Y el lunes 9 de abril, James LewisMoss escribió:
>
> Eric> GNOME Packages not up to 1.4 in unstable
> Eric> * glade* gnome-guile* gnome-pim gnome-print gnome-python* gtop
> Eric> imlib scrollkeeper
>
> No help needed for gnome-guile. It'll be uploaded in a short bit just
> waiting on an ans
"Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just out of curiosity. Is there any package with dinstall?
No.
> I'm wondering about using it for maintaining a local non-official
> repository... I've been looking for it and didn't found it
> anywhere...
http://ftp-master.debian.org/
Just out of curiosity. Is there any package with dinstall? I'm
wondering about using it for maintaining a local non-official
repository... I've been looking for it and didn't found it
anywhere...
Saludos,
Jesus.
--
Jesus M. Gonzalez Barahona| Grupo de Sistemas y Comunic
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> I have a problem. The Webmin distribution consists of various modules.
> It has periodic numbered releases. It also has unnumbered updates of
> individual modules between releases for bug fixes etc. What do I do?
>
> 1. Don't
"Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just out of curiosity. Is there any package with dinstall?
No.
> I'm wondering about using it for maintaining a local non-official
> repository... I've been looking for it and didn't found it
> anywhere...
http://ftp-master.debian.org/
Just out of curiosity. Is there any package with dinstall? I'm
wondering about using it for maintaining a local non-official
repository... I've been looking for it and didn't found it
anywhere...
Saludos,
Jesus.
--
Jesus M. Gonzalez Barahona| Grupo de Sistemas y Comuni
> I have a problem. The Webmin distribution consists of various modules.
> It has periodic numbered releases. It also has unnumbered updates of
> individual modules between releases for bug fixes etc. What do I do?
0. Complain to upstream and ask them to make an official patch-level
number f
>
> 3. add updates to the debianized source but not the orig.tar.gz
>
I would handle it this way personally. Mucking with upstream source is never a
good idea.
I have a problem. The Webmin distribution consists of various modules.
It has periodic numbered releases. It also has unnumbered updates of
individual modules between releases for bug fixes etc. What do I do?
1. Don't package the updates
2. add updates to both the debianized source and orig
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> I have a problem. The Webmin distribution consists of various modules.
> It has periodic numbered releases. It also has unnumbered updates of
> individual modules between releases for bug fixes etc. What do I do?
>
> 1. Don't
> I have a problem. The Webmin distribution consists of various modules.
> It has periodic numbered releases. It also has unnumbered updates of
> individual modules between releases for bug fixes etc. What do I do?
0. Complain to upstream and ask them to make an official patch-level
number
>
> 3. add updates to the debianized source but not the orig.tar.gz
>
I would handle it this way personally. Mucking with upstream source is never a
good idea.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a problem. The Webmin distribution consists of various modules.
It has periodic numbered releases. It also has unnumbered updates of
individual modules between releases for bug fixes etc. What do I do?
1. Don't package the updates
2. add updates to both the debianized source and ori
I've fixed a porting bug on one of my package (ocaml-findlib).
The bug caused a compilation failure on m68k architectures.
Before uploading the new version and closing the bug I want to be sure
that the bug is fixed, but I don't have a m68k machine on which try the
compilation.
May I request an ac
I've fixed a porting bug on one of my package (ocaml-findlib).
The bug caused a compilation failure on m68k architectures.
Before uploading the new version and closing the bug I want to be sure
that the bug is fixed, but I don't have a m68k machine on which try the
compilation.
May I request an a
> > ghex
GHex
by Michael T. Babcock - Saturday, March 24th 2001 21:12 EST
GHex is a simple binary editor, allowing the user to view and edit a binary
file in both hex and ascii with multiple
level undo/redo mechanism. It features find and replace
functions and conversion between binary,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 01:47:08AM -0500, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote:
> I've CC'd the debian-mentors list in hopes that some NMs or
> candidate NMs will volunteer. I offer to sponsor any uploads.
What about us existing maintainers, would it be possible for us to
volunteer? ;)
> ghex
> gnome-user-d
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 07:27:00PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> New packages are installed whenever James Troup gets around to installing
Er, or any of the other ftpmasters. (I admit I've been a bit slack recently,
but thats due to outside circumstances)
Mike.
--
Mich
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 06:01:08PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > I am cleaning up my packages, and one improvement
> > I want to add is that network daemon runs under its
> > own UID, not nobody (as it was until now).
> >
> > What is the best way of testing (and adding) a new username
> > in po
> > ghex
GHex
by Michael T. Babcock - Saturday, March 24th 2001 21:12 EST
GHex is a simple binary editor, allowing the user to view and edit a binary file in
both hex and ascii with multiple
level undo/redo mechanism. It features find and replace
functions and conversion between binary,
Radovan Garabik (2001-04-09 22:29:44 +0200) :
> What is the best way of testing (and adding) a new username in
> postinst?
,[ man adduser ]
|Add a system user
|If called with one non-option argument and the --system
|option, adduser will add a system user. If an user wi
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 01:47:08AM -0500, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote:
> I've CC'd the debian-mentors list in hopes that some NMs or
> candidate NMs will volunteer. I offer to sponsor any uploads.
What about us existing maintainers, would it be possible for us to
volunteer? ;)
> ghex
> gnome-user-
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 07:27:00PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> New packages are installed whenever James Troup gets around to installing
Er, or any of the other ftpmasters. (I admit I've been a bit slack recently,
but thats due to outside circumstances)
Mike.
--
Mic
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 06:01:08PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > I am cleaning up my packages, and one improvement
> > I want to add is that network daemon runs under its
> > own UID, not nobody (as it was until now).
> >
> > What is the best way of testing (and adding) a new username
> > in p
Radovan Garabik (2001-04-09 22:29:44 +0200) :
> What is the best way of testing (and adding) a new username in
> postinst?
,[ man adduser ]
|Add a system user
|If called with one non-option argument and the --system
|option, adduser will add a system user. If an user w
25 matches
Mail list logo
