>Hi Mariusz, Hi Stefan,
>I see that you are using "Priority: urgent", "Importance: High" >headers all the time, and repeating your sponsor requests 2-3 times >within a short time-period. This is not true. I request sponsorship for qtcups twice and for kups - once. I did second request for qtcups because I provided additional information about my web page and about my new e-mail account. I am sorry if I wasted your time. >I think it is a good netiquette not to abuse the priority fields, >and searching through the debian-devel list I found that you've >used high-importance for almost half of your letters to the list, >while I've found almost none of the other mails to carry these flags. >(and if they did, they were marked 'Normal'). O.K. Maybe. I am sorry. If you maintain such statitistics you are right probably. Previously I used Outlook (in work) and it was preconfigured with such stupid flags. Now I use kmail from my private account and everything is under control >Please see yourself in a greater perspective (i.e. "is my message >really important/urgent") and have some patience (I know it's hard, >I got my sponsor after a long time, and has still not gotten my >ID checked by my A-M after two months assignment). I am patient and I am not worry. But I think you should first send me above your message privately only before blaming me in such public way. This is not a good example of netiquette for many young people (not like me) which want to join Debian developers. I am sorry I wasted your time again. Best Regards, Mariusz
