* Matt Zimmerman
| On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 08:50:10PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|
| > I am building fortunes-bofh-excuses - just a couple of data files for
| > fortune.
|
| Is there any reason why they shouldn't be included in fortune proper?
That they are distributed separately and that I
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 08:50:10PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I am building fortunes-bofh-excuses - just a couple of data files for
> fortune.
Is there any reason why they shouldn't be included in fortune proper?
--
- mdz
* Matt Zimmerman
| On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 08:50:10PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|
| > I am building fortunes-bofh-excuses - just a couple of data files for
| > fortune.
|
| Is there any reason why they shouldn't be included in fortune proper?
That they are distributed separately and that
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 08:50:10PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I am building fortunes-bofh-excuses - just a couple of data files for
> fortune.
Is there any reason why they shouldn't be included in fortune proper?
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 07:26:31PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
>
> My sourcenav package was sponsored by Murat Demirten but it looks
> like he has mistakenly registered himself as the maintainer. Bug
> reports go to him. My previously sponsored packages had the maintainer
> field indicating m
on Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 08:14:00AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 08:14:50AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > Try doing a Google search trying to identify issues with that
> > oh-so-distinctively named MSFT blasphemy called, um, "Word". Minor
> >
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 07:26:31PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
>
> My sourcenav package was sponsored by Murat Demirten but it looks
> like he has mistakenly registered himself as the maintainer. Bug
> reports go to him. My previously sponsored packages had the maintainer
> field indicating
* Adrian Bunk
| On 20 Dec 2000, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|
| >...
| > It has a Architecture: all in the control file. However, building
| > with dpkg-buildpackage generates a
| > fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_i386.changes, not
| > fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_all.changes as I would expect.
| >
| > I
On 20 Dec 2000, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>...
> It has a Architecture: all in the control file. However, building
> with dpkg-buildpackage generates a
> fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_i386.changes, not
> fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_all.changes as I would expect.
>
> Is it supposed to be that way? I c
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 08:14:50AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> Try doing a Google search trying to identify issues with that
> oh-so-distinctively named MSFT blasphemy called, um, "Word". Minor
> variants -- WordPerfect, AbiWord, WordStar, fare much better. Note that
> some other MS prod
on Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 08:14:00AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 08:14:50AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Try doing a Google search trying to identify issues with that
> > oh-so-distinctively named MSFT blasphemy called, um, "Word". Minor
> > var
* Adrian Bunk
| On 20 Dec 2000, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|
| >...
| > It has a Architecture: all in the control file. However, building
| > with dpkg-buildpackage generates a
| > fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_i386.changes, not
| > fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_all.changes as I would expect.
| >
| >
I am building fortunes-bofh-excuses - just a couple of data files for
fortune.
It has a Architecture: all in the control file. However, building
with dpkg-buildpackage generates a
fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_i386.changes, not
fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_all.changes as I would expect.
Is it supp
On 20 Dec 2000, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>...
> It has a Architecture: all in the control file. However, building
> with dpkg-buildpackage generates a
> fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_i386.changes, not
> fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_all.changes as I would expect.
>
> Is it supposed to be that way? I
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 08:14:50AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Try doing a Google search trying to identify issues with that
> oh-so-distinctively named MSFT blasphemy called, um, "Word". Minor
> variants -- WordPerfect, AbiWord, WordStar, fare much better. Note that
> some other MS produc
"MZ" == Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> E: gnome-panel-data: debian-changelog-file-missing
>>
>> This is normal ?
MZ> Lintian has no way to check whether the changelog is valid, since it isn't
in
MZ> the package. It seems to have a special check for packages which sym
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:57:25PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> "S'P" == Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> I've another problem with lintian.
>
> Lintian complain if I make a symlink with changelog.Debian like :
>
> /usr/share/doc/gnome-panel-data/changel
I am building fortunes-bofh-excuses - just a couple of data files for
fortune.
It has a Architecture: all in the control file. However, building
with dpkg-buildpackage generates a
fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_i386.changes, not
fortunes-bofh-excuses_1.1-1_all.changes as I would expect.
Is it sup
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 07:26:31PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> My sourcenav package was sponsored by Murat Demirten but it looks
> like he has mistakenly registered himself as the maintainer. Bug
> reports go to him. My previously sponsored packages had the maintainer
> field indicating me.
My sourcenav package was sponsored by Murat Demirten but it looks
like he has mistakenly registered himself as the maintainer. Bug
reports go to him. My previously sponsored packages had the maintainer
field indicating me. What is the proper way to fix this?
Thanks,
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp.
"S'P" == Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
I've another problem with lintian.
Lintian complain if I make a symlink with changelog.Debian like :
/usr/share/doc/gnome-panel-data/changelog.Debian.gz ->
../gnome-panel/changelog.Debian.gz
E: gnome-panel-data: debian-change
"S'P" == Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>>> if [ -d /usr/doc -a ! -e /usr/doc/sawfish-lisp-source -a -d
>>> /usr/share/doc/sawfish-lisp-source ]; then
>> [...]
>>
>> I think it's choking because of source, the check m/\bsource\b/ is matching
>> because `-' seems to be
on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 06:31:12PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 04:36:31PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > OK, so call it water-demo or waterdemo or something along those lines.
> > > I looked through the
"MZ" == Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> E: gnome-panel-data: debian-changelog-file-missing
>>
>> This is normal ?
MZ> Lintian has no way to check whether the changelog is valid, since it isn't in
MZ> the package. It seems to have a special check for packages which sym
On 20-Dec-2000 Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 01:39:13PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> I've this strange output with lintian and I see nothing wrong in these
>> scripts (debhelper scripts)
>>
>> W: sawfish-lisp-source: possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script postinst:4
> [...]
>
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:57:25PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> "S'P" == Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> I've another problem with lintian.
>
> Lintian complain if I make a symlink with changelog.Debian like :
>
> /usr/share/doc/gnome-panel-data/change
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 07:26:31PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> My sourcenav package was sponsored by Murat Demirten but it looks
> like he has mistakenly registered himself as the maintainer. Bug
> reports go to him. My previously sponsored packages had the maintainer
> field indicating me.
My sourcenav package was sponsored by Murat Demirten but it looks
like he has mistakenly registered himself as the maintainer. Bug
reports go to him. My previously sponsored packages had the maintainer
field indicating me. What is the proper way to fix this?
Thanks,
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp.
"S'P" == Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
I've another problem with lintian.
Lintian complain if I make a symlink with changelog.Debian like :
/usr/share/doc/gnome-panel-data/changelog.Debian.gz ->
../gnome-panel/changelog.Debian.gz
E: gnome-panel-data: debian-chang
"S'P" == Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>>> if [ -d /usr/doc -a ! -e /usr/doc/sawfish-lisp-source -a -d
>>> /usr/share/doc/sawfish-lisp-source ]; then
>> [...]
>>
>> I think it's choking because of source, the check m/\bsource\b/ is matching
>> because `-' seems to b
on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 06:31:12PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 04:36:31PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > OK, so call it water-demo or waterdemo or something along those lines.
> > > I looked through the
On 20-Dec-2000 Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 01:39:13PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> I've this strange output with lintian and I see nothing wrong in these
>> scripts (debhelper scripts)
>>
>> W: sawfish-lisp-source: possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script postinst:4
> [...]
now one of my debian servers reports to me this:
---
Subject:
Cronroot test -e /usr/sbin/anacron || run-parts --report
/etc/cron.daily
/bin/sh: root: command not found
/etc/cron.daily/modutils:
rm: cannot remove `/var/log/ksymoops/20001216062615.ksyms': No such file
or
now one of my debian servers reports to me this:
---
Subject:
Cronroot test -e /usr/sbin/anacron || run-parts --report
/etc/cron.daily
/bin/sh: root: command not found
/etc/cron.daily/modutils:
rm: cannot remove `/var/log/ksymoops/20001216062615.ksyms': No such file
or
34 matches
Mail list logo
