Hi all,
There is anyone who could sponsor me on openvrml upload?
I'm waiting DAM process from june and my AM wmono is unavaible from 12 october
so I've noone.
There's anyone.
bye and thank you in advance.
P.S. http://openvrml.sourceforge.net
--
Maurizio Boriani
General Services (InterN
Hi all,
There is anyone who could sponsor me on openvrml upload?
I'm waiting DAM process from june and my AM wmono is unavaible from 12 october so I've
noone.
There's anyone.
bye and thank you in advance.
P.S. http://openvrml.sourceforge.net
--
Maurizio Boriani
General Services (Inter
On 22-Dec-2000 Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if you test my linkchecker .deb package:
> I just noticed that lintian gives the following warnings on my 1.2.12
> package of LinkChecker:
> W: linkchecker: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
> W: linkchecker: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
On 22-Dec-2000 Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if you test my linkchecker .deb package:
> I just noticed that lintian gives the following warnings on my 1.2.12
> package of LinkChecker:
> W: linkchecker: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
> W: linkchecker: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
>
On Friday 22 December 2000 20:11, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Mariusz,
Hi,
> I recently ran into this problem myself. Looking at the source to
> dpkg-shlibdeps, this appears to be a bug: what happens is that
> dpkg-shlibdeps uses ldd to find all the libraries that your binary 'qub' is
> linked ag
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote:
> The binary package 'qub' includes the application 'qub' and the shared
> library 'libfunUtil'.
> I have debian/shlibs.local with 'libfunUtil 0' but dpkg-shlibdeps says:
> 'warning: could not find path for libfunUtil.so.0'. I have also tried with
>
The binary package 'qub' includes the application 'qub' and the shared
library 'libfunUtil'.
I have debian/shlibs.local with 'libfunUtil 0' but dpkg-shlibdeps says:
'warning: could not find path for libfunUtil.so.0'. I have also tried with
'libfunUtil 0 qub' in shlibs.local with the same warning.
I am trying to package soaplib, a python SOAP implementation. I copy the lone
soaplib.py to usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/soaplib. My postinst runs
compileall.py (I copied python-xml).
When I try to 'import soaplib' in python, I get an error:
ImportError: No module named soaplib
anyone know
On Friday 22 December 2000 20:11, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Mariusz,
Hi,
> I recently ran into this problem myself. Looking at the source to
> dpkg-shlibdeps, this appears to be a bug: what happens is that
> dpkg-shlibdeps uses ldd to find all the libraries that your binary 'qub' is
> linked a
Hi,
if you test my linkchecker .deb package:
I just noticed that lintian gives the following warnings on my 1.2.12
package of LinkChecker:
W: linkchecker: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
W: linkchecker: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
This is a lintian (or debconf) bug because I see the fol
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote:
> The binary package 'qub' includes the application 'qub' and the shared
> library 'libfunUtil'.
> I have debian/shlibs.local with 'libfunUtil 0' but dpkg-shlibdeps says:
> 'warning: could not find path for libfunUtil.so.0'. I have also tried with
The binary package 'qub' includes the application 'qub' and the shared
library 'libfunUtil'.
I have debian/shlibs.local with 'libfunUtil 0' but dpkg-shlibdeps says:
'warning: could not find path for libfunUtil.so.0'. I have also tried with
'libfunUtil 0 qub' in shlibs.local with the same warning
Hello,
I filed an ITP some days ago for LinkChecker and I need a sponsor to
upload this package.
Here is the description:
LinkChecker -- check HTML pages for broken links
Current version: 1.2.12
License: GPL
URL: http://linkchecker.sourceforge.net/
Download: ftp://linkchecker.sourceforge.net/pub/
I am trying to package soaplib, a python SOAP implementation. I copy the lone
soaplib.py to usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/soaplib. My postinst runs
compileall.py (I copied python-xml).
When I try to 'import soaplib' in python, I get an error:
ImportError: No module named soaplib
anyone know
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 04:53:35PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
>
> I too think that the spam level is annoyingly high. If anyone
> really feels able to do it and also wants to do it (ie, someone
> who has access to the list server(s)), then I'll dig out a list
> of measures that I find is effect
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 12:43:03AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > [crap clipped]
> Hmm, the debian lists get quite a lot of spam lately. Is there anything
> that can be done about this?
(Note: So far I read some 10 answers which gives me a 10-fold
increase in spam and noise over the ori
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 03:25:54PM +0100, Cord Beermann wrote:
> Hi.
ciao
>
> I've build a package which includes two binaries (jove, an editor with
> a X-Frontend). Now i've found out that i can't build the X-Frontend on
> the Hurd yet (missing xview-dev).
>
> How can i produce a source-packag
On 00-12-21 Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> 2. Pools do NOT allow you to fix a broken .orig.tar.gz upload. Once a
> .orig.tar.gz is installed, it stays... and the only means of fixing a broken
> one is to bump up the upstream version. This also means you can do a full
> source upload only *once* for a
Hi,
if you test my linkchecker .deb package:
I just noticed that lintian gives the following warnings on my 1.2.12
package of LinkChecker:
W: linkchecker: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
W: linkchecker: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
This is a lintian (or debconf) bug because I see the fo
Hi.
I've build a package which includes two binaries (jove, an editor with
a X-Frontend). Now i've found out that i can't build the X-Frontend on
the Hurd yet (missing xview-dev).
How can i produce a source-package, that simply builds only the
editor on the hurd, and builds both packages on the
Hello,
I filed an ITP some days ago for LinkChecker and I need a sponsor to
upload this package.
Here is the description:
LinkChecker -- check HTML pages for broken links
Current version: 1.2.12
License: GPL
URL: http://linkchecker.sourceforge.net/
Download: ftp://linkchecker.sourceforge.net/pub
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 04:53:35PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
>
> I too think that the spam level is annoyingly high. If anyone
> really feels able to do it and also wants to do it (ie, someone
> who has access to the list server(s)), then I'll dig out a list
> of measures that I find is effec
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 12:43:03AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > [crap clipped]
> Hmm, the debian lists get quite a lot of spam lately. Is there anything
> that can be done about this?
(Note: So far I read some 10 answers which gives me a 10-fold
increase in spam and noise over the or
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 03:25:54PM +0100, Cord Beermann wrote:
> Hi.
ciao
>
> I've build a package which includes two binaries (jove, an editor with
> a X-Frontend). Now i've found out that i can't build the X-Frontend on
> the Hurd yet (missing xview-dev).
>
> How can i produce a source-packa
On 00-12-21 Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> 2. Pools do NOT allow you to fix a broken .orig.tar.gz upload. Once a
> .orig.tar.gz is installed, it stays... and the only means of fixing a broken
> one is to bump up the upstream version. This also means you can do a full
> source upload only *once* for
Hi.
I've build a package which includes two binaries (jove, an editor with
a X-Frontend). Now i've found out that i can't build the X-Frontend on
the Hurd yet (missing xview-dev).
How can i produce a source-package, that simply builds only the
editor on the hurd, and builds both packages on the
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 02:34:29AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> The thing I want to know is, that it is a "libpyecasound.so",
> and it doesn't have the numbers after it.
>
it really seems to be a plug-in. please look for headers files and other
development files. if they miss it is not a shar
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 02:34:29AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> The thing I want to know is, that it is a "libpyecasound.so",
> and it doesn't have the numbers after it.
>
it really seems to be a plug-in. please look for headers files and other
development files. if they miss it is not a sha
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 08:58:24PM -0200, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> 2. Pools do NOT allow you to fix a broken .orig.tar.gz upload. Once a
> .orig.tar.gz is installed, it stays... and the only means of fixing a broken
> one is to bump up the upstream version. This also means you can do a full
> s
29 matches
Mail list logo
