[È«º¸¸ÞÀÏ]¹«·á¼ºÀÎÁ¤º¸ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

2001-11-14 Thread freeM
¹«·á¼ºÀθ¸È­,¼ºÀοµÈ­Á¤º¸ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. =ºÐ¸í Àú´Â À̸ÞÀÏ Á¦¸ñ¿¡ 'È«º¸¸ÞÀÏ'ÀÓÀ» ¹àÇû½À´Ï´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Îº¸½ÇºÐ¸¸ º¸½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ°í, ±×·¸Áö ¾ÊÀ¸¸é ¹Ù·Î »èÁ¦°¡ °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù.±ÍÇÏÀÇ ¼ö½ÅÀǻ縦 Á¸ÁßÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù.±ÍÇÏÀÇ À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅÍ³Ý °Ë»öÀ» ÇÏ´Ù°

Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

2001-11-14 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:47:04PM +0100, Florian Hinzmann wrote: > On 04-Nov-2001 Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > the old version is "nonexistent". Normally one would expect the > > source distribution to include these files (INSTALL, install-sh, etc). > > No, I am packaging from the official rele

Looking for a mentor, MPB package

2001-11-14 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, After a very little work (debhelper worked really fine), I have packaged the MIT Photonic Bands package, along with libctl and h5utils, which are needed (only recommended for h5utils) by mpb. This software is very widely used in optoelectronics research, as it allows to compute the band struct

Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

2001-11-14 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:47:04PM +0100, Florian Hinzmann wrote: > On 04-Nov-2001 Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > the old version is "nonexistent". Normally one would expect the > > source distribution to include these files (INSTALL, install-sh, etc). > > No, I am packaging from the official rel

Looking for a mentor, MPB package

2001-11-14 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, After a very little work (debhelper worked really fine), I have packaged the MIT Photonic Bands package, along with libctl and h5utils, which are needed (only recommended for h5utils) by mpb. This software is very widely used in optoelectronics research, as it allows to compute the band struc

Re: dpkg-statoverride question

2001-11-14 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 05:44:38PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > On Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:38:14 -0200 > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote: > > > My package (avrprog) uses dpkg-statoverride in the postinst script. > > >

Re: dpkg-statoverride question

2001-11-14 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> if I am not misunderstanding anything, no package needs to depend on > dpkg as it is part of base am I wrong? (of course a versioned dependency > is in order...) > close. No package needs to declare a depends on anything marked 'Essential', these just happen to be in base. But so are many oth

Re: dpkg-statoverride question

2001-11-14 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:38:14 -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote: > > My package (avrprog) uses dpkg-statoverride in the postinst script. > > Should I put a pre-depends on dpkg? > > No. A simple versioned depends is eno

Re: dpkg-statoverride question

2001-11-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 09:35:48AM -0200, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote: > Hi Mentors, > > My package (avrprog) uses dpkg-statoverride in the postinst script. > Should I put a pre-depends on dpkg? Please be certain that you are using it correctly; you should be vary careful about doing anything m

Re: dpkg-statoverride question

2001-11-14 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 05:44:38PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > On Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:38:14 -0200 > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote: > > > My package (avrprog) uses dpkg-statoverride in the postinst script. > > >

Re: dpkg-statoverride question

2001-11-14 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> if I am not misunderstanding anything, no package needs to depend on > dpkg as it is part of base am I wrong? (of course a versioned dependency > is in order...) > close. No package needs to declare a depends on anything marked 'Essential', these just happen to be in base. But so are many ot

Re: dpkg-statoverride question

2001-11-14 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:38:14 -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote: > > My package (avrprog) uses dpkg-statoverride in the postinst script. > > Should I put a pre-depends on dpkg? > > No. A simple versioned depends is en

Re: dpkg-statoverride question

2001-11-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 09:35:48AM -0200, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote: > Hi Mentors, > > My package (avrprog) uses dpkg-statoverride in the postinst script. > Should I put a pre-depends on dpkg? Please be certain that you are using it correctly; you should be vary careful about doing anything

Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

2001-11-14 Thread A Mennucc1
hi On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:47:04PM +0100, Florian Hinzmann wrote: > Hello! > > > On 04-Nov-2001 Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > In your original mail, the question was what to do about symbolic > > links like "missing --> /usr/share/automake/missing". The answer is: > > replace them by the f

Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

2001-11-14 Thread A Mennucc1
hi On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 03:33:18PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Florian, > > In your original mail, the question was what to do about symbolic > links like "missing --> /usr/share/automake/missing". The answer is: > replace them by the file to which they are linked. not necessarily for

Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

2001-11-14 Thread A Mennucc1
hi I have started seeing these errors myself a few months ago problem was, I had upgraded to woody, and the new autotools create symlinks by default instead of real files solution (from my xmorph package): run ./autogen.sh once, and put in the debian/rules build: build-stamp build-

Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

2001-11-14 Thread A Mennucc1
hi On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:47:04PM +0100, Florian Hinzmann wrote: > Hello! > > > On 04-Nov-2001 Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > In your original mail, the question was what to do about symbolic > > links like "missing --> /usr/share/automake/missing". The answer is: > > replace them by the

Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

2001-11-14 Thread A Mennucc1
hi On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 03:33:18PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Florian, > > In your original mail, the question was what to do about symbolic > links like "missing --> /usr/share/automake/missing". The answer is: > replace them by the file to which they are linked. not necessarily fo

Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

2001-11-14 Thread A Mennucc1
hi I have started seeing these errors myself a few months ago problem was, I had upgraded to woody, and the new autotools create symlinks by default instead of real files solution (from my xmorph package): run ./autogen.sh once, and put in the debian/rules build: build-stamp build

Re: dpkg-statoverride question

2001-11-14 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote: > My package (avrprog) uses dpkg-statoverride in the postinst script. > Should I put a pre-depends on dpkg? No. A simple versioned depends is enough. You only need pre-depends when you use a package's programs in preinst. -- "One disk to rule

dpkg-statoverride question

2001-11-14 Thread Pedro Zorzenon Neto
Hi Mentors, My package (avrprog) uses dpkg-statoverride in the postinst script. Should I put a pre-depends on dpkg? Thanks, Pedro

Re: dpkg-statoverride question

2001-11-14 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote: > My package (avrprog) uses dpkg-statoverride in the postinst script. > Should I put a pre-depends on dpkg? No. A simple versioned depends is enough. You only need pre-depends when you use a package's programs in preinst. -- "One disk to rul

dpkg-statoverride question

2001-11-14 Thread Pedro Zorzenon Neto
Hi Mentors, My package (avrprog) uses dpkg-statoverride in the postinst script. Should I put a pre-depends on dpkg? Thanks, Pedro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]