Hi Tommy!
You wrote:
> Hi guys. I'm trying to put together a package that contains a single
> binary program and have followed all the steps in the New Maintainor's
> guide and have managed to form the binary package. For some reason when I
> do:
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot it compiles fine a
Hi guys. I'm trying to put together a package that contains a single
binary program and have followed all the steps in the New Maintainor's
guide and have managed to form the binary package. For some reason when I
do:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot it compiles fine and asks me for my gpg
password whi
Hi guys. I'm trying to put together a package that contains a single
binary program and have followed all the steps in the New Maintainor's
guide and have managed to form the binary package. For some reason when I
do:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot it compiles fine and asks me for my gpg
password wh
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 08:04:42PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Since English is the lingua franca of debian-legal, I think the main reason
> for wanting licenses in English is so that we can protect ourselves from legal
> troubles.
Can you assure programmers for all over the world that an engli
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since English is the lingua franca of debian-legal, I think the main reason
> for wanting licenses in English is so that we can protect ourselves from legal
> troubles.
How? Are there even any lawyers subscribed to debian-legal?
Which languages do th
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> ...
> > Please go ahead. If someone non-Swedish finds the software in
> > Debian packages and feels it is very useful, he/she may start
> > a project to translate it into English or other languages. It
> > is exciting!
> > However, the software wil
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:46:23AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> hi,
>
> i generate a config file in my postinst, hence it's not marked as
> a conffile. so if the package is purged i have to remove it by
> hand in the postinst:
> # purge the config file which is created in the postinst script
> i
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 08:04:42PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Since English is the lingua franca of debian-legal, I think the main reason
> for wanting licenses in English is so that we can protect ourselves from legal
> troubles.
Can you assure programmers for all over the world that an engl
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since English is the lingua franca of debian-legal, I think the main reason
> for wanting licenses in English is so that we can protect ourselves from legal
> troubles.
How? Are there even any lawyers subscribed to debian-legal?
Which languages do t
hi,
i generate a config file in my postinst, hence it's not marked as
a conffile. so if the package is purged i have to remove it by
hand in the postinst:
# purge the config file which is created in the postinst script
if [ "$1" = purge ] ; then
rm /etc/modlogan/modlogan.conf
fi
ok, i've
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> ...
> > Please go ahead. If someone non-Swedish finds the software in
> > Debian packages and feels it is very useful, he/she may start
> > a project to translate it into English or other languages. It
> > is exciting!
> > However, the software wi
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:46:23AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> hi,
>
> i generate a config file in my postinst, hence it's not marked as
> a conffile. so if the package is purged i have to remove it by
> hand in the postinst:
> # purge the config file which is created in the postinst script
>
hi,
i generate a config file in my postinst, hence it's not marked as
a conffile. so if the package is purged i have to remove it by
hand in the postinst:
# purge the config file which is created in the postinst script
if [ "$1" = purge ] ; then
rm /etc/modlogan/modlogan.conf
fi
ok, i've
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 07:18:09PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> > In Texinfo sources, you'd write that like this:
>
> The source document is an SGML file, which is run through sgml2info.
There ought to be a way to do it in your SGML flavor, I guess...
> > It's either that or having to specify
Josip Rodin:
> Your info file should have something like this near the top:
It hasn't. It starts like this:
===[ cut ]===
This is lyskom.info, produced by makeinfo version 4.0 from
/home/peter/tmp/sgmltmp.lyskom32294.info.2.
\input texinfo
^_
File: lyskom.info, Node: Top, Next: Inledning,
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 04:40:08PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> What does this error message mean?
>
> "No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'.
> install-info: unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up"
Your info file should have something like this near the t
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 07:18:09PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> > In Texinfo sources, you'd write that like this:
>
> The source document is an SGML file, which is run through sgml2info.
There ought to be a way to do it in your SGML flavor, I guess...
> > It's either that or having to specify
"CW" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CW> Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> debhelper isn't compliant with the latest policy (Change with example
>> path).
CW> I think you're misreading the upgrading-checklist (well, it could
I've just read upgrading-checklist and
Josip Rodin:
> Your info file should have something like this near the top:
It hasn't. It starts like this:
===[ cut ]===
This is lyskom.info, produced by makeinfo version 4.0 from
/home/peter/tmp/sgmltmp.lyskom32294.info.2.
\input texinfo
^_
File: lyskom.info, Node: Top, Next: Inledning
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 04:40:08PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> What does this error message mean?
>
> "No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'.
> install-info: unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up"
Your info file should have something like this near the
What does this error message mean?
"No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'.
install-info: unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up"
I get it when trying to install my program, which has an info file. I
have not done anything special about it more than let debhe
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 09:34:03AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At Sat, 19 May 2001 12:17:09 +0200 (CEST),
> peter karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What's the thought about software which is only available in a
> > non-English language? I am thinking about packaging a client f
"CW" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CW> Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> debhelper isn't compliant with the latest policy (Change with example
>> path).
CW> I think you're misreading the upgrading-checklist (well, it could
I've just read upgrading-checklist and
What does this error message mean?
"No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'.
install-info: unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up"
I get it when trying to install my program, which has an info file. I
have not done anything special about it more than let debh
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>debhelper isn't compliant with the latest policy (Change with example
>path).
I think you're misreading the upgrading-checklist (well, it could
probably be clearer there anyway). debhelper is still correct to install
examples in general into /usr/shar
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 09:34:03AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At Sat, 19 May 2001 12:17:09 +0200 (CEST),
> peter karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What's the thought about software which is only available in a
> > non-English language? I am thinking about packaging a client
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>debhelper isn't compliant with the latest policy (Change with example
>path).
I think you're misreading the upgrading-checklist (well, it could
probably be clearer there anyway). debhelper is still correct to install
examples in general into /usr/sha
"CL" == Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CL> On Sun, 20 May 2001 00:42:10 +0200, Abraham vd Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Hi Colin!
>>
>> > >However, if I run debstd, I get the following:
>> >
>> > One good question is "why are you still using debstd?" :)
>>
>> Hiehie, yea
"CL" == Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CL> On Sun, 20 May 2001 00:42:10 +0200, Abraham vd Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Colin!
>>
>> > >However, if I run debstd, I get the following:
>> >
>> > One good question is "why are you still using debstd?" :)
>>
>> Hiehie, yea
On Sun, 20 May 2001 00:42:10 +0200, Abraham vd Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Colin!
>
> > >However, if I run debstd, I get the following:
> >
> > One good question is "why are you still using debstd?" :)
>
> Hiehie, yeah, I discovered that debstd is ancient (so is 3.1.1 standard,
> we'r
30 matches
Mail list logo
