Re: pseudo-image-kit-2.0

On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 09:11:01PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > I find the pseudo-image-kit-2.0 process overly complicated and > difficult to use, even for an experienced unix administrator. That's very true. > If I were to write a better drop-in replacement, would it be > considered for replacm

Re: Packaging

Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > have to link your program explicitly with the trace library then? > Yes > > W: mdb: library-not-linked-against-libc ./usr/lib/libmdb.so.0.1 > > You should correct this. Add "-lc" to the ld call (or use $(CC) for > linking). > Impossible cause I redefine malloc, ... >

Re: pseudo-image-kit-2.0

On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 09:11:01PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > I find the pseudo-image-kit-2.0 process overly complicated and > difficult to use, even for an experienced unix administrator. That's very true. > If I were to write a better drop-in replacement, would it be > considered for replac

Re: Packaging

Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > have to link your program explicitly with the trace library then? > Yes > > W: mdb: library-not-linked-against-libc ./usr/lib/libmdb.so.0.1 > > You should correct this. Add "-lc" to the ld call (or use $(CC) for > linking). > Impossible cause I redefine malloc, ... >