On Sun, 20 May 2001 00:42:10 +0200, Abraham vd Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Colin!
>
> > >However, if I run debstd, I get the following:
> >
> > One good question is "why are you still using debstd?" :)
>
> Hiehie, yeah, I discovered that debstd is ancient (so is 3.1.1 standard,
> we'
Hi,
At Sat, 19 May 2001 12:17:09 +0200 (CEST),
peter karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the thought about software which is only available in a
> non-English language? I am thinking about packaging a client for the
> LysKOM server, which is only available in Swedish (there's some suppor
On Sun, 20 May 2001 at 00:42:10 +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> Hi Colin!
> > One good question is "why are you still using debstd?" :)
>
> Hiehie, yeah, I discovered that debstd is ancient (so is 3.1.1 standard,
> we're already at 3.5.2 :P)
>
> Anyway, I fixed it (just used dh_make, etc.)
>
>
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 04:22:41AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just adopted xabacus.
>
> It conflicts with xmabacus because both try to install
> the same config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/Abacus.
>
maybe using an abacus-common package which owns that conffile...
my question now is, is a
Hi,
At Sat, 19 May 2001 12:17:09 +0200 (CEST),
peter karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the thought about software which is only available in a
> non-English language? I am thinking about packaging a client for the
> LysKOM server, which is only available in Swedish (there's some suppo
Hi Colin!
> >However, if I run debstd, I get the following:
>
> One good question is "why are you still using debstd?" :)
Hiehie, yeah, I discovered that debstd is ancient (so is 3.1.1 standard,
we're already at 3.5.2 :P)
Anyway, I fixed it (just used dh_make, etc.)
I really think we should d
On Sun, 20 May 2001 at 00:42:10 +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> Hi Colin!
> > One good question is "why are you still using debstd?" :)
>
> Hiehie, yeah, I discovered that debstd is ancient (so is 3.1.1 standard,
> we're already at 3.5.2 :P)
>
> Anyway, I fixed it (just used dh_make, etc.)
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) wrote:
>debmake/debstd's development was frozen some time ago, so I doubt it.
>Most people [1] who use a helper package these days use debhelper.
[1] http://kitenet.net/programs/debhelper/stats/
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 04:22:41AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just adopted xabacus.
>
> It conflicts with xmabacus because both try to install
> the same config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/Abacus.
>
maybe using an abacus-common package which owns that conffile...
my question now is, is
Abraham van der Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've just upgraded one of my package's control files from 3.0.1 to 3.1.1 and
>now I can't get the damn thing to build correctly.
>
>The one problem I'm having is with the configuration file. I have the
>following in conffiles:
>
>< snip
Hi Peter,
On Sat, 19 May 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> What's the thought about software which is only available in a
> non-English language? I am thinking about packaging a client for the
> LysKOM server, which is only available in Swedish (there's some support
> for gettext, but no-one has both
Hi Colin!
> >However, if I run debstd, I get the following:
>
> One good question is "why are you still using debstd?" :)
Hiehie, yeah, I discovered that debstd is ancient (so is 3.1.1 standard,
we're already at 3.5.2 :P)
Anyway, I fixed it (just used dh_make, etc.)
I really think we should
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) wrote:
>debmake/debstd's development was frozen some time ago, so I doubt it.
>Most people [1] who use a helper package these days use debhelper.
[1] http://kitenet.net/programs/debhelper/stats/
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECT
Abraham van der Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've just upgraded one of my package's control files from 3.0.1 to 3.1.1 and
>now I can't get the damn thing to build correctly.
>
>The one problem I'm having is with the configuration file. I have the
>following in conffiles:
>
>< snip
Hi Peter,
On Sat, 19 May 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> What's the thought about software which is only available in a
> non-English language? I am thinking about packaging a client for the
> LysKOM server, which is only available in Swedish (there's some support
> for gettext, but no-one has bot
Hi!
I've just upgraded one of my package's control files from 3.0.1 to 3.1.1 and
now I can't get the damn thing to build correctly.
The one problem I'm having is with the configuration file. I have the
following in conffiles:
< snip <--< snip <--< snip <
[EMAIL PR
Hi!
I've just upgraded one of my package's control files from 3.0.1 to 3.1.1 and
now I can't get the damn thing to build correctly.
The one problem I'm having is with the configuration file. I have the
following in conffiles:
< snip <--< snip <--< snip <
abz@oasi
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 12:17:09PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What's the thought about software which is only available in a
> non-English language? I am thinking about packaging a client for the
> LysKOM server, which is only available in Swedish (there's some support
> for gettext, b
Hi!
What's the thought about software which is only available in a
non-English language? I am thinking about packaging a client for the
LysKOM server, which is only available in Swedish (there's some support
for gettext, but no-one has bother translating the program into any
other languages yet).
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 12:17:09PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What's the thought about software which is only available in a
> non-English language? I am thinking about packaging a client for the
> LysKOM server, which is only available in Swedish (there's some support
> for gettext,
Hi!
What's the thought about software which is only available in a
non-English language? I am thinking about packaging a client for the
LysKOM server, which is only available in Swedish (there's some support
for gettext, but no-one has bother translating the program into any
other languages yet).
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> I'm packaging mp3kult (see #94999), and having a bit of trouble to make
> a perfect debconfized postinst for it. I already have a few nice tests
> that ensure a more or less smooth installation, but some other tests
> I plan to include would require MyS
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> I'm packaging mp3kult (see #94999), and having a bit of trouble to make
> a perfect debconfized postinst for it. I already have a few nice tests
> that ensure a more or less smooth installation, but some other tests
> I plan to include would require My
23 matches
Mail list logo
