[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes:
> I see this as an argument for leaving the question in; that is, don't
> make it a `verbose'-mode only question. I would like it to default
> to the 2.2 kernel case, but offer the compat mode.
I disagree. I would assent to change the default and t
How is this issue going to affect the users?
E.g.: Can one boot up a slink system then access a /home directory on a
potato built fs. Is there a documented right way and wrong way of
upgrading to the new filesystem features.
There will be people running every concievable combination of new and
ol
> "Jordi" == Jordi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jordi> [1 ] On Sun, Jan
Jordi> 30, 2000 at 08:01:52AM +, Alexander Koch wrote:
>> > Because you have a computer that wont reliably run 2.2.x
>> without > crashing?
>>
>> You are a minority. I don't care about 2.0.x an
> "Christoph" == Christoph Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I know this has been discussed before, but I weren't
> concerned and didn't listen, sorry. Just now I submitted an
> ITP for a package which contains a GIF file in it's
> docu. Should I try to convert it into e.g.
I am trying to learn the features of OS GNU Hurd , it
looks like a great
effort but I want to know more about this, like
performance statistics.
Can you please point me to the direction where I can
find more
information about GNU Hurd OS, particularly about
performance and
reliability..
Is there an
On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 08:01:52AM +, Alexander Koch wrote:
> > Because you have a computer that wont reliably run 2.2.x without
> > crashing?
>
> You are a minority. I don't care about 2.0.x and everyone
> not updating is the expert since he knows what he needs. You
> cannot tell me the defau
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 09:28:11PM -0500, Ben Darnell wrote:
> > > The package is correctly depending on libgl1 instead of mesag3-glide2.
> > > The problem is that linking against the mesag3-glide2 version of
> > > libGL.so.1 pulls in libvga.so.1, which causes the package to depend on
> > > svgalib
On Sun, 30 January 2000 14:03:33 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > "Karl" == Karl M Hegbloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Karl> `potato' will come with a 2.2.x kernel. Why would anyone
> Karl> want to run a 2.0 kernel with it?
>
> Because you have a computer that wont reliably run 2.2.
Ben Darnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a package which depends on libgl1. On my machine, libgl1 is
> provided by mesag3-glide2. When I build the package, dpkg-shlibdeps
> makes it depend on svgalibg1 as well, because mesag3-glide2 needs it.
> This is inappropriate, since other packages
> "Karl" == Karl M Hegbloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Karl> `potato' will come with a 2.2.x kernel. Why would anyone
Karl> want to run a 2.0 kernel with it?
Because you have a computer that wont reliably run 2.2.x without
crashing? So far I have asked about exactly this problem on
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 02:58:38PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 04:43:06PM -0500, Ben Darnell wrote:
> > No, that's not the problem:
> > % cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/mesag3-glide2.shlibs
> > libGL 1 libgl1
> > libGLU 1 libgl1
> >
> > The package is correctly depending on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes:
> I don't agree with this change. I would rather it get asked always,
> and that the default is for the button that enables the new features
> and rejects Linux 2.0 compatability be highlighted by default, so
> that pressing [Enter] will take that
12 matches
Mail list logo
