Hello,
[Sorry for the delay, my Internet connection was dead all last night.]
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 09:51:23AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, adding a copy of the license isn't so hard.
It's not that, it just seems cleaner if I can just refer to the common
one. I know, cleaner but wrong. :-)
A preliminary version of the package (scanssh) is in
<http://people.debian.org/~rweber/prelim/>. It will be uploaded as soon as
I can get it tested on a real woody box.
> FWIW, there was talk of doing this for *all* packages, regardless of
> any license changes, but I don't recall what came of it. See the thread
> starting here:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy-0011/msg00235.html
Hmmmm, I seem to remember that. Some of it probably spilled over to
debian-devel. Thanks.
Rene
--
+--- (Rene Weber is <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) ---+
| Nothing is worse for people who are busy than visits from |
| people who are not. |
+--- E-Mail Policy & web page: <http://satori.home.dhs.org/~rweber/> ---+
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]