On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:51:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > dpkg-buildpackage places the tcl script in debian/tmp/usr/bin as expected,
>
> That is the problem. It doesn't belong there. It belongs in
> debian//usr/bin and you should make sure that your Makefile
> installs it there.
Th
Thanks to all those who replied. The problem with the upstream number
numbering scheme is this. Let's say they have a release 0.85. They
publish it as webmin-0.85.tar.gz Then later on they update one of those
modules. They will put it out seperately as some_module-0.85.1.tar.gz .
So far so goo
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 04:30:15PM -0800, Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake
forth:
>
> > It actually works with tcl 8.0, 8.1 and 8.2 you are right. So what about :
> >
> > Depends: tcl8.0 | tcl8.1 | tcl8.2
>
> Or mayby just depend on a version greater than 8.0, as you do with
> debhelper in you
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:51:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > dpkg-buildpackage places the tcl script in debian/tmp/usr/bin as expected,
>
> That is the problem. It doesn't belong there. It belongs in
> debian//usr/bin and you should make sure that your Makefile
> installs it there.
T
> It actually works with tcl 8.0, 8.1 and 8.2 you are right. So what about :
>
> Depends: tcl8.0 | tcl8.1 | tcl8.2
Or mayby just depend on a version greater than 8.0, as you do with
debhelper in you build depend. But Mayby tcl breaks backward
compatability a lot and you thing it would be better
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:05:39PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 03:56:40PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm building a package which is a simple tcl script. No binaries. Do I need
> > to
> > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} ?
> >
> > Or is this fine :
> >
> > [EMAIL PRO
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 09:11:59AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> - Forwarded message from "Graf, Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> From: "Graf, Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Changes to /etc/init.d/networking
>
>
- Forwarded message from "Graf, Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "Graf, Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Changes to /etc/init.d/networking
I'm on holiday until 20.4.01.
- End forwarded message -
Yearg! An
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 04:30:15PM -0800, Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake forth:
>
> > It actually works with tcl 8.0, 8.1 and 8.2 you are right. So what about :
> >
> > Depends: tcl8.0 | tcl8.1 | tcl8.2
>
> Or mayby just depend on a version greater than 8.0, as you do with
> debhelper in you
> It actually works with tcl 8.0, 8.1 and 8.2 you are right. So what about :
>
> Depends: tcl8.0 | tcl8.1 | tcl8.2
Or mayby just depend on a version greater than 8.0, as you do with
debhelper in you build depend. But Mayby tcl breaks backward
compatability a lot and you thing it would be better
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:05:39PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 03:56:40PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm building a package which is a simple tcl script. No binaries. Do I need to
> > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} ?
> >
> > Or is this fine :
> >
> > [eric@femto:~/
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:18:43PM +0200, Christian SPENER wrote:
>
>
>
> this are my last errors, don't know how to fix them
> also the programmer of the program doesn't know how to fix them, so someone
> can giveme some hints, where the problem could be?
[...]
> W: ktouch: zero-byte-file-
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 09:11:59AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> - Forwarded message from "Graf, Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> From: "Graf, Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Changes to /etc/init.d/networking
>
- Forwarded message from "Graf, Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "Graf, Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Changes to /etc/init.d/networking
I'm on holiday until 20.4.01.
- End forwarded message -
Yearg! A
Fellow Debian developers and others,
I'm packaging wmix and now the upstream authour has decided to change
the name a bit from: wmix-2.11-oss.tar.gz to: wmix-2.2.tar.gz
The package is named wmix should this namechange be any problem or do
I just need to upgrade the wmix package with the latest u
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:18:43PM +0200, Christian SPENER wrote:
>
>
>
> this are my last errors, don't know how to fix them
> also the programmer of the program doesn't know how to fix them, so someone
> can giveme some hints, where the problem could be?
[...]
> W: ktouch: zero-byte-file
Fellow Debian developers and others,
I'm packaging wmix and now the upstream authour has decided to change
the name a bit from: wmix-2.11-oss.tar.gz to: wmix-2.2.tar.gz
The package is named wmix should this namechange be any problem or do
I just need to upgrade the wmix package with the latest
Hi,
I'm packaging the Commom Multimedia Library, from UCL. It is used by
some MBone programs such as sdr and rat. The name of the upstream
distribution is just "common" (common-1.2.0.tar.gz). When it first
entered Debian, (release 1.0.5), it was named uclcommon. Later on
(release 1.0.6), its name
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 03:56:40PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm building a package which is a simple tcl script. No binaries. Do I need to
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} ?
>
> Or is this fine :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/s25manager-0.82]$ less debian/control
> Source: s25manager
> Sect
> dpkg-buildpackage places the tcl script in debian/tmp/usr/bin as expected,
That is the problem. It doesn't belong there. It belongs in
debian//usr/bin and you should make sure that your Makefile
installs it there.
Note the comment:
> # Add here commands to install the package into debi
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:11:40PM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 03:09:08AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > dpkg-source: error: per-package paragraph 2 in control info file is missing
> > Package line
>
> The error it points to is the missing second paragraph in t
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 01:05:40AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:58:31PM +0200, Christian SPENER wrote:
[...]
>
> > when i look into into the deb file, under CONTENTS there are this dirs
> > bin
> > usr
> > share
>
> What is "CONTENTS"? How do you look into the deb f
I'm building a package for a cellphone manager. It's a simple tcl script, there
are no binaries.
dpkg-buildpackage places the tcl script in debian/tmp/usr/bin as expected,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/s25manager-0.82]$ ls -l debian/tmp/usr/bin/
total 48
-rwxr-xr-x1 eric eric46964 a
I'm building a package which is a simple tcl script. No binaries. Do I need to
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} ?
Or is this fine :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/s25manager-0.82]$ less debian/control
Source: s25manager
Section: main/comm
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:49:44AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > A package of mine requires the libstlport library. This library installs
> > as:
> >
> > $ ls -l /usr/lib/libstlport*
> > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 Apr 3 12:54
> > /usr/lib/libstlport.a -> libstlport_gcc.a
>
Hi,
I'm packaging the Commom Multimedia Library, from UCL. It is used by
some MBone programs such as sdr and rat. The name of the upstream
distribution is just "common" (common-1.2.0.tar.gz). When it first
entered Debian, (release 1.0.5), it was named uclcommon. Later on
(release 1.0.6), its nam
> A package of mine requires the libstlport library. This library installs
> as:
>
> $ ls -l /usr/lib/libstlport*
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 Apr 3 12:54 /usr/lib/libstlport.a
> -> libstlport_gcc.a
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 Apr 3 12:54
> /usr/lib/libstlport.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 03:56:40PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm building a package which is a simple tcl script. No binaries. Do I need to
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} ?
>
> Or is this fine :
>
> [eric@femto:~/debian/s25manager-0.82]$ less debian/control
> Source: s25manager
> Section:
> dpkg-buildpackage places the tcl script in debian/tmp/usr/bin as expected,
That is the problem. It doesn't belong there. It belongs in
debian//usr/bin and you should make sure that your Makefile
installs it there.
Note the comment:
> # Add here commands to install the package into deb
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:11:40PM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 03:09:08AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > dpkg-source: error: per-package paragraph 2 in control info file is missing
>Package line
>
> The error it points to is the missing second paragraph in the
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 01:05:40AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:58:31PM +0200, Christian SPENER wrote:
[...]
>
> > when i look into into the deb file, under CONTENTS there are this dirs
> > bin
> > usr
> > share
>
> What is "CONTENTS"? How do you look into the deb
I'm building a package for a cellphone manager. It's a simple tcl script, there
are no binaries.
dpkg-buildpackage places the tcl script in debian/tmp/usr/bin as expected,
[eric@femto:~/debian/s25manager-0.82]$ ls -l debian/tmp/usr/bin/
total 48
-rwxr-xr-x1 eric eric46964 avr 12
I'm building a package which is a simple tcl script. No binaries. Do I need to
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} ?
Or is this fine :
[eric@femto:~/debian/s25manager-0.82]$ less debian/control
Source: s25manager
Section: main/comm
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bu
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:49:44AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > A package of mine requires the libstlport library. This library installs
> > as:
> >
> > $ ls -l /usr/lib/libstlport*
> > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 Apr 3 12:54 /usr/lib/libstlport.a ->
>libstlport_gcc.a
> >
> A package of mine requires the libstlport library. This library installs
> as:
>
> $ ls -l /usr/lib/libstlport*
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 Apr 3 12:54 /usr/lib/libstlport.a ->
>libstlport_gcc.a
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 Apr 3 12:54 /usr/lib/libstlport.so
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:21:45PM +0200, Davide Puricelli wrote:
> Ask Culus :)
I put a Cc: to -admin. :)
--
Christian Surchi | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FLUG: http://www.firenze.linux.it | Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org
-> http://www.firenze.li
Hi all
With Berkeley DB 3.x now in unstable, I'm busy packaging Cyrus 2.x. I have
one major problem tho' - how best to handle upgrading from Cyrus 1.5/1.6 to
2.x.
First a bit of background - Cyrus is a POP/IMAP/NNTP server that stores
mail in its own spool hierarchy (currently /var/spool/cyrus) a
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 11:52:53AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:45:17AM +0200, Davide Puricelli wrote:
> > lully.debian.org has:
> > ii g++2.95.3-5
>
> What about an up-to-date db.d.o/machines.cgi? It says that lully has potato
> and is down.
>
> Thank
this are my last errors, don't know how to fix them
also the programmer of the program doesn't know how to fix them, so someone
can giveme some hints, where the problem could be?
thx
chris
# lintian -i ktouch_1.0-8_i386.changes
warning: lintian's authors do not recommend running it with ro
A package of mine requires the libstlport library. This library installs
as:
$ ls -l /usr/lib/libstlport*
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 Apr 3 12:54 /usr/lib/libstlport.a
-> libstlport_gcc.a
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 Apr 3 12:54 /usr/lib/libstlport.so
-> libstlport
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:45:17AM +0200, Davide Puricelli wrote:
> lully.debian.org has:
> ii g++2.95.3-5
What about an up-to-date db.d.o/machines.cgi? It says that lully has potato and
is down.
Thanks.
--
Christian Surchi | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FLUG:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:07:37AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a package which the g++ in potato (2.95.2) is not able to
> compile correctly. Is there an Alpha box which has a recent (2.95.3 or
> 3.x) g++ (perhaps in a chroot) where I can try building the thing?
>
> The only c
Hi,
I have a package which the g++ in potato (2.95.2) is not able to
compile correctly. Is there an Alpha box which has a recent (2.95.3 or
3.x) g++ (perhaps in a chroot) where I can try building the thing?
The only currently open Debian Alpha machine I know of is faure, and
it has the old gcc su
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:21:45PM +0200, Davide Puricelli wrote:
> Ask Culus :)
I put a Cc: to -admin. :)
--
Christian Surchi | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FLUG: http://www.firenze.linux.it | Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org
-> http://www.firenze.l
Hi all
With Berkeley DB 3.x now in unstable, I'm busy packaging Cyrus 2.x. I have
one major problem tho' - how best to handle upgrading from Cyrus 1.5/1.6 to
2.x.
First a bit of background - Cyrus is a POP/IMAP/NNTP server that stores
mail in its own spool hierarchy (currently /var/spool/cyrus)
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 11:52:53AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:45:17AM +0200, Davide Puricelli wrote:
> > lully.debian.org has:
> > ii g++2.95.3-5
>
> What about an up-to-date db.d.o/machines.cgi? It says that lully has potato and is
>down.
>
> Thank
this are my last errors, don't know how to fix them
also the programmer of the program doesn't know how to fix them, so someone
can giveme some hints, where the problem could be?
thx
chris
# lintian -i ktouch_1.0-8_i386.changes
warning: lintian's authors do not recommend running it with r
A package of mine requires the libstlport library. This library installs
as:
$ ls -l /usr/lib/libstlport*
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 Apr 3 12:54 /usr/lib/libstlport.a ->
libstlport_gcc.a
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 Apr 3 12:54 /usr/lib/libstlport.so ->
libstlpor
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:45:17AM +0200, Davide Puricelli wrote:
> lully.debian.org has:
> ii g++2.95.3-5
What about an up-to-date db.d.o/machines.cgi? It says that lully has potato and is
down.
Thanks.
--
Christian Surchi | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FLUG
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:07:37AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a package which the g++ in potato (2.95.2) is not able to
> compile correctly. Is there an Alpha box which has a recent (2.95.3 or
> 3.x) g++ (perhaps in a chroot) where I can try building the thing?
>
> The only
Hi,
I have a package which the g++ in potato (2.95.2) is not able to
compile correctly. Is there an Alpha box which has a recent (2.95.3 or
3.x) g++ (perhaps in a chroot) where I can try building the thing?
The only currently open Debian Alpha machine I know of is faure, and
it has the old gcc s
51 matches
Mail list logo
