Re: changing upstream name

2001-11-03 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > What should I do when upstream name is changes? > > I want to upload following new package: > > source: > commons-beanutils > commons-collections > binary: > libcommons-beanutils-java > libcommons-collections-java > > If commons-beanutils -> libcommons-beanutils-ja

Re: changing upstream name

2001-11-03 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > What should I do when upstream name is changes? > > I want to upload following new package: > > source: > commons-beanutils > commons-collections > binary: > libcommons-beanutils-java > libcommons-collections-java > > If commons-beanutils -> libcommons-beanutils-j

changing upstream name

2001-11-03 Thread Takashi Okamoto
I have a question about change upstream name. I'm mainting jakarta-commons(http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/). In the past, upstream was just one source jakarta-commons and I built following packgage from it: source package: jakarta-commons binary package: libcommons-beanutils

Re: Applicant w/ package

2001-11-03 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 05:30:57PM -0300, ReivaX wrote: > Hi ppl in this nice list :) > Im looking to be an applicant to debian developer. It seems i need an > advocate... I want more info on how to get someone know about me.. > I have packaged mplayer (the video player for X) with gui support and

changing upstream name

2001-11-03 Thread Takashi Okamoto
I have a question about change upstream name. I'm mainting jakarta-commons(http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/). In the past, upstream was just one source jakarta-commons and I built following packgage from it: source package: jakarta-commons binary package: libcommons-beanutil

Re: Applicant w/ package

2001-11-03 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 05:30:57PM -0300, ReivaX wrote: > Hi ppl in this nice list :) > Im looking to be an applicant to debian developer. It seems i need an > advocate... I want more info on how to get someone know about me.. > I have packaged mplayer (the video player for X) with gui support and

Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

2001-11-03 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include Florian Hinzmann wrote on Sat Nov 03, 2001 um 01:27:23PM: > Hello! > > Would you consider reading > /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz and then > reading my mail again? I did. And I do not havy anything to change in my last statement. > Yes, I do run an (modified) autogen.s

Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

2001-11-03 Thread Florian Hinzmann
Hello! Would you consider reading /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz and then reading my mail again? On 03-Nov-2001 Eduard Bloch wrote: > Is there an autogen.sh script which you have executed? Or something like > libtoolize -f? It seems like the autoconf system of your package has

Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

2001-11-03 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include Florian Hinzmann wrote on Sat Nov 03, 2001 um 01:27:23PM: > Hello! > > Would you consider reading > /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz and then > reading my mail again? I did. And I do not havy anything to change in my last statement. > Yes, I do run an (modified) autogen.

Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

2001-11-03 Thread Florian Hinzmann
Hello! Would you consider reading /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz and then reading my mail again? On 03-Nov-2001 Eduard Bloch wrote: > Is there an autogen.sh script which you have executed? Or something like > libtoolize -f? It seems like the autoconf system of your package has

Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

2001-11-03 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include Florian Hinzmann wrote on Fri Nov 02, 2001 um 11:58:03AM: > All these are symlinks from to /usr/share/autoconf/. > Anyone had this? Anyone knows what to do about it? Is there an autogen.sh script which you have executed? Or something like libtoolize -f? It seems like the autoconf system