On 25 Oct 2001, James Troup wrote:
> Anybody can update existing keys but new keys will be ignored.
> Alexander's key is new.
OK, as I want to switch from PGP to GPG, I did as told (and mentioned in
the Developers's reference) and read
/usr/share/doc/debian-keyring/README.gz
Where it says
[sni
I've got a package of the Xfm filemanager.
One of the nice things about Xfm is that it has very few dependencies.
It probably does need however quite a few `Suggests', since it
bascially launches other applications. Perhaps someone can give me
some advice on this.
All those people here who st
So... Does anyone want to sponsor this package? I got no replies (about a
sponsor) the first time, so I thought I'd pester you guys again...
Thanks,
David
--On Sunday, October 21, 2001 01:30:28 -0700 David Caldwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
No one wanted to sponsor my eol package
On 25 Oct 2001, James Troup wrote:
> Anybody can update existing keys but new keys will be ignored.
> Alexander's key is new.
OK, as I want to switch from PGP to GPG, I did as told (and mentioned in
the Developers's reference) and read
/usr/share/doc/debian-keyring/README.gz
Where it says
[sn
I've got a package of the Xfm filemanager.
One of the nice things about Xfm is that it has very few dependencies.
It probably does need however quite a few `Suggests', since it
bascially launches other applications. Perhaps someone can give me
some advice on this.
All those people here who s
So... Does anyone want to sponsor this package? I got no replies (about a
sponsor) the first time, so I thought I'd pester you guys again...
Thanks,
David
--On Sunday, October 21, 2001 01:30:28 -0700 David Caldwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> No one wanted to sponsor my eol pack
Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a similiar problem (lost key) and mailed keyring-maint a
> month or longer ago and didn't get any response yet
So, in the future, send some more mail as a pester/reminder? Anyway,
I've added your new key.
--
James
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Just uploading is pretty standard. Anybody can upload anybody's
> > public key.
>
> Anybody can update existing keys but new keys will be ignored.
> Alexander's key is new.
>
I have a similiar problem (lo
On 25-Oct-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 05:24:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Lintians says:
>>
>> E: lgenereral source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.cache
>> E: blah blah blah config.status
>>
>> When I edit original source not to have these files, I hav
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 05:24:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lintians says:
>
> E: lgenereral source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.cache
> E: blah blah blah config.status
>
> When I edit original source not to have these files, I have a problem
> while uploading the updated ve
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> E: lgenereral source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.cache
> E: blah blah blah config.status
>
> When I edit original source not to have these files, I have a problem
> while uploading the updated version:
Remove config.status and config.c
Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a similiar problem (lost key) and mailed keyring-maint a
> month or longer ago and didn't get any response yet
So, in the future, send some more mail as a pester/reminder? Anyway,
I've added your new key.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Just uploading is pretty standard. Anybody can upload anybody's
> > public key.
>
> Anybody can update existing keys but new keys will be ignored.
> Alexander's key is new.
>
I have a similiar problem (l
Lintians says:
E: lgenereral source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.cache
E: blah blah blah config.status
When I edit original source not to have these files, I have a problem
while uploading the updated version:
Rejected: md5sum for
/org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/l/lgeneral/lgenera
On 25-Oct-2001 Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 05:24:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Lintians says:
>>
>> E: lgenereral source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.cache
>> E: blah blah blah config.status
>>
>> When I edit original source not to have these files, I ha
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just uploading is pretty standard. Anybody can upload anybody's
> public key.
Anybody can update existing keys but new keys will be ignored.
Alexander's key is new.
--
James
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 05:24:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lintians says:
>
> E: lgenereral source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.cache
> E: blah blah blah config.status
>
> When I edit original source not to have these files, I have a problem
> while uploading the updated v
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> E: lgenereral source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.cache
> E: blah blah blah config.status
>
> When I edit original source not to have these files, I have a problem
> while uploading the updated version:
Remove config.status and config.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 06:41:05PM +0200, Alexander List wrote:
> Could you please give me a hint how to get my new DSA public key into the
> keyring?
>
> I guess just uploading it to the keyserver won't do, as anybody could do
> that without proving identity...
Just uploading is pretty standard.
Lintians says:
E: lgenereral source: autoconf-generated-file-in-source config.cache
E: blah blah blah config.status
When I edit original source not to have these files, I have a problem
while uploading the updated version:
Rejected: md5sum for
/org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/l/lgeneral/lgener
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just uploading is pretty standard. Anybody can upload anybody's
> public key.
Anybody can update existing keys but new keys will be ignored.
Alexander's key is new.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 06:41:05PM +0200, Alexander List wrote:
> Could you please give me a hint how to get my new DSA public key into the
> keyring?
>
> I guess just uploading it to the keyserver won't do, as anybody could do
> that without proving identity...
Just uploading is pretty standard
22 matches
Mail list logo
