i don't have woody yet; didn't know they existed. i'll upgrade one of my
computers.
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:29:36PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > dear all,
> >
> > i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
> >
> > >=libsd
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:29:36PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> dear all,
>
> i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
>
> >=libsdl1.0 which debian provides
> sdl_imagea library which debian doesn't provide
> sdl_mixera library which debian doesn't provide
Whats wrong
Howdy,
Peter Jay Salzman recently wrote:
> i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
> >=libsdl1.0 which debian provides
> sdl_image a library which debian doesn't provide
> sdl_mixer a library which debian doesn't provide
Although the image and mixer libraries are not in potato, the
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> dear all,
>
> i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
>
> >=libsdl1.0 which debian provides
> sdl_imagea library which debian doesn't provide
> sdl_mixera library which debian doesn't provide
>
> currently, the only way to g
On 06-Nov-2000 Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> dear all,
>
> i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
>
>>=libsdl1.0 which debian provides
> sdl_imagea library which debian doesn't provide
> sdl_mixera library which debian doesn't provide
>
> currently, the only way to get sdl_
dear all,
i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
>=libsdl1.0 which debian provides
sdl_imagea library which debian doesn't provide
sdl_mixera library which debian doesn't provide
currently, the only way to get sdl_image and sdl_mixer on a debian system is
to compile it fr
i don't have woody yet; didn't know they existed. i'll upgrade one of my
computers.
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:29:36PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > dear all,
> >
> > i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
> >
> > >=libs
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:29:36PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> dear all,
>
> i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
>
> >=libsdl1.0 which debian provides
> sdl_imagea library which debian doesn't provide
> sdl_mixera library which debian doesn't provide
Whats wrong
>
> I have been looking at packages, and I am wondering where those
> gtk-config/gnome-config etc. scripts should go.
>
> Logically thinking they belong to *-dev packages, or if needed at runtime,
> in lib* packages.
>
> However some people put it in *-runtime package, and regarding the policy
Howdy,
Peter Jay Salzman recently wrote:
> i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
> >=libsdl1.0 which debian provides
> sdl_image a library which debian doesn't provide
> sdl_mixer a library which debian doesn't provide
Although the image and mixer libraries are not in potato, th
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> dear all,
>
> i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
>
> >=libsdl1.0 which debian provides
> sdl_imagea library which debian doesn't provide
> sdl_mixera library which debian doesn't provide
>
> currently, the only way to
On 06-Nov-2000 Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> dear all,
>
> i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
>
>>=libsdl1.0 which debian provides
> sdl_imagea library which debian doesn't provide
> sdl_mixera library which debian doesn't provide
>
> currently, the only way to get sdl
dear all,
i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
>=libsdl1.0 which debian provides
sdl_imagea library which debian doesn't provide
sdl_mixera library which debian doesn't provide
currently, the only way to get sdl_image and sdl_mixer on a debian system is
to compile it f
>
> I have been looking at packages, and I am wondering where those
> gtk-config/gnome-config etc. scripts should go.
>
> Logically thinking they belong to *-dev packages, or if needed at runtime,
> in lib* packages.
>
> However some people put it in *-runtime package, and regarding the policy
Hello world,
I have been looking at packages, and I am wondering where those
gtk-config/gnome-config etc. scripts should go.
Logically thinking they belong to *-dev packages, or if needed at runtime,
in lib* packages.
However some people put it in *-runtime package, and regarding the policy
i
Hello world,
I have been looking at packages, and I am wondering where those
gtk-config/gnome-config etc. scripts should go.
Logically thinking they belong to *-dev packages, or if needed at runtime,
in lib* packages.
However some people put it in *-runtime package, and regarding the policy
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:16:25PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am patient and I am not worry.
> But I think you should first send me above your message privately only
> before blaming me in such public way.
So that everybody else who is annoyed by the priority also send you a
private ma
>Hi Mariusz,
Hi Stefan,
>I see that you are using "Priority: urgent", "Importance: High"
>headers all the time, and repeating your sponsor requests 2-3 times
>within a short time-period.
This is not true. I request sponsorship for qtcups twice and
for kups - once. I did second request for qtcup
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:16:25PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am patient and I am not worry.
> But I think you should first send me above your message privately only
> before blaming me in such public way.
So that everybody else who is annoyed by the priority also send you a
private m
Hi Mariusz,
I see that you are using "Priority: urgent", "Importance: High"
headers all the time, and repeating your sponsor requests 2-3 times
within a short time-period.
I think it is a good netiquette not to abuse the priority fields,
and searching through the debian-devel list I found that yo
>Hi Mariusz,
Hi Stefan,
>I see that you are using "Priority: urgent", "Importance: High"
>headers all the time, and repeating your sponsor requests 2-3 times
>within a short time-period.
This is not true. I request sponsorship for qtcups twice and
for kups - once. I did second request
Hi Mariusz,
I see that you are using "Priority: urgent", "Importance: High"
headers all the time, and repeating your sponsor requests 2-3 times
within a short time-period.
I think it is a good netiquette not to abuse the priority fields,
and searching through the debian-devel list I found that y
22 matches
Mail list logo
