Unidentified subject!

2001-04-11 Thread skdjfh
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Specifing library version.

2001-04-11 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 11:01:24PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > (Just make sure that you use an option like > -Wl,-soname,libfoo.so.2,-lc to gcc when you create the shared library.) When linking with gcc, you do not add in -lc. GCC will do that all by itself, internally (which is the whole reason

Re: GLIBC_2_2_3 ??

2001-04-11 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 01:24:32AM +0800, zhaoway wrote: > Hi, > > When tracking unstable, those packages (fileutils, libgtk1.2 etc) are > installed ok but when be running (like ls) they complained of lacking > a GLIBC 2_2_3 ... I then noticed the libc6 in unstable is 2.2.2, so my > question is ho

Re: Specifing library version.

2001-04-11 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 11:01:24PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > (Just make sure that you use an option like > -Wl,-soname,libfoo.so.2,-lc to gcc when you create the shared library.) When linking with gcc, you do not add in -lc. GCC will do that all by itself, internally (which is the whole reaso

Re: GLIBC_2_2_3 ??

2001-04-11 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 01:24:32AM +0800, zhaoway wrote: > Hi, > > When tracking unstable, those packages (fileutils, libgtk1.2 etc) are > installed ok but when be running (like ls) they complained of lacking > a GLIBC 2_2_3 ... I then noticed the libc6 in unstable is 2.2.2, so my > question is h

Re: Package with dinstall

2001-04-11 Thread James Troup
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 10:07:59AM +0200, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona wrote: > > James Troup writes: > > > "Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Just out of curiosity. Is there any package with dinstall? > > > > > >

Re: Specifing library version.

2001-04-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 09:35:36PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote: > > Hello, > > I have package which use shared library. I have problem with linking > binary from this package against certain version of shared library. > > For example I have source package foo of version 2.3.5 - this compile into >

Re: Package with dinstall

2001-04-11 Thread James Troup
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 10:07:59AM +0200, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona wrote: > > James Troup writes: > > > "Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Just out of curiosity. Is there any package with dinstall? > > > > >

Re: Advice needed on changing upstream source.

2001-04-11 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 10:12:13AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > > > > > I have a problem. The Webmin distribution consists of various modules. > > > It has periodic numbered releases. It also

Specifing library version.

2001-04-11 Thread Karel Gardas
Hello, I have package which use shared library. I have problem with linking binary from this package against certain version of shared library. For example I have source package foo of version 2.3.5 - this compile into binary foo and library libfoo. As I understand from Debian policy I have to c

Re: Specifing library version.

2001-04-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 09:35:36PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote: > > Hello, > > I have package which use shared library. I have problem with linking > binary from this package against certain version of shared library. > > For example I have source package foo of version 2.3.5 - this compile into

Re: Package with dinstall

2001-04-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 10:07:59AM +0200, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona wrote: > James Troup writes: > > "Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Just out of curiosity. Is there any package with dinstall? > > > > No. > > Thanks for the confirmation. Any special reason

Re: Advice needed on changing upstream source.

2001-04-11 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 10:12:13AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > > > > > I have a problem. The Webmin distribution consists of various modules. > > > It has periodic numbered releases. It also

GLIBC_2_2_3 ??

2001-04-11 Thread zhaoway
Hi, When tracking unstable, those packages (fileutils, libgtk1.2 etc) are installed ok but when be running (like ls) they complained of lacking a GLIBC 2_2_3 ... I then noticed the libc6 in unstable is 2.2.2, so my question is how these packages got this weird linkage? They're not build against un

Specifing library version.

2001-04-11 Thread Karel Gardas
Hello, I have package which use shared library. I have problem with linking binary from this package against certain version of shared library. For example I have source package foo of version 2.3.5 - this compile into binary foo and library libfoo. As I understand from Debian policy I have to

Re: Package with dinstall

2001-04-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 10:07:59AM +0200, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona wrote: > James Troup writes: > > "Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Just out of curiosity. Is there any package with dinstall? > > > > No. > > Thanks for the confirmation. Any special reaso

GLIBC_2_2_3 ??

2001-04-11 Thread zhaoway
Hi, When tracking unstable, those packages (fileutils, libgtk1.2 etc) are installed ok but when be running (like ls) they complained of lacking a GLIBC 2_2_3 ... I then noticed the libc6 in unstable is 2.2.2, so my question is how these packages got this weird linkage? They're not build against u

Re: Advice needed on changing upstream source.

2001-04-11 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > > > I have a problem. The Webmin distribution consists of various modules. > > It has periodic numbered releases. It also has unnumbered updates of > > individual modules between releases for bug fixes e

Re: Advice needed on changing upstream source.

2001-04-11 Thread Drew Parsons
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 12:38:39PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > > 3. add updates to the debianized source but not the orig.tar.gz > > > > I would handle it this way personally. Mucking with upstream source is never > a > good idea. > libc6 does does something like this, doesn't i

Re: Gnome mini-freeze...

2001-04-11 Thread Christian Marillat
"n" == ndez writes: >> >> Maybe compiling glade-gnome against bonobo ? >> >> Christian n> I'm new maintaining gnome packages (really maintaining all packages) and n> I don't fully understand you. n> If upstream maintainer haven't coded glade bonobo-aware compiling it n> against bonobo l

Re: Advice needed on changing upstream source.

2001-04-11 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:48:25PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have a problem. The Webmin distribution consists of various modules. > > It has periodic numbered releases. It also has unnumbered updates of > > individual modules between releases for bug fixes etc. What do I do? > > 0.

Re: m68k compilation, account needed ?

2001-04-11 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:23:50PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:37:30PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > I've fixed a porting bug on one of my package (ocaml-findlib). > > The bug caused a compilation failure on m68k architectures. > > Before uploading the new versi

Re: Advice needed on changing upstream source.

2001-04-11 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > > > I have a problem. The Webmin distribution consists of various modules. > > It has periodic numbered releases. It also has unnumbered updates of > > individual modules between releases for bug fixes

Re: Advice needed on changing upstream source.

2001-04-11 Thread Drew Parsons
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 12:38:39PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > > 3. add updates to the debianized source but not the orig.tar.gz > > > > I would handle it this way personally. Mucking with upstream source is never a > good idea. > libc6 does does something like this, doesn't it?

Re: Gnome mini-freeze...

2001-04-11 Thread Christian Marillat
"n" == ndez writes: >> >> Maybe compiling glade-gnome against bonobo ? >> >> Christian n> I'm new maintaining gnome packages (really maintaining all packages) and n> I don't fully understand you. n> If upstream maintainer haven't coded glade bonobo-aware compiling it n> against bonobo

Re: Gnome mini-freeze...

2001-04-11 Thread Luis Arocha Hernández
> > Maybe compiling glade-gnome against bonobo ? > > Christian I'm new maintaining gnome packages (really maintaining all packages) and I don't fully understand you. If upstream maintainer haven't coded glade bonobo-aware compiling it against bonobo libs will not do the job. Will it? Glade hom

Re: Advice needed on changing upstream source.

2001-04-11 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:48:25PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have a problem. The Webmin distribution consists of various modules. > > It has periodic numbered releases. It also has unnumbered updates of > > individual modules between releases for bug fixes etc. What do I do? > > 0.

Re: m68k compilation, account needed ?

2001-04-11 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:23:50PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:37:30PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > I've fixed a porting bug on one of my package (ocaml-findlib). > > The bug caused a compilation failure on m68k architectures. > > Before uploading the new vers

Re: Gnome mini-freeze...

2001-04-11 Thread Christian Marillat
"LA-" == Luis Arocha -data- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: LA-> Y el lunes 9 de abril, James LewisMoss escribió: >> Eric> GNOME Packages not up to 1.4 in unstable Eric> * glade* gnome-guile* gnome-pim gnome-print gnome-python* gtop Eric> imlib scrollkeeper >> >> No help needed for gnome-guile

Re: m68k compilation, account needed ?

2001-04-11 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:37:30PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I've fixed a porting bug on one of my package (ocaml-findlib). > The bug caused a compilation failure on m68k architectures. > Before uploading the new version and closing the bug I want to be sure > that the bug is fixed, but I

Re: Gnome mini-freeze...

2001-04-11 Thread Luis Arocha Hernández
> > Maybe compiling glade-gnome against bonobo ? > > Christian I'm new maintaining gnome packages (really maintaining all packages) and I don't fully understand you. If upstream maintainer haven't coded glade bonobo-aware compiling it against bonobo libs will not do the job. Will it? Glade ho

Re: Package with dinstall

2001-04-11 Thread Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona
James Troup writes: > "Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Just out of curiosity. Is there any package with dinstall? > > No. Thanks for the confirmation. Any special reason, or it is just that nobody did it? Saludos, Jesus. -- Jesus M. Gonzalez Barahona

Re: Gnome mini-freeze...

2001-04-11 Thread Christian Marillat
"LA-" == Luis Arocha -data- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: LA-> Y el lunes 9 de abril, James LewisMoss escribió: >> Eric> GNOME Packages not up to 1.4 in unstable Eric> * glade* gnome-guile* gnome-pim gnome-print gnome-python* gtop Eric> imlib scrollkeeper >> >> No help needed for gnome-guil

Re: m68k compilation, account needed ?

2001-04-11 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:37:30PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I've fixed a porting bug on one of my package (ocaml-findlib). > The bug caused a compilation failure on m68k architectures. > Before uploading the new version and closing the bug I want to be sure > that the bug is fixed, but I

Re: Package with dinstall

2001-04-11 Thread Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona
James Troup writes: > "Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Just out of curiosity. Is there any package with dinstall? > > No. Thanks for the confirmation. Any special reason, or it is just that nobody did it? Saludos, Jesus. -- Jesus M. Gonzalez Barahona

Re: Gnome mini-freeze...

2001-04-11 Thread Luis Arocha -data-
Y el lunes 9 de abril, James LewisMoss escribió: > > Eric> GNOME Packages not up to 1.4 in unstable > Eric> * glade* gnome-guile* gnome-pim gnome-print gnome-python* gtop > Eric> imlib scrollkeeper > > No help needed for gnome-guile. It'll be uploaded in a short bit just > waiting on an answ