt method(or similiar) that will allow you to bui

Re: Adopting package

2002-02-06 Thread Gergely Nagy
> Have I missed something? Are you sure that the Maintainer and the Changed-By field in the .changes file are the same? If they are different, it will count as an NMU from dinstalls point of view. I'd simply bounce the installation-acknowledgement mail to the relevant [EMAIL PROTECTED] address.

Adopting package

2002-02-06 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Hi! I (for the first time) adopted a pacakage (radvd). I uploaded a new version with a changed 'Maintainer:' field, and am now listed as maintainer for that package. However, the bugs I closed in the changelog are 'fixed' not 'closed' and are listed as 'fixed in NMU' in the BTS. Have I missed som

Hi!

2002-02-06 Thread David Findlay
I'm new here and want to get into Debian Development after working out an idea for a new debian program while at the Debian mini-conf at Linux.conf.au. I'm planning to write an apt method(or similiar) that will allow you to build packages from source, but with full optimisations for your process

Hi!

2002-02-06 Thread David Findlay
I'm new here and want to get into Debian Development after working out an idea for a new debian program while at the Debian mini-conf at Linux.conf.au. I'm planning to write an apt method(or similiar) that will allow you to build packages from source, but with full optimisations for your proces