On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:38:15AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 08:13:57AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > You should always be able to backport a patch. If not, I'm sorry, but that
> > this should be one quality of a Debian maintainer, you lack something...
> Martin
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 05:02:16PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Francis Irving wrote:
> > Basically, when dh_shlibdeps runs from within dpkg-buildpackage
> > -rfakeroot it doesn't generate the file debian/substvars. If
> > I run it at the command line from the same directory, it
> > correctly generat
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:38:15AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 08:13:57AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > You should always be able to backport a patch. If not, I'm sorry, but that
> > this should be one quality of a Debian maintainer, you lack something...
> Marti
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 05:02:16PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Francis Irving wrote:
> > Basically, when dh_shlibdeps runs from within dpkg-buildpackage
> > -rfakeroot it doesn't generate the file debian/substvars. If
> > I run it at the command line from the same directory, it
> > correctly genera
Chris Hanson wrote:
> I don't know the design decisions that went into debconf, but what I
> am suggesting looks consistent with the design document in
> "/usr/share/doc/debconf/specification.txt.gz". In that document,
> debconf looks very much like a database, and it seems strange that I
> should
On 20010122T173956+0100, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> Now what is the refernce archive? I'm reading in the
> "developers-reference" that it's ftp-master.debian.org, but it does not
> seem to contain the archive, at least not through anonymous access...
ftp-master.debian.org:/org/ftp.debian.org/
A user reported to me that he can't find libstl for unstable. I checked
and it was available on my mirror and I told him so thinking maybe it was
a problem with pools and the package being somewhere in the middle of a
transfer. Upon which he later reported that it even wasn't available on
the main
Chris Hanson wrote:
> I don't know the design decisions that went into debconf, but what I
> am suggesting looks consistent with the design document in
> "/usr/share/doc/debconf/specification.txt.gz". In that document,
> debconf looks very much like a database, and it seems strange that I
> shoul
On 20010122T173956+0100, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> Now what is the refernce archive? I'm reading in the
> "developers-reference" that it's ftp-master.debian.org, but it does not
> seem to contain the archive, at least not through anonymous access...
ftp-master.debian.org:/org/ftp.debian.org
A user reported to me that he can't find libstl for unstable. I checked
and it was available on my mirror and I told him so thinking maybe it was
a problem with pools and the package being somewhere in the middle of a
transfer. Upon which he later reported that it even wasn't available on
the main
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 10:24:43 -0200
From: Henrique M Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> That doesn't sound like a reason; it sounds more like an axiom. Care
It is indeed, but if you do need a reason, here´s one: Should an admin need
to migrate the system´s configuration, he must NOT
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 10:24:43 -0200
From: Henrique M Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> That doesn't sound like a reason; it sounds more like an axiom. Care
It is indeed, but if you do need a reason, here´s one: Should an admin need
to migrate the system´s configuration, he must NO
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Chris Hanson wrote:
>Chris Hanson wrote:
>> Any reason not to do this?
>
>Debconf is Not a Registry (TM)
I second that. Do *NOT* use Debconf as a registry. That is EVIL. Do not do
it.
> That doesn't sound like a reason; it sounds more like an axiom. Care
It is
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know I want a xgospel_1.12-4.deb and xgospel_1.12-4.dsc
>
> I have been employed as a unix sysadmin and much more recently, perl
> programmer (and even more recently, my first C project)
>
> And I have time.
Well, download the required packages t
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 03:49:22AM -0600, Scott Dier wrote:
> * Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010122 02:38]:
> > > You should always be able to backport a patch. If not, I'm sorry, but
> > > that
> > > this should be one quality of a Debian maintainer, you lack something...
> > Martin? I
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Chris Hanson wrote:
>Chris Hanson wrote:
>> Any reason not to do this?
>
>Debconf is Not a Registry (TM)
I second that. Do *NOT* use Debconf as a registry. That is EVIL. Do not do
it.
> That doesn't sound like a reason; it sounds more like an axiom. Care
It is
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know I want a xgospel_1.12-4.deb and xgospel_1.12-4.dsc
>
> I have been employed as a unix sysadmin and much more recently, perl
> programmer (and even more recently, my first C project)
>
> And I have time.
Well, download the required packages
* Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010122 02:38]:
> > You should always be able to backport a patch. If not, I'm sorry, but that
> > this should be one quality of a Debian maintainer, you lack something...
> Martin? It it the quality of a Debian maintainer to find the right line(s) in
> a 10
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:27:59PM +0100, Sander Smeenk (CistroN Medewerker)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you all could've read I just adopted the micq package and i'm
> very happy with that since I use micq very often...
>
> I have a few questions because I am still a little newbie at this :]
Next time
Hi
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 08:13:57AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > (and not at least officially announced as stable) version 3.23.31 for
> > potato.
>
> You should always be able to backport a patch. If not, I'm sorry, but that
> this should be one quality of a Debian maintainer, you lack s
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 03:49:22AM -0600, Scott Dier wrote:
> * Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010122 02:38]:
> > > You should always be able to backport a patch. If not, I'm sorry, but that
> > > this should be one quality of a Debian maintainer, you lack something...
> > Martin? It it t
* Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010122 02:38]:
> > You should always be able to backport a patch. If not, I'm sorry, but that
> > this should be one quality of a Debian maintainer, you lack something...
> Martin? It it the quality of a Debian maintainer to find the right line(s) in
> a 1
Christian Hammers wrote:
> Hi
>
> As MySQL has a bad security problem and is accordingly to a @mysql.com person
> no longer supported in potato's version my only chance is to build the latest
What do you want to express? The security problem is no longer supported
in the potato version? Fine. :
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:27:59PM +0100, Sander Smeenk (CistroN Medewerker) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you all could've read I just adopted the micq package and i'm
> very happy with that since I use micq very often...
>
> I have a few questions because I am still a little newbie at this :]
Next time
Hi
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 08:13:57AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > (and not at least officially announced as stable) version 3.23.31 for potato.
>
> You should always be able to backport a patch. If not, I'm sorry, but that
> this should be one quality of a Debian maintainer, you lack somet
25 matches
Mail list logo
