Re: copyright question

1999-06-09 Thread James Mastros
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 09:09:51PM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote: > Hi. Thank you for your opinion. > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > James Mastros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > clearly the intent of the author. He might be better served by simply going > > GPL; he has most of the gist the

Re: Library packages, libtool and automake.

1999-06-09 Thread Joel Klecker
At 08:25 -0600 1999-06-08, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: yes. libtool generates both the shared and the static libraries on a single pass, on the same directory. ./configure --prefix=/usr make that should be enough. Depends on how upstream set it up, some packages won't even use libtool unless

Re: copyright question

1999-06-09 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi. Thank you for your opinion. In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> James Mastros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 05:44:26PM -0700, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote: > > Taketoshi Sano proclaimed: > > >1-a. Source distribution have all information in the original > > > distri

Re: Old bugs, which cannot be reproduced

1999-06-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: doc-debian Version: 1.9.3 > ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is a handy, though undocumented, way to > reach a bug's submitter.) Oops, this ought to be documented! Are there any other obvious missing BTS commands? Julian =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: Old bugs, which cannot be reproduced

1999-06-09 Thread Steve Haslam
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 02:05:55AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > > > > Is it correct to simply close these bug reports after waiting one > > month for an answer? > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is a handy, though undocumented, way to > reach a bug's submitter.) Unfortunately,

Re: copyright question

1999-06-09 Thread James Mastros
On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 05:44:26PM -0700, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote: > Taketoshi Sano proclaimed: > >1-a. Source distribution have all information in the original > > distribution. > >1-b. Binary distribution have the complete corresponding machine-readable > > source code to

Re: copyright question

1999-06-09 Thread Sudhakar Chandrasekharan
Taketoshi Sano proclaimed: > So, I proposed the author to change the license as following, > and He agrees to this change now. > > %%% > Redistribution and use with or without modification are permitted provided > that the following conditions are met: > > 1. One of the following (1-a,1-b,1-c) >

Re: Old bugs, which cannot be reproduced

1999-06-09 Thread Richard Braakman
Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > I have some very old bug reports on some of my packages outstanding. I > cannot reproduce the problems and the reporters don't answer my > queries about the bugs. > > Is it correct to simply close these bug reports after waiting one > month for an answer? Yes, that is a