[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes: > I don't agree with this change. I would rather it get asked always, > and that the default is for the button that enables the new features > and rejects Linux 2.0 compatability be highlighted by default, so > that pressing [Enter] will take that branch, [Tab][Enter] will turn > off the new filesystem features. Perhaps the quiet flag would then > take the default of enable the new features.
I don't think this should be asked by default, since only experts will care to diverge from the default (whatever we establish that the reasonable default is). > What advantage are the new features? What do they provide us with? > Do they make the filesystem more efficient? What do they do? Given that you can't even say what's the benefit of removing back compatability, it seems to me that retaining back-compatability is more desirable than removing it. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
