On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Eric Dorland wrote:
> Actually it's not version 2.0 of Imlib... its a completely new library
> called Imlib 2... so the versioning is correct...
However, consider:
- Imlib2 is intended to supersede Imlib
- Imlib2 and Imlib were written by the same author
- There will never b
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:51:03AM +0100, Martin Albert wrote:
> Uhm, sorry - that question was silly. I haven't made up my mind wide
> enough, it seems.
>
> All that is left on this issue: Is it ok for postinst to output a
> message of minor priority without pause/prompting for a key?
If at
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Eric Dorland wrote:
> Actually it's not version 2.0 of Imlib... its a completely new library
> called Imlib 2... so the versioning is correct...
However, consider:
- Imlib2 is intended to supersede Imlib
- Imlib2 and Imlib were written by the same author
- There will never
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:34:26PM +0100, Martin Albert wrote:
> Hello, dear developers!
>
> libggi-target-fbdev.postinst checks /dev for framebuffer entries. If
> none are found, it offers to create them. Now i've received the
> following:
>
> [...]
> I was already wondering about a recent disc
Uhm, sorry - that question was silly. I haven't made up my mind wide
enough, it seems.
All that is left on this issue: Is it ok for postinst to output a
message of minor priority without pause/prompting for a key?
sorry, thanks, greetings martin
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Shane,
>
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Shane Wegner wrote:
>
> > I have packaged shared libraries in the past but am looking
> > for some help with this particular one. I am packaging
> > version 1.0.0 of dotconf and rather than naming it
> > libdotconf.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:34:26PM +0100, Martin Albert wrote:
> Hello, dear developers!
>
> libggi-target-fbdev.postinst checks /dev for framebuffer entries. If
> none are found, it offers to create them. Now i've received the
> following:
>
> [...]
> I was already wondering about a recent dis
Uhm, sorry - that question was silly. I haven't made up my mind wide
enough, it seems.
All that is left on this issue: Is it ok for postinst to output a
message of minor priority without pause/prompting for a key?
sorry, thanks, greetings martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Shane,
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Shane Wegner wrote:
> I have packaged shared libraries in the past but am looking
> for some help with this particular one. I am packaging
> version 1.0.0 of dotconf and rather than naming it
> libdotconf.so.1 as was done for 0.x (libdotconf.so.0) it's
> named libd
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Shane,
>
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Shane Wegner wrote:
>
> > I have packaged shared libraries in the past but am looking
> > for some help with this particular one. I am packaging
> > version 1.0.0 of dotconf and rather than naming it
> > libdotconf
On 21-Mar-2001 Shane Wegner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have packaged shared libraries in the past but am looking
> for some help with this particular one. I am packaging
> version 1.0.0 of dotconf and rather than naming it
> libdotconf.so.1 as was done for 0.x (libdotconf.so.0) it's
> named libdotconf-1
Hi,
I have packaged shared libraries in the past but am looking
for some help with this particular one. I am packaging
version 1.0.0 of dotconf and rather than naming it
libdotconf.so.1 as was done for 0.x (libdotconf.so.0) it's
named libdotconf-1.0.so.0. Now, I was under the impression
that one
Hi Shane,
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Shane Wegner wrote:
> I have packaged shared libraries in the past but am looking
> for some help with this particular one. I am packaging
> version 1.0.0 of dotconf and rather than naming it
> libdotconf.so.1 as was done for 0.x (libdotconf.so.0) it's
> named lib
I was wondering if there was a standard policy regarding libraries of
php routines; those dependent upon a given version of php and those
independent. Where do I place the files in a library package for
php4:
/usr/{share|lib}/
/usr/{share|lib}/php/
I intend on packaging the PHP4
On 21-Mar-2001 Shane Wegner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have packaged shared libraries in the past but am looking
> for some help with this particular one. I am packaging
> version 1.0.0 of dotconf and rather than naming it
> libdotconf.so.1 as was done for 0.x (libdotconf.so.0) it's
> named libdotconf-
Hi,
I have packaged shared libraries in the past but am looking
for some help with this particular one. I am packaging
version 1.0.0 of dotconf and rather than naming it
libdotconf.so.1 as was done for 0.x (libdotconf.so.0) it's
named libdotconf-1.0.so.0. Now, I was under the impression
that on
I was wondering if there was a standard policy regarding libraries of
php routines; those dependent upon a given version of php and those
independent. Where do I place the files in a library package for
php4:
/usr/{share|lib}/
/usr/{share|lib}/php/
I intend on packaging the PHP4
Hello, dear developers!
libggi-target-fbdev.postinst checks /dev for framebuffer entries. If
none are found, it offers to create them. Now i've received the
following:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libggi-target-fbdev
Version: 1:1.99.2.0b3.1-1
Severity: wishlist
When I upgraded the g
Hello, dear developers!
libggi-target-fbdev.postinst checks /dev for framebuffer entries. If
none are found, it offers to create them. Now i've received the
following:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libggi-target-fbdev
Version: 1:1.99.2.0b3.1-1
Severity: wishlist
When I upgraded the
19 matches
Mail list logo
