On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:42:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldb
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make[1]: *** [viewmol_] Error 1
> >
> []
> >
> > Is the absence of libdb.so in /usr/lib a bug in libc6-dev?
>
> No.
>
> > What is the proper way to sol
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldb
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [viewmol_] Error 1
>
[]
>
> Is the absence of libdb.so in /usr/lib a bug in libc6-dev?
No.
> What is the proper way to solve this question?
apt-get install libdb2-dev
Eric
A program (viewmol) I'm trying to package has some problems finding some db
library. It doesn't specify this library explicitly, the makefile just says
viewmol_: $(OBJ) ; cc -o viewmol $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJ) $(LIBRARY) $(LIBS)
LIBS is not defined in the makefile, it just has the default values for ma
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:42:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldb
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make[1]: *** [viewmol_] Error 1
> >
> []
> >
> > Is the absence of libdb.so in /usr/lib a bug in libc6-dev?
>
> No.
>
> > What is the proper way to so
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldb
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [viewmol_] Error 1
>
[]
>
> Is the absence of libdb.so in /usr/lib a bug in libc6-dev?
No.
> What is the proper way to solve this question?
apt-get install libdb2-dev
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
A program (viewmol) I'm trying to package has some problems finding some db
library. It doesn't specify this library explicitly, the makefile just says
viewmol_: $(OBJ) ; cc -o viewmol $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJ) $(LIBRARY) $(LIBS)
LIBS is not defined in the makefile, it just has the default values for m
Hi everybody,
when I try to build any debian package the ${shlibs:Depends} statement
in control file seems not to work. The place in "Depends:" line, where the
xlib,... should be listed, is free. dh_shlibdepends and dh_gencontrol are
present in "rules" file. I'm working with debian potato. Tryin
Hello,
[Sorry for the delay, my Internet connection was dead all last night.]
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 09:51:23AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, adding a copy of the license isn't so hard.
It's not that, it just seems cleaner if I can just refer to the common
one. I know, cl
Hi everybody,
when I try to build any debian package the ${shlibs:Depends} statement
in control file seems not to work. The place in "Depends:" line, where the
xlib,... should be listed, is free. dh_shlibdepends and dh_gencontrol are
present in "rules" file. I'm working with debian potato. Tryin
Hello,
[Sorry for the delay, my Internet connection was dead all last night.]
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 09:51:23AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, adding a copy of the license isn't so hard.
It's not that, it just seems cleaner if I can just refer to the common
one. I know, c
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 03:59:44PM +0100, Javier Vi?uales Guti?rrez wrote:
> Hello, I'd been talking about C-Kermit license with the HPTalx upstream
> mantainer and I explained him, that C-Kermit license is a non-free license
> from a DFSG point of view because the Clause (A), don't let modificatio
Hello, I'd been talking about C-Kermit license with the HPTalx upstream
mantainer and I explained him, that C-Kermit license is a non-free license
from a DFSG point of view because the Clause (A), don't let modification of
the source code without the consent of the Kermit Project (Columbia
Universi
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 03:59:44PM +0100, Javier Vi?uales Guti?rrez wrote:
> Hello, I'd been talking about C-Kermit license with the HPTalx upstream
> mantainer and I explained him, that C-Kermit license is a non-free license
> from a DFSG point of view because the Clause (A), don't let modificati
Hello, I'd been talking about C-Kermit license with the HPTalx upstream
mantainer and I explained him, that C-Kermit license is a non-free license
from a DFSG point of view because the Clause (A), don't let modification of
the source code without the consent of the Kermit Project (Columbia
Univers
14 matches
Mail list logo
