Re: Two-part initialization?

2001-03-08 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, 08 Mar 2001 10:09:51 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I can't see any problem with that. That's probably the best solution >suggested so far. I implemented it this way. Thanks for your comments, I really appreciate them. Greetings Marc -- -- !! No co

Re: Two-part initialization?

2001-03-08 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, 08 Mar 2001 10:09:51 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I can't see any problem with that. That's probably the best solution >suggested so far. I implemented it this way. Thanks for your comments, I really appreciate them. Greetings Marc -- -- !! No c

Re: Two-part initialization?

2001-03-08 Thread sharkey
> Hm, how about having /etc/init.d/$package which supports the actions > that are required by the sysvinit "API" and one additional target > "pre-start". And then /etc/init.d/${package}-pre which invokes > /etc/init.d/$package pre-start if invoked with "start", and does noop > on all other actions?

Re: BSD license issues

2001-03-08 Thread sharkey
> > However, it _is_ different, and so you must include a copy of it in the > > copyright file. > > Bah. I was hoping to avoid that conclusion, although I think you are > correct. :-) Well, adding a copy of the license isn't so hard. FWIW, there was talk of doing this for *all* packages, r

Re: Two-part initialization?

2001-03-08 Thread sharkey
> Hm, how about having /etc/init.d/$package which supports the actions > that are required by the sysvinit "API" and one additional target > "pre-start". And then /etc/init.d/${package}-pre which invokes > /etc/init.d/$package pre-start if invoked with "start", and does noop > on all other actions

Re: BSD license issues

2001-03-08 Thread sharkey
> > However, it _is_ different, and so you must include a copy of it in the > > copyright file. > > Bah. I was hoping to avoid that conclusion, although I think you are > correct. :-) Well, adding a copy of the license isn't so hard. FWIW, there was talk of doing this for *all* packages,

Re: BSD license issues

2001-03-08 Thread Rene Weber
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:14:03PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > As you can see, these changes simply replace references to the university and > its regents with references to the author of the program. The terms of the > license remain the same, and so it is equally free. Agreed. > However

Re: BSD license issues

2001-03-08 Thread Rene Weber
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:14:03PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > As you can see, these changes simply replace references to the university and > its regents with references to the author of the program. The terms of the > license remain the same, and so it is equally free. Agreed. > Howeve