On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Franklin Belew wrote:
> > >At least /I/ got a few xzyz is INSTALLED|REJECTED|NEW mails.
> >
> The person who signs the changes file gets mailed
> My sponsor when I was in the queue would forward me the mails from
> dinstall/ftp-master, yours probably did this as well
Hmm. No
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Franklin Belew wrote:
> > >At least /I/ got a few xzyz is INSTALLED|REJECTED|NEW mails.
> >
> The person who signs the changes file gets mailed
> My sponsor when I was in the queue would forward me the mails from
> dinstall/ftp-master, yours probably did this as well
Hmm. N
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
) from the secret journal of Jimmy O'Regan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
) > I'd say just go with the tar.gz the spec file is just used when making an
) > RPM, and the gif is included as X rpm tools can display custom icons for
) > each package
)
) at the risk of s
from the secret journal of Jimmy O'Regan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'd say just go with the tar.gz the spec file is just used when making an
> RPM, and the gif is included as X rpm tools can display custom icons for
> each package
at the risk of starting a really long thread, what are the chances of
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Timshel Knoll wrote:
) Hi,
)
) I'm looking at packaging glide3, which comes in a .src.rpm format.
) The .src.rpm contains 3 files (when unpacked with:
) rpm2cpio | cpio -i), 3dfx.gif, Glide3.10.tar.gz and
) Glide_V3-DRI-3.10.spec.
)
) What's the best way of packaging this?
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:04:49PM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at packaging glide3, which comes in a .src.rpm format.
> The .src.rpm contains 3 files (when unpacked with:
> rpm2cpio | cpio -i), 3dfx.gif, Glide3.10.tar.gz and
> Glide_V3-DRI-3.10.spec.
>
> What's the best way
Hi,
I'm looking at packaging glide3, which comes in a .src.rpm format.
The .src.rpm contains 3 files (when unpacked with:
rpm2cpio | cpio -i), 3dfx.gif, Glide3.10.tar.gz and
Glide_V3-DRI-3.10.spec.
What's the best way of packaging this? I'm intending using Doogie's
build system for this (as how
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
) from the secret journal of Jimmy O'Regan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
) > I'd say just go with the tar.gz the spec file is just used when making an
) > RPM, and the gif is included as X rpm tools can display custom icons for
) > each package
)
) at the risk of
from the secret journal of Jimmy O'Regan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'd say just go with the tar.gz the spec file is just used when making an
> RPM, and the gif is included as X rpm tools can display custom icons for
> each package
at the risk of starting a really long thread, what are the chances o
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Timshel Knoll wrote:
) Hi,
)
) I'm looking at packaging glide3, which comes in a .src.rpm format.
) The .src.rpm contains 3 files (when unpacked with:
) rpm2cpio | cpio -i), 3dfx.gif, Glide3.10.tar.gz and
) Glide_V3-DRI-3.10.spec.
)
) What's the best way of packaging this?
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:04:49PM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at packaging glide3, which comes in a .src.rpm format.
> The .src.rpm contains 3 files (when unpacked with:
> rpm2cpio | cpio -i), 3dfx.gif, Glide3.10.tar.gz and
> Glide_V3-DRI-3.10.spec.
>
> What's the best wa
Hi,
I'm looking at packaging glide3, which comes in a .src.rpm format.
The .src.rpm contains 3 files (when unpacked with:
rpm2cpio | cpio -i), 3dfx.gif, Glide3.10.tar.gz and
Glide_V3-DRI-3.10.spec.
What's the best way of packaging this? I'm intending using Doogie's
build system for this (as how
Package: packaging-manual
Version: 3.2.1.0
peter karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How do I get update-alternatives to keep information when upgrading a
>package?
>
>Currently I have postinst add it and prerm remove it, but if I set the
>alternative to point to something else than the default,
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 12:20:22AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Franklin Belew wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 08:37:55PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
> >>
> >> 8> Optionally tell your sponsoree when it is installed
> >
> >If she's
Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Franklin Belew wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 08:37:55PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
>>
>> 8> Optionally tell your sponsoree when it is installed
>
>If she's the Maintainer: she'll get notified (just a wild guess, might
>be the chang
Hi!
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Franklin Belew wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 08:37:55PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
>
> 8> Optionally tell your sponsoree when it is installed
If she's the Maintainer: she'll get notified (just a wild guess, might
be the changelog entry too).
At least /I/ got a few xzy
Package: packaging-manual
Version: 3.2.1.0
peter karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How do I get update-alternatives to keep information when upgrading a
>package?
>
>Currently I have postinst add it and prerm remove it, but if I set the
>alternative to point to something else than the default,
>
> You can also alternatively add an entry to the changelog instead of
> using the -m option to dpkg-buildpackage
>
the changelog is better, that way it makes the sponsorship obvious.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 08:37:55PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just try to sponsor Michael Piefel, who is in the NM
> process. He build successfully the package kimwitu++ and I
> uploaded the package, but it disappeared somehow. I think I
> missed something important :-)
>
> Is there a
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 12:20:22AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Franklin Belew wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 08:37:55PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
> >>
> >> 8> Optionally tell your sponsoree when it is installed
> >
> >If she'
On 13-Sep-2000 W. Borgert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just try to sponsor Michael Piefel, who is in the NM
> process. He build successfully the package kimwitu++ and I
> uploaded the package, but it disappeared somehow. I think I
> missed something important :-)
>
> Is there a page on www.debian.org th
Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Franklin Belew wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 08:37:55PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
>>
>> 8> Optionally tell your sponsoree when it is installed
>
>If she's the Maintainer: she'll get notified (just a wild guess, might
>be the chan
Hi,
I just try to sponsor Michael Piefel, who is in the NM
process. He build successfully the package kimwitu++ and I
uploaded the package, but it disappeared somehow. I think I
missed something important :-)
Is there a page on www.debian.org that tells me what I have
to do to sponsor Michael a
Hi!
How do I get update-alternatives to keep information when upgrading a
package?
Currently I have postinst add it and prerm remove it, but if I set the
alternative to point to something else than the default, this means
that that information gets lost everytime I upgrade the package...
(The pa
Hi!
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Franklin Belew wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 08:37:55PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
>
> 8> Optionally tell your sponsoree when it is installed
If she's the Maintainer: she'll get notified (just a wild guess, might
be the changelog entry too).
At least /I/ got a few xz
On 2913T005852+0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> >From this I conclude that it is not possible to have a (binary) dependency
> relationship restricted to a certain architecture. Is this reading correct,
> and if yes, is there a way to bypass this?
You can generate the dependency line in your debian/
>
> You can also alternatively add an entry to the changelog instead of
> using the -m option to dpkg-buildpackage
>
the changelog is better, that way it makes the sponsorship obvious.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 08:37:55PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just try to sponsor Michael Piefel, who is in the NM
> process. He build successfully the package kimwitu++ and I
> uploaded the package, but it disappeared somehow. I think I
> missed something important :-)
>
> Is there
On 13-Sep-2000 W. Borgert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just try to sponsor Michael Piefel, who is in the NM
> process. He build successfully the package kimwitu++ and I
> uploaded the package, but it disappeared somehow. I think I
> missed something important :-)
>
> Is there a page on www.debian.org t
Hi,
I just try to sponsor Michael Piefel, who is in the NM
process. He build successfully the package kimwitu++ and I
uploaded the package, but it disappeared somehow. I think I
missed something important :-)
Is there a page on www.debian.org that tells me what I have
to do to sponsor Michael
Hi!
How do I get update-alternatives to keep information when upgrading a
package?
Currently I have postinst add it and prerm remove it, but if I set the
alternative to point to something else than the default, this means
that that information gets lost everytime I upgrade the package...
(The p
On 2913T005852+0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> >From this I conclude that it is not possible to have a (binary) dependency
> relationship restricted to a certain architecture. Is this reading correct,
> and if yes, is there a way to bypass this?
You can generate the dependency line in your debian
32 matches
Mail list logo
